Cop who arrested black scholar is profiling expert

USFREEDOM911 said:
Do you have a statement that shows they were saying the incident was "regrettable and unfortunet" from what they did, or is it possible that it was "regrettable and unfortunet" that the Prof acted like an idiot?
Click to expand...

I posted the entire content of the department's statement which called the incident "regrettable and unfortunate."

You're simply looking for excuses and trying to redefine a very clear statement from the department.

No police department calls proper actions from one of their officers either regrettable or unfortunate.

The department did not need this and a smarter officer would have avoided it by not exploding it into what it has become.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then you don't feel it was STUPID for the Prof. to act the way he did, in an enviroment where racial tensions already existed??
Click to expand...

NO, HELL NO, I do not.

The professor does not work for the police department .. the police department works for him and he helps pay them with his taxes.

This cop knew the environment in which he was working .. even to the point of him being a profiling instructor.

WHY DO YOU THING A PROFILING INSTRUCTOR IS NEEDED? Missing from your argument is the justification for the anger, resentment, and mistrust of the police that is shared by people of color. If the police show up at my house and I know no crime has been committed .. why in the fuck are you here.

Are you willing to bet that his department hasn't already told him that he could have handled this situation better? Are you aware that a similar incident occured in the same area invoiling this department and another professional African-American .. which precipitated the need for a goddamn "profiling instructor?"

Knowing this as this officer did .. was it smart to escalate this victimless incident any further .. especially after he found out who this person was?

The bottom line is that the charges were dropped with the quickness .. THUS validating the obvious .. it was a stupid thing to do.
 
Last edited:
blackascoal said:
I posted the entire content of the department's statement which called the incident "regrettable and unfortunate."

You're simply looking for excuses and trying to redefine a very clear statement from the department.

No police department calls proper actions from one of their officers either regrettable or unfortunate.

The department did not need this and a smarter officer would have avoided it by not exploding it into what it has become.
Click to expand...

yet the top cop defended crowley's actions 100%....i'm sure what is regrettable is the national hoopla and probable issues in race matters now

a more intelligence and truthful professor would not have exploited the situation for his own gain
 
belme1201 said:
You were there? I notice that you, who so vehemently denounces "racism" when discussed by the other side, seem to be, miraculously, around when you are attempting to turn the racism discussion to your own way of thinking. I presume, given your expertice, that you speak having experienced bigotry and profiling?
Click to expand...

show me the racism.....

you guys are so blind that you call racism just because the prof is black....that is absolute bullcrap and has no basis in fact....so everytime something happens to a black person by a white person....it must be racist

:rolleyes:
 
Yurt said:
yet the top cop defended crowley's actions 100%....i'm sure what is regrettable is the national hoopla and probable issues in race matters now

a more intelligence and truthful professor would not have exploited the situation for his own gain
Click to expand...

If he was "exploiting it for his own gain" why wouldn't he do it?

Did he call the police to his house?

Surely that must be what you're implying.
 
blackascoal said:
If he was "exploiting it for his own gain" why wouldn't he do it?

Did he call the police to his house?

Surely that must be what you're implying.
Click to expand...

no, he saw the situation as it came....immediately starts yelling racism....for what reason? what was racist in the very beginning, oh i see...a white cop showing up at a black person's house for suspiciion of burglary must be racist? according to what we know....absolutely nothing....from the picture is saw....he is handcuffed in the front, not back and appears to be hamming it up...

come on, the very next day he just so happens to want to write a book about it...
 
tinfoil said:
Bullshit! that uppity negro wanted this shit. He immediately started yelling about how this was what happens to black men in america.

well fuck that shit. white people are losing promotions because black people are too stupid to pass tests.

here's the racist test
http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-city-firefighter-examinations#p=1

LOL I bet you can't point out one question that's racist.
The claim is that blacks don't get as much practice as those white folks.

bwahahaha get off the corner sipping 40's with your homies you losers
Click to expand...
What is up with you?
 
Yurt said:
show me the racism.....

you guys are so blind that you call racism just because the prof is black....that is absolute bullcrap and has no basis in fact....so everytime something happens to a black person by a white person....it must be racist

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Perhaps you can provide an up to date definition of profiling and whether it exists? It is used by you in post #1 and the thread title.
 
belme1201 said:
Yurt said:
show me the racism.....

you guys are so blind that you call racism just because the prof is black....that is absolute bullcrap and has no basis in fact....so everytime something happens to a black person by a white person....it must be racist

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Perhaps you can provide an up to date definition of profiling and whether it exists? It is used by you in post #1 and the thread title.
Click to expand...

why don't you look it up...or ask the cop as he seems to be an expert on it
 
blackascoal said:
I posted the entire content of the department's statement which called the incident "regrettable and unfortunate."

You're simply looking for excuses and trying to redefine a very clear statement from the department.

No police department calls proper actions from one of their officers either regrettable or unfortunate.

The department did not need this and a smarter officer would have avoided it by not exploding it into what it has become.
Click to expand...

I didn't see anything where they said that THE OFFICERS behavior was "regrettable and unfortunate".
The said the incident and the Prof was an instrumental part of the incident.

You and the rest of the enablers are only looking for excuses to forgive the Prof's behavior and the redefining appears to be coming from you.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I didn't see anything where they said that THE OFFICERS behavior was "regrettable and unfortunate".
The said the incident and the Prof was an instrumental part of the incident.

You and the rest of the enablers are only looking for excuses to forgive the Prof's behavior and the redefining appears to be coming from you.
Click to expand...

Gates needs no excuse for being an acomplished innocent citizen .. AND, AND, AND .. he needs no excuse for the false charge which was immediately DROPPED.

The only ones looking for excuses is the cop and those who defend him.

Imagine arresting someone and the charge gets immediately DROPPED.

Who needs excuses?
 
blackascoal said:
NO, HELL NO, I do not.

The professor does not work for the police department .. the police department works for him and he helps pay them with his taxes.

This cop knew the environment in which he was working .. even to the point of him being a profiling instructor.

WHY DO YOU THING A PROFILING INSTRUCTOR IS NEEDED? Missing from your argument is the justification for the anger, resentment, and mistrust of the police that is shared by people of color. If the police show up at my house and I know no crime has been committed .. why in the fuck are you here.

Are you willing to bet that his department hasn't already told him that he could have handled this situation better? Are you aware that a similar incident occured in the same area invoiling this department and another professional African-American .. which precipitated the need for a goddamn "profiling instructor?"

Knowing this as this officer did .. was it smart to escalate this victimless incident any further .. especially after he found out who this person was?

The bottom line is that the charges were dropped with the quickness .. THUS validating the obvious .. it was a stupid thing to do.
Click to expand...

1. Your first sentence has nothing to do with the matter at hand; because they work for the ENTIRE community and part of their job is to investigate reported criminal activity, which they did.

2. And the Prof also was aware of how things were, so maybe he should have been a little more civil; instead of escalating a situation that you're saying allready existed

3. This would appear to be your problem and the problem of anyone that thinks like you do. It's not the problem of the Police. Own you own.

4. Do you have any proof and one time does not make something a common practice.

5. Why did the Prof escalate this vicimless situation and just comply??

6. Charges were probably dropped; because the Prof apologized for acting like an idiot.

Unless you have something that PROVES your suppostions, regarding the Prof, that's all they are.
Suppositions and aren't proof of anything.
 
Stepping back, it boggles the mind that there is this much dispute over whether it was appropriate to arrest a black man at his house for being uppity, let alone whether the arrest was "stupid."

I'm not inclined to discuss this much further.
 
blackascoal said:
If he was "exploiting it for his own gain" why wouldn't he do it?

Did he call the police to his house?

Surely that must be what you're implying.
Click to expand...

HEY, you may be onto something.

Using supposition, he probably did call them to his own house (by having an accomplise to it) and then exploited the situation to his supposed advantage.

Thanks for throwing this out there.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
1. Your first sentence has nothing to do with the matter at hand; because they work for the ENTIRE community and part of their job is to investigate reported criminal activity, which they did.

2. And the Prof also was aware of how things were, so maybe he should have been a little more civil; instead of escalating a situation that you're saying allready existed

3. This would appear to be your problem and the problem of anyone that thinks like you do. It's not the problem of the Police. Own you own.

4. Do you have any proof and one time does not make something a common practice.

5. Why did the Prof escalate this vicimless situation and just comply??

6. Charges were probably dropped; because the Prof apologized for acting like an idiot.

Unless you have something that PROVES your suppostions, regarding the Prof, that's all they are.
Suppositions and aren't proof of anything.
Click to expand...

Ain't my job to make you smarter.

You can believe whatever you choose to believe but you look foolish talking about "suppositions" when you have no proof that Gates apologized at all.

DO YOU?

The charges were dropped because they were unfounded and an embarrassment to the department.

But believe whatever you choose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top