Given the following to which you agree:
Contract Killing is the requisitioned killing of a living human by a professional killer on behalf of a customer.
When presented with the following, you disagreed:
Abortion is the requisitioned killing of a living human by a professional killer on behalf of a customer who is a pregnant woman who wishes to place a hit on her own child while he is still in the womb.
You do not get to disagree as though it is somehow a subjective matter of opinion. You must refute the assertion, and the refutation cannot be that you simply don't like the implication of the assertion.
Abortion is an obvious proper subset of contract killing. You
still have not provided any examples of abortions that are not contract killings.
Ergo, here is where we
still stand: You approve of a proper subset of contract killing. Why do you approve of contract killings?
Here is the core of our problem. We can't agree on the definitions/usages/descriptions of certain words
Nope. We agree on the meanings of words. The problem in this discussion is your refusal to discuss contract killings, because you do not wish to broadcast your support for them. Your quibbling over irrelevancies is just one of your tactics.
Your current strategy is to claim that the killing of a living human is somehow not "killing". You need for me (and others) to believe that a rose by any other name is therefore not a rose anymore, i.e. that if you refer to the killing of a living human as a "termination" then you have somehow transformed the killing into a "not a killing." Obviously this is fallacious.
Why do you do this? You do this to shift the question away from "Why do you support contract killings?" to "Why is the killing of a living human somehow not the killing of a living human?" This effectively buys you time by shifting the focus away from your support for contract killings, at least for a few posts and affords you additional opportunities to pretend that your refusal to answer my question is somehow a result of my refusal to recognize Wikipedia as anything other than an error-filled, non-authoritative source of Marxist indoctrination, i.e. you wish to pin the blame on me for your EVASION of the question:
Why do you support contract killings?