Coulter Bagged by Media Matters

Save your money - her sales mostly come in bulk sales anyway, and are denoted as such on bestseller lists.

Con organizations buy her shit in bulk, to put her on the lists, an dthen hand her shit out as a door prize and various con events. You can totally get it for free.
Well, I'll donate to the con organization who promises to buy the most copies. Can't have another American out of a job now, can we?
 
She got canned mainly because when she can't combat a liberal viewpoint if it's a guy she's debating she calls him gay.
Mathews got tired of this gutter bitch and said "we can't get anybody more interesting than her" and of course the answer was of course we can.
 
She got canned mainly because when she can't combat a liberal viewpoint if it's a guy she's debating she calls him gay.
Mathews got tired of this gutter bitch and said "we can't get anybody more interesting than her" and of course the answer was of course we can.

She's deranged. She was on CBS this morning and the guy interviewing her had to tell her to please calm down. I mean, she is just whacked. I think it's hysterical. Listen, it's good advertising for liberalism I will tell you that!
 
Word, she appeals to the radical right which is shrinking like super freaks customer base of little old ladies to rip off.
 
sure he's a salesman and the customer base is running out of money and away from Madoff clones like him. He has been exceedingly pissy lately, I feel sorry for him.
 
When did nbc say that? That is the official nbc position? Can you give me a link for that I'd like to read it. I would understand it's market politics, the guy has the highest approval rating for any incoming President in history. But I still believe that dissent is important.

I believed that back when NBC let go Phil Donahue, who had the highest ratings of any MSNBC show at that time, a decision which a released internal memo showed was made because "it's not good for us to have someone on who is against this (Iraq) war".

Hey, did you?

Or are you a whinely come lately? Can I guess?

Here you go

But one network insider claims it was the book's theme -- a brutal examination of liberal bias in the new era -- that got executives to dis-invite the controversialist.

"We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," a TODAY insider reveals. "It's such a downer. It's just not the time, and it's not what our audience wants, either."

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashacn.htm
 
Here you go

But one network insider claims it was the book's theme -- a brutal examination of liberal bias in the new era -- that got executives to dis-invite the controversialist.

"We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," a TODAY insider reveals. "It's such a downer. It's just not the time, and it's not what our audience wants, either."

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashacn.htm

Unnamed "insiders", eh?

It's hardly deep throat is it?
 
Overarm for power but, on the other hand, underarm does bring the added assurance of accuracy.

It is a conundrum alright.

LMAO!

Now this is funny. Thank you, Charver. Best post in the thread.
 
Here you go

But one network insider claims it was the book's theme -- a brutal examination of liberal bias in the new era -- that got executives to dis-invite the controversialist.

"We are just not interested in anyone so highly critical of President-elect Obama, right now," a TODAY insider reveals. "It's such a downer. It's just not the time, and it's not what our audience wants, either."

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashacn.htm

LMAO
 
Remember the Dixie Chicks and the right wingers?

Already addressed that. That insulted their country overseas during war - like alot of libs did.

They are singers not political oped writers

The liberal media gave them glowing coverage and had them on all the morning shows

If you bash Pres Bush and America you are heros to to the left and are treated accordingly
 
Back
Top