Columbia professor is charged with incest

Hypocrite.

Knock it the fuck of you pissant cunt. We don't want a conservative maineman around here perving up the board. Try me you perverted little whimp. I dare you.

I've had it with this shit.

You'll let me know you understand by not partaking in this lowlife accusationary bullshit. Get it whimpy? Because if you don't you're gone for good. You and maineman can find a nice little circle jerk in another part of the internet to spew your disgusting filth.
 
You know, I have three daughters. I read a story like this and all I can think...

What kind of a sick, twisted fuck can look at his daughter and think, "I'd hit that!"?

Then, I see people defend this sort of sick practice, question the validity of the laws prohibiting it, and I think I get my answer.

You can't ban something just because you think it's disgusting.
 
While I agree that comparing you to women does denigrate women, I really don't care what you say or do, just keep it out of the gutter.
 
I was referring to your use of the word "cunt". I suggest, by the way, that you continue to use it as often as possible. The women within earshot are bound to find it flattering. :good4u:
 
I was referring to your use of the word "cunt". I suggest, by the way, that you continue to use it as often as possible. The women within earshot are bound to find it flattering. :good4u:

SM, just let it go. You're trying to look tough and coming off as petty.
 
BTW, I wasn't kidding about that stepmom analogy. If I wound up with a smokin' hot stepmom who is the trophy wife of my much older father, I would bang the hell out of her, and continue on even if/after they split up.
 
Yes he did. Since it was similar to others here, esp 107, that makes him a hypocrite and exposes his smoking hot hatred for me. :)

Or it shows you are trying to push the rules for your own ego boost.

But if you want to play the victim, knock yourself out.
 
Of course it matters, since it proves that I crushed you completely. :)

:rofl: It proves what? It proves that you spent an inordinate amount of time trying to convince the worldof something most people assumed anyway.

It proves that you have to have some meaningless diversion to throw out when you start losing a debate. Which is quite often, I might add.

And it proves you will make assertions, insist they are 100% accurate, and then refuse to bet on them because you only bet on a sure thing.

Yeah, you proved plenty.
 
Oh lookie, suddenly we have more *gasp* social conservatives. :)

I've always leaned slightly to the right and though I take no issue with same sex marriage, I draw the line at rape, child abuse, and incest. As Ted Nugent says, I can tolerate sexual choice, just not the the next of kin.
 
Back
Top