cawacko
Well-known member
no I didn't save it but it has stuck in my head ever since you wrote it. I disagree stongly with a lot of peoples politics (in the U.S.) but I'm not rooting for or cheering their death.
clinton lovers?
- Thread starter Chapdog
- Start date
no I didn't save it but it has stuck in my head ever since you wrote it. I disagree stongly with a lot of peoples politics (in the U.S.) but I'm not rooting for or cheering their death.
Beefy
Worst gambler ever
You mean you don't want to look through 46 billion uscitizen posts, all of which are thrilling, to find it. For shame.
Maybe you have him confused with me? I have certainly stated that I wish Dick cheney would drop dead, I am sick and tired of my tax dollars going to keep that 1/4 man, 3/4's machine alive.
I also wouldn't mind waking up and hearing that bush, the mass murderer, kicked the bucket. I have a red dress saved, unworn, for that occassion. I plan on throwing a huge party, and I will play nothing but "I could have danced all night" the whole evening.
And dance, in my red dress, I shall.
Annie
Not So Junior Member
A couple of the reasons I feel sorry for you. I dislike Pelosi, Boxer, Biden; detest Durbin, Reid, Clinton; yet never wanted any of them dead or even seriously ill.
Hey bitch what's up?
Maybe you can get a couple of your goons in here and get off on them calling me a whore and a cunt again?
Gosh, that'd be a great night for you, speaking of sad sacs.
Annie
Not So Junior Member
Hey bitch what's up?
Maybe you can get a couple of your goons in here and get off on them calling me a whore and a cunt again?
Gosh, that'd be a great night for you, speaking of sad sacs.
Well I've been posting here since that flare up, I don't think you will see anything by me on the likes of that.
If others have a problem with my being here, think me a liar, unfair, a bigot, etc., bring it on.
Socrtease
Verified User
One day I shall go to Strom Thurmond's grave and when no one is looking I will PISS on that racist bastards grave. All those years he had and KNEW he had a black daughter and still he worked to keep her a second class citizen.
"We" have discussed nothing. You are being disingenuous suggesting that "we" discussed anything.
Just stop it already. We've discussed this at length in the other thread. You're just being obtuse at this point.
As it is, the reality is that projecting a "budget surplus" while never realizing a surplus and increasing the debt is not a "surplus".
You are being deliberately obtuse if you suggest anything otherwise. If you borrow money on another credit card to pay off the interest of another one, you are still borrowing money.
Basically, I do not confuse a deficit with a debt. I have stated that Congress and Clinton working together slowed the growth of the debt and lowered the deficit to a mere 18 Billion. This was the best we have done in over 45 years. Don't be so deliberately foolish as to pretend you and I had a conversation we did not have on another thread.
Beefy
Worst gambler ever
Just stop it already. We've discussed this at length in the other thread. You're just being obtuse at this point.
Thus there was no "surplus". There was a defecit every year since the 70s/ Politicians waste money. Yes, Bush is the worst offender of all, but I don't want him to become a standard. Its fucked up either way.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
The grave is probably a phosphorus mine by now anyway, Soc...
Sorry I haven't given you that kind of thought, you'll have to ask someone who has.
The "bring it on" was very tough though. I almost swooned. It seems as if I've heard it somewhere before and it didn't work out so well? But I can't recall.
I wonder if any of the war-supporters who are professing outrage and by implication, moral superiority, over the idea of someone wishing that bush or cheney or both, would die, could expand on this, because it leaves me curious.
Cawacko since you were the first to bring it up, and since war supporter Kathianne is too busy showing her better than average nature by expressing her pity for my general patheticness (who's better than you huh Kath?) maybe you can explain.
How does one support a war, now known to be based on a lie, period. Period. and still claim to be outraged by the idea of anyone who sees this war for exactly what it is, the mass murder of women and children, wishing that those responsible for that mass murder of women and children, would just drop dead, because the world would be a better place?
And how, do these same war-supporters, also support the death penality for someone who killed one single person, even if their lawyer was asleep during the trial? In effect, supporting and enabling the active role in retrubution killings, rather than taking the passive role, which is, not to kill, but to admit you would find some satisfaction in the murderer's death by natural causes.
Now the argument that war sucks, but it had to be done, and bush and cheney are not mass murderers will not be accepted. There are no wmds. Hundreds of thousands of women and children have been burned to death by cheney and bush, and with your support.
So take your false outrage and stick it in your asses.
You people are actually ridiculous.
Cawacko since you were the first to bring it up, and since war supporter Kathianne is too busy showing her better than average nature by expressing her pity for my general patheticness (who's better than you huh Kath?) maybe you can explain.
How does one support a war, now known to be based on a lie, period. Period. and still claim to be outraged by the idea of anyone who sees this war for exactly what it is, the mass murder of women and children, wishing that those responsible for that mass murder of women and children, would just drop dead, because the world would be a better place?
And how, do these same war-supporters, also support the death penality for someone who killed one single person, even if their lawyer was asleep during the trial? In effect, supporting and enabling the active role in retrubution killings, rather than taking the passive role, which is, not to kill, but to admit you would find some satisfaction in the murderer's death by natural causes.
Now the argument that war sucks, but it had to be done, and bush and cheney are not mass murderers will not be accepted. There are no wmds. Hundreds of thousands of women and children have been burned to death by cheney and bush, and with your support.
So take your false outrage and stick it in your asses.
You people are actually ridiculous.
I would dearly enjoy seeing the entire WH get some kind of miserable but non deadly disease. Oh wait they already have cranialanalitis
Butt that only causes misery to others not the disease bearer....sigh.
I've seen enough GOP debates and speeches, to know that the faux outrage, and wagging of fingers about wishing death on anyone is a crock.
McCain sang "bomb, bomb bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" to the melody of the beach boys Barbara Ann tune, and the GOP audience laughed and giggled about bombing a country that doesn't have a nuclear weapons program, and GOP audiences applauded and swooned at getting "all Jack Bauer" on detainees at gitmo.
Pathetic and immoral.
Can we play and sing along to "Ding dong the witch is dead, the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead"?
Yes.
cawacko
Well-known member
I wonder if any of the war-supporters who are professing outrage and by implication, moral superiority, over the idea of someone wishing that bush or cheney or both, would die, could expand on this, because it leaves me curious.
Cawacko since you were the first to bring it up, and since war supporter Kathianne is too busy showing her better than average nature by expressing her pity for my general patheticness (who's better than you huh Kath?) maybe you can explain.
How does one support a war, now known to be based on a lie, period. Period. and still claim to be outraged by the idea of anyone who sees this war for exactly what it is, the mass murder of women and children, wishing that those responsible for that mass murder of women and children, would just drop dead, because the world would be a better place?
And how, do these same war-supporters, also support the death penality for someone who killed one single person, even if their lawyer was asleep during the trial? In effect, supporting and enabling the active role in retrubution killings, rather than taking the passive role, which is, not to kill, but to admit you would find some satisfaction in the murderer's death by natural causes.
Now the argument that war sucks, but it had to be done, and bush and cheney are not mass murderers will not be accepted. There are no wmds. Hundreds of thousands of women and children have been burned to death by cheney and bush, and with your support.
So take your false outrage and stick it in your asses.
You people are actually ridiculous.
I don't have outrage I have laughter at how weak uscitizen is. To claim some want Clinton dead now because people disagree wth him politically after he is out of office is laughable. He's pathetic.
As far as "war-mongers" etc. that you guy's opinion go ahead.
Well, since I remember shortly after his election in 92, almost immediately seeing bumper stickers which read “impeach him hell, let’s hang him” I think it’s far-fetched to say that no one wants Clinton dead. Are you forgetting we had posters, Imno comes to mind right off, who stated they did want to see Clinton dead “just for breathing”? And that was after he was out of office.
And that’s “mass-murderers” Cawacko, in reference to bush and cheney, not “war-mongers”. Though they are certainly both, and thanks for pointing that out!