Could Iraq have been dealt with for only $1Bn?

You made a very strong statement on howyou saw so much 'F'd up shit' I just asked you to elaborate...is that so hard?

Yup.

You can trust me or not. I don't care. My point was that your attack on my age was unwarranted and immature.
 
Last edited:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/...ked+Bush+for+$1bn+to+go+into+exile/article.do

Saddam asked Bush for $1bn to go into exile
27.09.07

Saddam Hussein offered to step down and go into exile one month before the invasion of Iraq, it was claimed last night.

Fearing defeat, Saddam was prepared to go peacefully in return for £500million ($1billion).

The extraordinary offer was revealed yesterday in a transcript of talks in February 2003 between George Bush and the then Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar at the President's Texas ranch.

The White House refused to comment on the report last night.

But, if verified, it is certain to raise questions in Washington and London over whether the costly four-year war could have been averted.

More at link...

Oh, this is too much...one billion and we could have saved the lives of so many! To me it would have been a worthwhile investment. Was he going to take the boys with him?
 
Oh, this is too much...one billion and we could have saved the lives of so many! To me it would have been a worthwhile investment. Was he going to take the boys with him?

If Bush seriously permitted this opportunity to avoid bloodshed to slip by, then he should be tried as a traitor.
 
As the old saying goes...........

Yup.

I'm not doing it on a message board. You can trust me or not. I don't care. My point was that your attack on my age was unwarranted and immature.


Put up or shut up...I put up and take hits...why can't you and your ilk?
 
Don't say stuff like that here sf, a certain poster will report you to the ss. I wouldn't be surprised anyway

yeah you do not have to report anyone, all net traffic is scanned for certain phrases and such and stored away for review by humans....
 
without proof of the 'allegation'..this is what is referred to as 'Hear say' in all courts of law!
And by the way the article did not say if GW refused the propostition...only speculation on cause and effect...maybe taken out of context..ie: sound bites...!


and no darla I did not report SF to the SS...they monitor all Internet sites...I am retired...remember?

Umm the invasion of Iraq was based on 'hear say' ....
 
Exactly.

Impeach tomorrow if this is true. Though your other plan might not be a bad one :).

If this is true, it really shows the true colors on the man.

He could have avoided a war at the cost of a few billion, but oil and the Bush family vendetta against saddam pushed this madman into dragging us into a disasterous war.

Has anyone apologized yet, for voting for bush? :cof1:
 
If this is true, it really shows the true colors on the man.

He could have avoided a war at the cost of a few billion, but oil and the Bush family vendetta against saddam pushed this madman into dragging us into a disasterous war.

Has anyone apologized yet, for voting for bush? :cof1:

Man you always throw these vague accusations at me. Show me where I have stated unwavering support for Bush or this war.
 
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/...ked+Bush+for+$1bn+to+go+into+exile/article.do

Saddam asked Bush for $1bn to go into exile
27.09.07

Saddam Hussein offered to step down and go into exile one month before the invasion of Iraq, it was claimed last night.

Fearing defeat, Saddam was prepared to go peacefully in return for £500million ($1billion).

The extraordinary offer was revealed yesterday in a transcript of talks in February 2003 between George Bush and the then Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar at the President's Texas ranch.

The White House refused to comment on the report last night.

But, if verified, it is certain to raise questions in Washington and London over whether the costly four-year war could have been averted.

More at link...


More millionares than ever before. :clink:
 
Back
Top