Comey has written an anti-Trump novel that will be amazingly discredited

dukkha

Verified User
My first reaction to fired FBI Director James Comey’s new book "A Higher Loyalty" is to demand that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein release the still-secret Comey memorandums describing his conversations with Donald Trump as president-elect and president. After seeing hundreds of pages of Comey’s self-serving version of reality, the American people deserve to see what he actually wrote at the time of these conversations.

I suspect the memos will undermine a lot of Comey’s case. In fact, it is hard to understand why Rosenstein is keeping these memos hidden – unless it weakens the Deep State’s case against President Trump.

There are two striking things about the initial leaks of the Comey anti-Trump novel. And I call it a novel because it will be amazingly discredited after the elite media is done fawning over Comey and people actually look at what he wrote and how he positioned himself.

Before you believe what is written in Comey’s book, you should watch this video compiled by the Republican National Committee to remember what leading Democrats said about Comey in 2016.


Immediately after Comey announced that the FBI had reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails in late October 2016, virtually every leading Democrat called him a disgrace and said that he should be fired or resign.

Democrats attacking Comey included House Minority Nancy Pelosi of California, current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, and former Senate Minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada. Democratic Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who lost the Democratic presidential nomination to Clinton, joined in the anti-Comey chorus.

Then, miraculously – after President Trump fired him and Comey began to attack his former boss – Democrats suddenly considered Comey a saintly, loyal public servant.

Make no mistake, this book is a work of political fiction in which Saint Comey was perfect in his treatment of Hillary Clinton, perfect in his treatment of President Trump, and perfect in his reflection every time he looked in the mirror.

The book is, of course, the angry diatribe of an embittered, fired employee. Anyone who has had to fire someone who was convinced they were right and you were wrong can appreciate the intensity of Comey’s anger. That intensity and that bitterness flows throughout the book.

Comey is a man who lied to Congress about never having leaked documents and then admitted a few weeks later that he had given documents to a college professor friend, specifically so this professor could pass the information to the media – in this case, the New York Times. Comey told Congress he did this so the media could demand a new independent counsel, who Comey was sure would be Robert Mueller.

Comey is a man who took a now totally discredited dossier written by Christopher Steele to Donald Trump and was surprised that Trump was shaken by some of the viciously dishonest things written about him in it
Comey also had used this phony document to get a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court warrant to eavesdrop on Americans involved in the Trump campaign.

I am sure Comey will make a lot of money as anti-Trump media personalities swoon over him and anti-Trump elites rush to buy his book.

Sadly, he will have tarnished the FBI and set a terrible precedent for future directors. After this, if you were president, would you confide in an official who could end up writing a vicious version of your conversations a year later?

Comey will go down in history as the most discredited director of the FBI we have ever had. Remember that when you watch the self-serving interviews and fawning left-wing media reports.
 
Its not a novel..

Comey has done America a huge service.. What sort of man would keep silent when a demented old man had become president?

Asking Comey to "disprove" the Pee allegations to convince Melania is really sick.

No one has claimed the allegations are true.

Trump has demential.
 
Let's look at the history of both men.

Which one has lived a life of lying, exaggeration, self-promotion, and arrogance, and which one has a demonstrated life history of relative integrity, duty, and public service?
 
Its not a novel..

Comey has done America a huge service.. What sort of man would keep silent when a demented old man had become president?

Asking Comey to "disprove" the Pee allegations to convince Melania is really sick.

No one has claimed the allegations are true.

Trump has demential.
you show a gross misunderstanding of chain of command, and loyalty.
Real loyalty to the institutions if not Trump himself.

when you get past the self righteous sanctimony you might see that, unlike Comey who is too far gone with his persecution complex
 
Let's look at the history of both men.

Which one has lived a life of lying, exaggeration, self-promotion, and arrogance, and which one has a demonstrated life history of relative integrity, duty, and public service?
look at them in office..which one lied to Congress?
which one lied to FISA judges?

Comey is a disgrace to the FBI and to his role. h's an embittered man, much like the Democrats/Hillary as a whole
 
you show a gross misunderstanding of chain of command, and loyalty.
Real loyalty to the institutions if not Trump himself.

when you get past the self righteous sanctimony you might see that, unlike Comey who is too far gone with his persecution complex

:lolup: :rofl2:
 
James Comey's cryptic reference in his new book to "a development still unknown to the American public" involving then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Hillary Clinton email probe is sparking furious speculation inside and outside the Beltway.

According to ABC News, Comey writes in "A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership," that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of the mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch's independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.”

ny revelation that Lynch might have been biased in favor of Clinton won't surprise Trump supporters, but what exactly Comey means is a tantalizing mystery. The only details Comey offers is that the U.S. government became aware of information from a classified source in earlier 2016 -- both the source and the information is still classified.

Lynch fueled speculation she was running interference for Clinton when she met with former President Bill Clinton on her plane on the tarmac of a Phoenix airport in July 2016, just days before Comey announced that he would not be recommending charges against Clinton -- despite calling her handling of classified information “extremely careless.”

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said on “Fox and Friends” Friday that Comey’s book was a hint at the real reason for his July press conference.

“There were a lot of things that called into question the legitimacy of that investigation, including what he's now making reference to, some of us have alluded to a lot in the past which is the real reason he had the July 5 press conference,” he said. “It wasn't the tarmac, it was information he had about Loretta Lynch that if it became public, people would question their objectivity.”

The New York Times first reported in April 2017 that the FBI received a batch of documents picked up by Russia as part of the country’s hacking campaign. Those documents reportedly included a memo and email from a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Lynch would keep the Clinton probe from going too far.

The Times reported that Comey believed that if Lynch closed the case and Russia leaked the document, it would raise doubts about the independence of the investigation. But former DOJ officials told the Times the FBI never uncovered evidence tying Lynch to the author of the document, and think Comey wanted an excuse to put himself in the spotlight.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, subsequently asked Comey about the document at a Senate hearing, but Comey said he couldn’t answer the question in that forum as it would call for a classified response.

Lynch did not immediately return a request for comment from Fox News on Friday.

According to ABC, Comey says he didn’t sense that Lynch interfered with the investigation but said that the tarmac meeting between Lynch and Clinton also pushed Comey to give his own account of the Clinton probe.

But according to The Washington Post, Comey criticized Lynch's “tortured half-out, half-in approach” to the Clinton investigation and considered calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...g-lynch-still-unknown-to-american-public.html
 
Relax, Comey's book doesn't drop any bombshells, all it does is reinforce the negative image the vast majority of Americans already have of the President, if I was a Trumpkin I'd be more concerned with what is occurring in the Manhattan prosecutor's office.

The GOP cherrypicking Democrats and creating defensive talking points is inane, no one is going to change their view of Comey nor Trump because the GOP is attempting character assassination

And all the Comey/Rosenstien/Deep State conspiracy crapola is just a deflection, and given the umpteen conspiracies the conservatives are currently pushing it only dilutes their objective
 
the Times found that this go-it-alone strategy was shaped by his distrust of senior officials at the Justice Department, who he and other F.B.I. officials felt had provided Mrs. Clinton with political cover. The distrust extended to his boss, Loretta E. Lynch, the attorney general, who Mr. Comey believed had subtly helped play down the Clinton investigation.

His misgivings were only fueled by the discovery last year of a document written by a Democratic operative that seemed — at least in the eyes of Mr. Comey and his aides — to raise questions about her independence. In a bizarre example of how tangled the F.B.I. investigations had become, the document had been stolen by Russian hackers....

document obtained by the F.B.I. reinforced that idea.

During Russia’s hacking campaign against the United States, intelligence agencies could peer, at times, into Russian networks and see what had been taken. Early last year, F.B.I. agents received a batch of hacked documents, and one caught their attention.

The document, which has been described as both a memo and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former officials familiar with the document.

Read one way, it was standard Washington political chatter. Read another way, it suggested that a political operative might have insight into Ms. Lynch’s thinking.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html
 
On one side you have an honest highly respected FBI leader and a war hero. On the other Trump. One is famous for lying and whoring around. And yes, Fox will shred the Comey book. they are far right Trumpettes. The nation will know better.
 
Relax, Comey's book doesn't drop any bombshells, all it does is reinforce the negative image the vast majority of Americans already have of the President
agreed
The GOP cherrypicking Democrats and creating defensive talking points is inane, no one is going to change their view of Comey nor Trump because the GOP is attempting character assassination
that's not cherry picking,that was universal condemnation by the Dem leadership of Comey
And all the Comey/Rosenstien/Deep State conspiracy crapola is just a deflection, and given the umpteen conspiracies the conservatives are currently pushing it only dilutes their objective
IG report supposedly delayed until after the Comey book. Even I am starting to wonder why so many delays
 
My first reaction to fired FBI Director James Comey’s new book "A Higher Loyalty" is to demand that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein release the still-secret Comey memorandums describing his conversations with Donald Trump as president-elect and president. After seeing hundreds of pages of Comey’s self-serving version of reality, the American people deserve to see what he actually wrote at the time of these conversations.

I suspect the memos will undermine a lot of Comey’s case. In fact, it is hard to understand why Rosenstein is keeping these memos hidden – unless it weakens the Deep State’s case against President Trump.

There are two striking things about the initial leaks of the Comey anti-Trump novel. And I call it a novel because it will be amazingly discredited after the elite media is done fawning over Comey and people actually look at what he wrote and how he positioned himself.

Before you believe what is written in Comey’s book, you should watch this video compiled by the Republican National Committee to remember what leading Democrats said about Comey in 2016.


Immediately after Comey announced that the FBI had reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails in late October 2016, virtually every leading Democrat called him a disgrace and said that he should be fired or resign.

Democrats attacking Comey included House Minority Nancy Pelosi of California, current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, and former Senate Minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada. Democratic Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who lost the Democratic presidential nomination to Clinton, joined in the anti-Comey chorus.

Then, miraculously – after President Trump fired him and Comey began to attack his former boss – Democrats suddenly considered Comey a saintly, loyal public servant.

Make no mistake, this book is a work of political fiction in which Saint Comey was perfect in his treatment of Hillary Clinton, perfect in his treatment of President Trump, and perfect in his reflection every time he looked in the mirror.

The book is, of course, the angry diatribe of an embittered, fired employee. Anyone who has had to fire someone who was convinced they were right and you were wrong can appreciate the intensity of Comey’s anger. That intensity and that bitterness flows throughout the book.

Comey is a man who lied to Congress about never having leaked documents and then admitted a few weeks later that he had given documents to a college professor friend, specifically so this professor could pass the information to the media – in this case, the New York Times. Comey told Congress he did this so the media could demand a new independent counsel, who Comey was sure would be Robert Mueller.

Comey is a man who took a now totally discredited dossier written by Christopher Steele to Donald Trump and was surprised that Trump was shaken by some of the viciously dishonest things written about him in it
Comey also had used this phony document to get a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court warrant to eavesdrop on Americans involved in the Trump campaign.

I am sure Comey will make a lot of money as anti-Trump media personalities swoon over him and anti-Trump elites rush to buy his book.

Sadly, he will have tarnished the FBI and set a terrible precedent for future directors. After this, if you were president, would you confide in an official who could end up writing a vicious version of your conversations a year later?

Comey will go down in history as the most discredited director of the FBI we have ever had. Remember that when you watch the self-serving interviews and fawning left-wing media reports.

Truly pulp fiction with Narcissus complex.

46174-004-F5BA3665.jpg


Narcissus
Narcissus, wall painting; from the House of Marcus Lucretius Fronto, Pompeii, Italy, 14–62 ce.
 
[h=1]Poll: 55% of Republicans say Trump should NOT fire Mueller, 22% say he should[/h]Maybe Republicans in Congress will realize it's time to cut their losses with their fund baby Forrest Trump on bath salts.

QU180411.JPG
 
[h=1]Poll: 55% of Republicans say Trump should NOT fire Mueller, 22% say he should[/h]Maybe Republicans in Congress will realize it's time to cut their losses with their fund baby Forrest Trump on bath salts.

QU180411.JPG

He should not and will not fire him.
 
look at them in office..which one lied to Congress?
which one lied to FISA judges?

Comey is a disgrace to the FBI and to his role. h's an embittered man, much like the Democrats/Hillary as a whole

How do you know who said what to a FISA judge? I'll save you your bullshit response. YOU DON'T.

Please spare us any claims about ANYONE lying. You defend the most prolific liar in Presidential history. A PATHOLOGICAL liar.

Delusional hypocrite.
 
How do you know who said what to a FISA judge? I'll save you your bullshit response. YOU DON'T.

Please spare us any claims about ANYONE lying. You defend the most prolific liar in Presidential history. A PATHOLOGICAL liar.

Delusional hypocrite.
I got the NUNES report /IG comes out soon.
If comeyc an make pure fabrications based on his hate, I can at least rely on that
 
look at them in office..which one lied to Congress?
which one lied to FISA judges?

Comey is a disgrace to the FBI and to his role. h's an embittered man, much like the Democrats/Hillary as a whole

This is pathetic.

Trump has literally thousands of documented lies. It's what he does.

Virtually NONE of the revelations I have heard so far from Comey's book sound fabricated or even outlandish. They sound like Trump. This is what we know about Trump anyway, for the most part.

I know people hate it when I bring up Iraq repeatedly, but at a certain point w/ that conflict, a whole lot of people had to be lying in order for Bush to be telling the truth. That's where Trump is right now: either just about everyone else is lying, or he is.

And we know he is. It's what he does.
 
Back
Top