Cops have no constitutional duty to protect you

So you believe cops are Constitutionally bound to protect us? What makes you say that?

stop gaslighting, fucking POS liar. you already know what i've been posting for years. YEARS. it's hilarious that only NOW do you have a problem with it, or is it that you find you can blame the current scotus for something that was ruled on in 1989??????
 
this is what I mean by stupid assed assumptions, or just outright lies.....you still insist that stewie is my 'buddy', and either willfully ignore what I said about the 3%ers, or you're a fucking troll...either way, I don't care about your lying ass anymore

Are you denying you know him like Peter denied knowing Jesus? LOL


Son, you never cared about me. You've been spreading lies about me since almost day one. You don't like officers, you don't like the Marine Corps and you don't like the US government. You support the overthrow of our country and consider any Americans killed along the way to be "collateral damage".

I'm just curious why you didn't attend the Insurrection. Had to wash your hair?
 
so you 'assume' I refuse to participate

Yeah, because you won't get your way due to your childish nature.


or the contempt for representative government.

You have repeatedly said over and over how much you hate our government.


and apparently your drug addled memory is as bad as dutchs for my reasons of NOT being in that group anymore.

I didn't say you were still in that group, I said you were in that group until like a year ago, and your reasons for leaving had nothing to do with the group's hateful positions.

But I also know that once someone joins one of those groups, they never truly leave them because they still maintain contact with their friends in it.

I believe you are still in contact with those people and that they told you their plan was to attack the Capitol because they wanted you to join them.
 
They may not have a Constitutional duty, but they do agree to the work conditions. If their job is not to protect in situations like Uvalde then why have a police force? Just have an agency that investigates crimes.
 
Analyze what happened

We already know what happened and why it happened.

What we don't know is why the cops just stood there...I mean, we do know why...they have no Constitutional duty to protect us and that all cops are gigantic pussies.

But the reason they chose not to act that day is what should be investigated.


Identify mistakes and make corrections.

In other words, cover it up.

We already know what the mistakes were: easy access to guns, police cowardice...how do those things get corrected without defunding and dismantling the entire department?


If there were crimes or negligence on the part of some people, those will be addressed.

Do you honestly believe that the people investigating themselves will provide an objective report on their failures, even after they've already been caught lying and trying to cover shit up?


You hate the police, you lie about the police and then you expect the police to protect you. Interesting.

I haven't said a single lie about the police.

Not one.

All I've said are that cops are fucking cowards, have no Constitutional duty to protect us, and commit far more crimes than they've ever solved.
 
already asked a dozen times and answered a dozen fucking times...........now PROVE your bullshit accusations

If I do this, and go into your posts during that time period, and I uncover posts from you questioning the 2020 election, what are you going to do?

Are you going to apologize for bullshitting?

Are you going to deny the words you wrote?

Did you say that mail balloting is fraudulent? I seem to remember you were arguing that in particular in late 2020.
 
Yeah, because you won't get your way due to your childish nature.
what bullshit, you pedantic little fuckstick. participation is voting. I vote. you simply don't like how I vote, so fuck yourself

You have repeatedly said over and over how much you hate our government.
so? the government over the last near century has been a tyrannical beast infringing on all of our rights. instead of seeing that big picture, you like to point fingers and accuse others of not doing something that you yourself don't have the courage to do.

I didn't say you were still in that group, I said you were in that group until like a year ago, and your reasons for leaving had nothing to do with the group's hateful positions.

But I also know that once someone joins one of those groups, they never truly leave them because they still maintain contact with their friends in it.

I believe you are still in contact with those people and that they told you their plan was to attack the Capitol because they wanted you to join them.

well, you certainly have every right to be the idiot you currently are..........what exactly did that bullshit college degree give you other than a seriously overblown sense of superiority you don't deserve?
 
They may not have a Constitutional duty, but they do agree to the work conditions. If their job is not to protect in situations like Uvalde then why have a police force? Just have an agency that investigates crimes.

It was their duty to go after the shooter. However, there is a chain of command. If some idiot just rushed into a hostage situation, he could get everyone killed.

Once they had the forces massed, they should have attacked. IDK why they waited but suspect it was a chain of command or jurisdiction issue. The investigation by all parties (from the town, the state and the Feds) will reveal what mistakes were made and how to correct them.

No one wants this situation to ever happen again.
 
Are you denying you know him like Peter denied knowing Jesus? LOL

Son, you never cared about me. You've been spreading lies about me since almost day one. You don't like officers, you don't like the Marine Corps and you don't like the US government. You support the overthrow of our country and consider any Americans killed along the way to be "collateral damage".

I'm just curious why you didn't attend the Insurrection. Had to wash your hair?

more asinine assumptions..............you're not interested in anything other than lying and trolling.
 
If I do this, and go into your posts during that time period, and I uncover posts from you questioning the 2020 election, what are you going to do?

Are you going to apologize for bullshitting?

Are you going to deny the words you wrote?

Did you say that mail balloting is fraudulent? I seem to remember you were arguing that in particular in late 2020.

I have absolutely no concern you'll find anything of any such nature
 
We already know what happened and why it happened.

What we don't know is why the cops just stood there...I mean, we do know why...they have no Constitutional duty to protect us and that all cops are gigantic pussies.

But the reason they chose not to act that day is what should be investigated.




In other words, cover it up.

We already know what the mistakes were: easy access to guns, police cowardice...how do those things get corrected without defunding and dismantling the entire department?




Do you honestly believe that the people investigating themselves will provide an objective report on their failures, even after they've already been caught lying and trying to cover shit up?




I haven't said a single lie about the police.

Not one.

All I've said are that cops are fucking cowards, have no Constitutional duty to protect us, and commit far more crimes than they've ever solved.
You're defending cowards for no fucking reason.

You have no reason to defend the police because they have no obligation to defend you.


In fact, I doubt you'd be able to supervise anything that requires sound judgement since you strike me as being far too emotional and, TBH, a bit unstable.
 
stop gaslighting, fucking POS liar.

You accused me of lying when I posted the NYT article talking about how your Conservative Nazi judges on SCOTUS decided cops aren't Constitutionally bound to protect us.

So where's the lie and how am I gaslighting you when you're the one who wrote the shit you post?
 
Cracka pleez,

You white libs have been doing everything you can to destroy law and order. You want to create chaos. Then you will claim we need a federal Gestapo force to control American citizens.

Similar to the leftist gestapo agent that murdered Ashli Babbitt for trespassing. He was soooo brave, according to leftists. :palm:
 
They may not have a Constitutional duty, but they do agree to the work conditions. If their job is not to protect in situations like Uvalde then why have a police force? Just have an agency that investigates crimes.

Cops commit far more crimes than they ever solve.
 
If I do this, and go into your posts during that time period, and I uncover posts from you questioning the 2020 election, what are you going to do?

Are you going to apologize for bullshitting?

Are you going to deny the words you wrote?

Did you say that mail balloting is fraudulent? I seem to remember you were arguing that in particular in late 2020.

my EXACT words were the POTENTIAL for fraud. your memory is shit.
 
It was their duty to go after the shooter. However, there is a chain of command. If some idiot just rushed into a hostage situation, he could get everyone killed.

Once they had the forces massed, they should have attacked. IDK why they waited but suspect it was a chain of command or jurisdiction issue. The investigation by all parties (from the town, the state and the Feds) will reveal what mistakes were made and how to correct them.

No one wants this situation to ever happen again.
It seems to me, they have no obligation to do anything in these situations, according to the Supreme Court, doesn’t matter who’s in charge, they don’t have to respond. It’s not their duty, according to SCOTUS.
 
You accused me of lying when I posted the NYT article talking about how your Conservative Nazi judges on SCOTUS decided cops aren't Constitutionally bound to protect us.

So where's the lie and how am I gaslighting you when you're the one who wrote the shit you post?

yes, because you're a fucking liar. you post an article that details a 2008 case, one I posted about back in 2008, but you also IGNORE, like a leftist stooge, that the ORIGINAL case decided in 1989......why would that be?
 
Back
Top