cops murder doctor in his own home

[SmarterthanYou]

So your concept of "law" is sorted out in gunfights?

is there a real concept of law if the government doesn't follow it???????

 

[Into the Night]

I never said that

Correct. You ignored it.

 

[Into the Night]

again, you should just say that you'll give government all benefit of the doubt, regardless of the laws;..........you really have no clue about the Constitution either, so stop referencing it

Oddly enough, Wally is right here. Your home will not protect you from an arrest warrant.

 

[Into the Night]

lets make this fine line...............if the cops actually had a warrant, they did NOT NEED to sit outside and coax the homeowner outside,

Correct. They didn't need to sit outside and coax the homeowner outside. He was being arrested.

where his constitutional protections were lesser than inside the home.

The Constitution isn't 'protections'. It applies to what laws government can pass, not citizens. Nothing in the Constitution changes depending on your location.

Had those officers actually had a warrant,

They did.

Supreme Court precedence had given them power to enter that home to effect the arrest, so why didn't they immediately enter the home to affect the arrest?

I assume they thought there was no need, at least until he resisted arrest.

dont question me on the law, I'm 90% better educated than you on the law

Illiteracy: Sentences begin with capital letters.
Argument from randU fallacy. Elitism.
You have obviously ignored the authority of police to conduct an arrest. You don't know where that authority comes from, and you obviously don't know the law here.

 

[Into the Night]

is there a real concept of law if the government doesn't follow it???????

Yes. Even with a rogue government. The law still exists unchanged.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Correct. You ignored it.

then you're wrong.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Oddly enough, Wally is right here. Your home will not protect you from an arrest warrant.

I never said that. what I said is that if the cops had an arrest warrant, they would not have let the home boundary stop them. how hard is that to understand?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Correct. They didn't need to sit outside and coax the homeowner outside. He was being arrested.

The Constitution isn't 'protections'. It applies to what laws government can pass, not citizens. Nothing in the Constitution changes depending on your location.

They did.

I assume they thought there was no need, at least until he resisted arrest.

Illiteracy: Sentences begin with capital letters.
Argument from randU fallacy. Elitism.
You have obviously ignored the authority of police to conduct an arrest. You don't know where that authority comes from, and you obviously don't know the law here.

grammar nazi aside, and you've made the case before, if cops have a warrant, they do not need to respect the boundaries of the home, which is what these cops felt compelled to do until the ROOKIE made a mistake. but at least we know you are still a badge blower and bow down to government authority, right or wrong

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yes. Even with a rogue government. The law still exists unchanged.

and your position when the government ignores the law??????

 

[Into the Night]

then you're wrong.

Why am I wrong because I agreed with you??

 

[Into the Night]

I never said that.

I know.

what I said is that if the cops had an arrest warrant, they would not have let the home boundary stop them. how hard is that to understand?

They didn't let a home boundary stop them. Are you trying to deny your own posts now??