Conservatives Outraged!

If I were truly interested enough, I'd create a following of socks as well to create an illusion of support. :rolleyes:

More on liberal anti-Semitism:

You can take a quiz here:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ept/2007/02/are_you_a_liberal_antisemite.html

Take this quiz and find out.
By Joe Lanzmann

After years of rising concern about left-wing anti-Semitism, the New York Times reported this week about a study for the American Jewish Committee. Written by professor Alvin Rosenfeld of Indiana University, the study describes the spread of a virulent anti-Zionism in many quarters on the left that has helped legitimate anti-Semitism. Some people have seized on the study to argue that these extreme anti-Zionists are really anti-Jewish bigots. Critics reply that criticizing Israel, even harshly, doesn't prove animus toward the Hebrew people.

So, how can you tell if you're a good liberal who simply thinks the West Bank settlements are bad policy—or a closet Judeophobe whose progressive views mask a serious attitude problem? Take this quiz and see.
 
Jewish = race? Seriously?

You morons think you're strutting around so much smarter and with superior morals than everyone else.

In actuality, you're goose-stepping around and thoughtlessly mouthing authoritarian platitudes your overlords feed you, and assure are intelligent and moral. In truth, they are old disproven ideas and far from moral.

From a prominent Jewish foundation;



Oxford University Press, 288 Pages, $24.95

In his new book, “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People,” Harry Ostrer, a medical geneticist and professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, claims that Jews are different, and the differences are not just skin deep. Jews exhibit, he writes, a distinctive genetic signature. Considering that the Nazis tried to exterminate Jews based on their supposed racial distinctiveness, such a conclusion might be a cause for concern. But Ostrer sees it as central to Jewish identity.

“Who is a Jew?” has been a poignant question for Jews throughout our history. It evokes a complex tapestry of Jewish identity made up of different strains of religious beliefs, cultural practices and blood ties to ancient Palestine and modern Israel. But the question, with its echoes of genetic determinism, also has a dark side.

Geneticists have long been aware that certain diseases, from breast cancer to Tay-Sachs, disproportionately affect Jews. Ostrer, who is also director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, goes further, maintaining that Jews are a homogeneous group with all the scientific trappings of what we used to call a “race.”
Related

Genes Tell Tale of Jewish Ties to Africa
The Ties That Bind
The Other Jewish Genetic Diseases

For most of the 3,000-year history of the Jewish people, the notion of what came to be known as “Jewish exceptionalism” was hardly controversial. Because of our history of inmarriage and cultural isolation, imposed or self-selected, Jews were considered by gentiles (and usually referred to themselves) as a “race.” Scholars from Josephus to Disraeli proudly proclaimed their membership in “the tribe.”

Ostrer explains how this concept took on special meaning in the 20th century, as genetics emerged as a viable scientific enterprise. Jewish distinctiveness might actually be measurable empirically. In “Legacy,” he first introduces us to Maurice Fishberg, an upwardly mobile Russian-Jewish immigrant to New York at the fin de siècle. Fishberg fervently embraced the anthropological fashion of the era, measuring skull sizes to explain why Jews seemed to be afflicted with more diseases than other groups — what he called the “peculiarities of the comparative pathology of the Jews.” It turns out that Fishberg and his contemporary phrenologists were wrong: Skull shape provides limited information about human differences. But his studies ushered in a century of research linking Jews to geneti

Read more: http://forward.com/articles/155742/jews-are-a-race-genes-reveal/?p=all#ixzz2wEPoJiyM
 
If I were truly interested enough, I'd create a following of socks as well to create an illusion of support. :rolleyes:

More on liberal anti-Semitism:

You can take a quiz here:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ept/2007/02/are_you_a_liberal_antisemite.html

This thread is about conservative reaction to a film about a slave. It's not about; jews, your wife, your martyr complex. You're a jew living in NY in 2014. Other than NY bankers, there no one on earth less persecuted. Sounds like you need therapy. You are nothing if not entertaining though. The court jester.
 
If I were truly interested enough, I'd create a following of socks as well to create an illusion of support. :rolleyes:

More on liberal anti-Semitism:

You can take a quiz here:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ept/2007/02/are_you_a_liberal_antisemite.html

Take this quiz and find out.
By Joe Lanzmann

After years of rising concern about left-wing anti-Semitism, the New York Times reported this week about a study for the American Jewish Committee. Written by professor Alvin Rosenfeld of Indiana University, the study describes the spread of a virulent anti-Zionism in many quarters on the left that has helped legitimate anti-Semitism. Some people have seized on the study to argue that these extreme anti-Zionists are really anti-Jewish bigots. Critics reply that criticizing Israel, even harshly, doesn't prove animus toward the Hebrew people.

So, how can you tell if you're a good liberal who simply thinks the West Bank settlements are bad policy—or a closet Judeophobe whose progressive views mask a serious attitude problem? Take this quiz and see.
 
If I were truly interested enough, I'd create a following of socks as well to create an illusion of support. :rolleyes:

More on liberal anti-Semitism:

You can take a quiz here:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ept/2007/02/are_you_a_liberal_antisemite.html

8-12: Phew! You're an unbigoted liberal—painfully capable of striking a middle ground and excruciatingly tolerant of all points of view. Please enjoy this complete set of Barack Obama's speeches.

You do realise that accusing liberals in general of anti-Semitism indicates extreme bias right?
 
Well sir, first of all, there is a picture of Darla and her Jewish schoolmate on Darla's page here on JPP.

Also, didn't you yourself claim that having a close relationship precluded bias?

Finally would you kindly point to whatever anti-Semitic comments you are referencing? In my opinion this group is not hateful.

I am afraid he has now been reduced to throwing anything at the wall to see what will stick, lol.

My liberal circle includes Jews, but we are all anti-Zionists.
 
So hanging around with Jews who also hate Jews somehow precludes anti-Semitism?

LOL! :awesome:
I don't hate Jews, I hate the policies that cause so much harm and destruction in the Middle East. The Arabs are also Semites, and most Jews, aren't these days. I think you are misguided in your "gotchas".
 
The Arabs are also Semites, and most Jews, aren't these days. I think you are misguided in your "gotchas".

Is this the best you can come up with?

That I can't call you "anti-Semitic" because most of the Jews you hate are not semites?

:awesome:
 
Last edited:
Is this the best you can come up with?

That I can't call you "anti-Semitic" because most the Jews you hate are not semites?

:awesome:

You may call me anything you wish. You may believe about me anything you wish. It does show a certain amount of desperation. You strike out at me because Rune calls you a racists.

If you wish to call me anti Semitic because I do not support certain policies of Israel, then fine.

Will you also call me anti American because I condemn our foreign policy and drones? didn't support Iraq or Afghanistan occupations, and hate GITMO?
 
It does show a certain amount of desperation. You strike out at me because Rune calls you a racists.

Eh, no. Rune is a retard who stares for hours at frozen orange juice because the label says "concentrate." He is incapable of arousing desperation within me.

I already stated my issue; I'm not impressed with selective outrage.

On this forum one may dub a conservative a "racist" or "pro slavery" based on nothing. When proof is requested, the request is ignored. Apparently the standard is mere disagreement and a "gut feeling."

However, turn the tables on liberals, and the Wicked Witch's Flying Monkey sock puppets come crawling out the darkest corners of cyber-space demanding "Where's the proof? Where's the proof?" Look back over these pages and you will see you can count yourself among those numbers.

Well, I disagree with you, Darla, and the other liberals here, and have a gut feeling you're a bunch of Jew haters.

You, Darla, and the others may argue ad nauseum, protest a lack of proof, however, that is the standard you yourselves established in this very thread. Your rules, I didn't make them. You did.

The irony is, you seem to view this in yourselves as some sort of evidence of enlightenment, intelligence, and sophistication. It's really nothing more than trolling, which as I demonstrated quite easily, I can do that more effectively than you can as well.

Initially I pursued intelligent discourse, and I was met with trolling. But that's OK. I'm still pretty new here and learning my way around. I can troll too. :awesome:
 
Last edited:
Eh, no. Rune is a retard who stares for hours at frozen orange juice because the label says "concentrate." He is incapable of arousing desperation within me.

I already stated my issue; I'm not impressed with selective outrage.

On this forum one may dub a conservative a "racist" or "pro slavery" based on nothing. When proof is requested, the request is ignored. Apparently the standard is mere disagreement and a "gut feeling."

However, turn the tables on liberals, and the Wicked Witch's Flying Monkey sock puppets come crawling out the darkest corners of cyber-space demanding "Where's the proof? Where's the proof?" Look back over these pages and you will see you can count yourself among those numbers.

Well, I disagree with you, Darla, and the other liberals here, and have a gut feeling you're a bunch of Jew haters.

You, Darla, and the others may argue ad nauseum, protest a lack of proof, however, that is the standard you yourselves established in this very thread. Your rules, I didn't make them. You did.

As the old sawhorse goes: you made your bed, not you gotta sleep in it.

So, you are basically acting childish, okay, I'm fine with that, it just ends all civil debate.

At least now I know how to approach you.
 
Click on her name in her post above, then click "view profile" This will bring you to her home page.

The picture of three beautiful women are; the Jewess, Darla, another friend I am unfamiliar with.

Thanks. A bit small, the picture, but attractive!
 
Off the top of my head? Hmmm, Jesse Jackson calling New York City "Hymietown."

Al Sharpton calling Jewish shop owners in Harlem "White interlopers, diamond merchants." (Firebombing occurred days later.)

You need more? I'm sure I can track down more.

Darla's a Jew hater?

(cough)
 
Back
Top