Colorado hipsters will buy 2 million ounces in 2014

The Dude

Banned
Colorado's new legal weed laws will be put to good use in the coming year, according to a recent study from Colorado State University which predicts that Coloradans will use more than 2 million ounces of marijuana in 2014.

The study conducted by the Colorado Futures Center at CSU estimates that in 2014, 642,772 Colorado residents -- roughly 12 percent of the state population -- will be buying legal marijuana, bags and bags of it, in 2014. The CSU researchers assume that each marijuana user will buy approximately 3.5 ounces of pot during the year, for a grand total of 2,258,985 ounces of pot -- that's about 142,000 pounds or 71 tons.

The study assumes that an ounce of weed costs about $185, a price point set by averages at crowd-sourced marijuana price website PriceOfWeed.com along with estimated tax rates on marijuana, and based on that price -- which will of course shift up or down depending on region and quality of the pot -- Coloradans will be spending about $420 million on marijuana next year.

That figure could be much higher because the data was compiled when recreational marijuana was still illegal -- PriceOfWeed.com shows the average price of an ounce of "low quality" pot currently at $222.

Amendment 64 also allows Coloradans to grow their own marijuana supply for personal use, so the numbers could skew downward if more residents opt-in on growing than buying at retail stores. However, since a legal, recreational marijuana marketplace is such a new concept, there remains many unknowns about how profitable, or not, it will turn out to be.

The Coloradoan followed up this study with a video showing what 3.5 ounces of pot -- the assumed average a Colorado pot smoker uses -- looks like (because they obviously could not get their hands on 2.2 million ounces). Watch the video above.

Colorado voters passed Amendment 64 last November making the limited sale, possession and growing of marijuana for recreational purposes legal for adults 21 and over. A64 states that adults can possess up to an ounce of pot, can grow as many as six marijuana plants at home (with only three flowering at any given time), but that home-grown marijuana can only be for personal use and cannot be sold, however, adults can gift one another up to an ounce of pot.
 
Colorado's new legal weed laws will be put to good use in the coming year, according to a recent study from Colorado State University which predicts that Coloradans will use more than 2 million ounces of marijuana in 2014.

The study conducted by the Colorado Futures Center at CSU estimates that in 2014, 642,772 Colorado residents -- roughly 12 percent of the state population -- will be buying legal marijuana, bags and bags of it, in 2014. The CSU researchers assume that each marijuana user will buy approximately 3.5 ounces of pot during the year, for a grand total of 2,258,985 ounces of pot -- that's about 142,000 pounds or 71 tons.

The study assumes that an ounce of weed costs about $185, a price point set by averages at crowd-sourced marijuana price website PriceOfWeed.com along with estimated tax rates on marijuana, and based on that price -- which will of course shift up or down depending on region and quality of the pot -- Coloradans will be spending about $420 million on marijuana next year.

That figure could be much higher because the data was compiled when recreational marijuana was still illegal -- PriceOfWeed.com shows the average price of an ounce of "low quality" pot currently at $222.

Amendment 64 also allows Coloradans to grow their own marijuana supply for personal use, so the numbers could skew downward if more residents opt-in on growing than buying at retail stores. However, since a legal, recreational marijuana marketplace is such a new concept, there remains many unknowns about how profitable, or not, it will turn out to be.

The Coloradoan followed up this study with a video showing what 3.5 ounces of pot -- the assumed average a Colorado pot smoker uses -- looks like (because they obviously could not get their hands on 2.2 million ounces). Watch the video above.

Colorado voters passed Amendment 64 last November making the limited sale, possession and growing of marijuana for recreational purposes legal for adults 21 and over. A64 states that adults can possess up to an ounce of pot, can grow as many as six marijuana plants at home (with only three flowering at any given time), but that home-grown marijuana can only be for personal use and cannot be sold, however, adults can gift one another up to an ounce of pot.

Seeing as you can't be bothered to provide a link!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/coloradans-will-use-more-_n_3307431.html
 
Quite the new economy for Colorado. I don't smoke anymore....but those prices seem cheap. A buddy of mine smokes it, and for what he says is decent(2-3hit stuff), he pays $180/ half ounce.
 
Price would fall 75 percent once the tobacco companies pay enough bribes (er lobby enough) to make it legal nationally.
They already have bought thousands of acres in the holy land ( north Cali emerald triangle).
 
Cannabis at a Medical Dispensary here costs $280 an ounce and up. If you have friends who are vendors, maybe $200 an ounce. If you have friends in Northern California, $100 and ounce. And they like to sell by the pound.
 
Price would fall 75 percent once the tobacco companies pay enough bribes (er lobby enough) to make it legal nationally.
They already have bought thousands of acres in the holy land ( north Cali emerald triangle).

Wow, that's fucking brilliant. Obviously, their business model is unsustainable (at least in the West, Asia is still puffing away)...they have to diversify. They will probably make it hard on the small grower.
 
Price would fall 75 percent once the tobacco companies pay enough bribes (er lobby enough) to make it legal nationally.
They already have bought thousands of acres in the holy land ( north Cali emerald triangle).

That's just it...I live in Pennsylvania where it is still quite illegal. There was talk about a Medical Marijuana bill...but I think it got squashed. Hell, we can't even buy beer in stores and liquor is controlled by the Commonwealth. If we want a bottle of booze, we have to go to a State Store...total monopoly.

I'm a State worker, and I hate to see any fellow employees lose their jobs...but some of the old Blue Laws have got to go. They can finish their careers in Harrisburg or some regional office pushing papers...most of them are getting close to their 35 years anyway...that's what I would have to do if they closed the ICFMR that I work at.
 
Wow, that's fucking brilliant. Obviously, their business model is unsustainable (at least in the West, Asia is still puffing away)...they have to diversify. They will probably make it hard on the small grower.

I have always wondered why they haven't done it sooner. They could even grow it with the tobacco, marijuana is good for soil, tobacco is horrible, strips nutrients.
 
Cannabis at a Medical Dispensary here costs $280 an ounce and up. If you have friends who are vendors, maybe $200 an ounce. If you have friends in Northern California, $100 and ounce. And they like to sell by the pound.

Alaska gets a lot of Californa green, but local is the best, from the Matanuska Valley.
 
Price would fall 75 percent once the tobacco companies pay enough bribes (er lobby enough) to make it legal nationally.
They already have bought thousands of acres in the holy land ( north Cali emerald triangle).

No they have not. I don't know why you continue to repeat a lie that originated with the Stop19 campaign. Big tobacco does not even own the land on which their tobacco is grown.
 
That's just it...I live in Pennsylvania where it is still quite illegal. There was talk about a Medical Marijuana bill...but I think it got squashed. Hell, we can't even buy beer in stores and liquor is controlled by the Commonwealth. If we want a bottle of booze, we have to go to a State Store...total monopoly.

I'm a State worker, and I hate to see any fellow employees lose their jobs...but some of the old Blue Laws have got to go. They can finish their careers in Harrisburg or some regional office pushing papers...most of them are getting close to their 35 years anyway...that's what I would have to do if they closed the ICFMR that I work at.

Drove my sis up to NYU in the 80's for grad school. Stopped in North Carolina for a beer on a Saturday at a convenience store, asked the guy where was the iced down singles and he looked at me like I was an alien!
 
Wow, that's fucking brilliant. Obviously, their business model is unsustainable (at least in the West, Asia is still puffing away)...they have to diversify. They will probably make it hard on the small grower.
That's why Cali growers voted against it.
 
A northern Colorado man is planning to file a lawsuit against the state's new controversial pot DUI bill as it waits for the governor's signature next week.

According to a report by The Associated Press, Nunn, Colo. resident Brandon Baker plans to file a lawsuit in Denver federal court Tuesday. Baker argues that he uses marijuana for religious reasons and that the THC-blood limit for motorists is too low.

THC is the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana that produces the "high" sensation users experience.

After failing six times in the past three years, the state legislature just passed House Bill 13-1325 placing a 5 nanogram limit on THC blood levels. Under the bill, any driver with a THC blood content higher than that limit would be considered too stoned to drive and could be ticketed similarly to a person who was considered too drunk to drive.

This year's bill however does allow room for people to rebut the charge that they are too impaired to drive.

A marijuana Q&A published Tuesday by The Brookings Institution points out that both Colorado and Washington appear to have adopted the same DUI policy when it comes to marijuana. However Colorado's Amendment 64 mandates that the state's Department of Revenue adopt all regulations July 1, a full seven months ahead of when Washington regulations are scheduled to go into effect.
 
That's why Cali growers voted against it.

Again, this is another lie from the Stop19 groups. A minority of them opposed it. Most of them were idiot communist who buy into a bunch of conspiratorial nonsense or at least that is what they used to promote their argument. You can find responses to them on norml including to the one about buying property.
 
Again, this is another lie from the Stop19 groups. A minority of them opposed it. Most of them were idiot communist who buy into a bunch of conspiratorial nonsense or at least that is what they used to promote their argument. You can find responses to them on norml including to the one about buying property.
Which you can't prove
If you don't think big tabacco isn't a huge threat you aren't very business Savy.
 
Price would fall 75 percent once the tobacco companies pay enough bribes (er lobby enough) to make it legal nationally.
They already have bought thousands of acres in the holy land ( north Cali emerald triangle).

The price of good sticky 'smell it on your fingers' great tasting weed around Atlanta is about 65 dollars a half ounce.

My friend buys the California 200 dollars a half ounce weed .. not much difference.

Additionally, I'm thinking that with all the problems Obama is having with Holder and the DOJ .. he may see the wisdom of backing off The Precious. :0)
 
The price of good sticky 'smell it on your fingers' great tasting weed around Atlanta is about 65 dollars a half ounce.

My friend buys the California 200 dollars a half ounce weed .. not much difference.

Additionally, I'm thinking that with all the problems Obama is having with Holder and the DOJ .. he may see the wisdom of backing off The Precious. :0)
We can get schwag for 100 oz, hydro icky is 400 and up in nawlins yuppyville
 
Which you can't prove
If you don't think big tabacco isn't a huge threat you aren't very business Savy.

You are spouting Alex Jones type bullshit on this and the one making the assertion. The burden of proof is on you.

There were no big land buys in the Emerald Triangle. Again, big tobacco does not even own the tobacco farms.

Richard Lee was a major producer and had the backing of other growers. Yes, there were some growers, users and dispensaries that were opposed to 19, but they were the ones selfishly seeking their own self interests and were not the majority.

http://stash.norml.org/big-tobacco-is-not-poised-to-take-over-californias-marijuana-market
 
You are spouting Alex Jones type bullshit on this and the one making the assertion. The burden of proof is on you.

There were no big land buys in the Emerald Triangle. Again, big tobacco does not even own the tobacco farms.

Richard Lee was a major producer and had the backing of other growers. Yes, there were some growers, users and dispensaries that were opposed to 19, but they were the ones selfishly seeking their own self interests and were not the majority.

http://stash.norml.org/big-tobacco-is-not-poised-to-take-over-californias-marijuana-market
You can't prove they didn't buy, which I don't care!
Do you know what barriers to entry means?
 
Back
Top