Collusion with the Russians

E

Evmetro

New member
I regard to evidence of collusion with the Russians, is there more evidence of this against Trump, or against Hillary?
 
I wonder how many DEMOCRATS are butthurt because they fell for this:


oimbng3l0mvz.jpg
 
How about why would the Russians not back hitlery when she got them the Uranium One deal. I mean is doesn't follow logic. none especially when they paid her hubby 500K for a speech. and gave her foundation 95 million.
 
Collusion isn't a crime so stop pretending it is. What Hillary did was treason, and she should be dealt with just as the Rosenbergs.
 
Truth of 2016 president election

The core is to help Trump to grab the president power.
The mastermind is the FBI.
Russian is only a scapegoat hired to get the thing done.

Clinton is victim but has been targetted by the FBI

Hillary's email was hacked. She is a victim. Russian (or the FBI) is the thief. But in this election the FBI attacked Clinton all the way to help their candidate Trump to steal the president seat.
 
940. The FBI interfere US president election (12/29/2016)


The FBI played an active role to interfere the US 2016 president election. It hit Democrate's nominee Hillary Clinton by email gate to help its candidate Donald Trump. The evident scene was in July 5 during Chilcot report. "FBI Director Comey potentially gave Clinton’s political rivals some ammunition, conceding there was "evidence of mishandling” classified information and that an FBI employee who did the same “would face consequences for this.”
The FBI didn't indict Clinton because they have no evidence that Clinton intended to do wrong with her email setup."(washingtonpost.com) In fact, this is common for others. Powell had done samething. Why they beat the drum this time on Clinton? Because this time the FBI need a candidate of their own to handle a criminal case. So they determined to help Trump to win the election. This was also the time the Feds made a secret deal with Russian to hack Clinton's computer.

So then Trump started to call for Russian's help. Why not China? Because he knew they had a deal with Russia already.

Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

—JULY 27, 2016

https://myaccount.nytimes.com/mobil...itics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html
Click to expand...

What Russian had hacked? Maybe there was something important. Because in President Debate, Trump intimidated his rival hillary that he'd have special prosecutor and "you'd be in jail".

On 10/28, the FBI director Comey reopened Clintion email investigation, then dramatically dropped the investigation on 11/6. A powerful department of the nation so openly, actively interfere in president election is unprecedented.
 
Right said:
Collusion isn't a crime so stop pretending it is. What Hillary did was treason, and she should be dealt with just as the Rosenbergs.
Click to expand...

You should be dealt with via involuntary commitment in a mental institution.

Retard.
 
In regard to the evidence. you do not know what it is. the word is there are prosecutions coming from what Mueller has compiled. Hillary has been investigated over, and over and over. She is guilty of nothing. She sat in front of the last Republican tribunal, answered questions for 11 hours, and did not take the 5th . Hillary investigations are just defections.
 
Russia investigations total 5 including Mueller. After 10 mo we learn there is no evidence of collusion by anyone. The Media loves it because they always have something to write about. Politicians love it because it gets them face time on TV as they promote them selves. Everyone appears to agree that Russia interfered in our elections but no one can quantify the effect. For a crime to be committed, assets need to have changed hands. Manafort looks guilty of money laundering but it has nothing to do with Russian interference. Flynn did a deal with Turkey. Again not Russia. Clinton ended up with millions in the Fund as well as 500k for Bubba's speech but the uranium one connections will never be proven. GPS could have been paid by FBI which reeks of an illegal political scandal.
Personally, I think the subject is getting redundant and boring unless someone is indicted, tried and broadcast on TV.
 
Evmetro said:
I regard to evidence of collusion with the Russians, is there more evidence of this against Trump, or against Hillary?
Click to expand...

The FACTS point towards Hillary and the Democratic Party of the Jackass The only thing pointing to Trump are whiny false rants and the predictable bullshit the FAKE media is willing to fling around.
 
so you claim our entire judicial system is evil

and our entire media


and our entire security field



what part of America do you still like
 
Right said:
Collusion isn't a crime so stop pretending it is. What Hillary did was treason, and she should be dealt with just as the Rosenbergs.
Click to expand...

It is quite fascinating that the FAKE media and Democratic Party of the Jackass think they can fabricate a crime over collusion when one merely talks to a Russian.

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party of the Jackass was in cahoots with Russians when they bought and paid for the FAKE dossier on Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top