Dan Bongino says Epstein killed himself.

I always believed he killed himself, what I point out is the fact that they facilitated his suicide. They "check" late, they left him with sheets, etc. that they would not have had if he had remained on suicide watch. The most visible prisoner in the prison due to infamy, and they dropped the ball, and the timing seemed to suggest it was done with purpose.

He was hours away from suicide watch, he's moved to the Special Housing Unit from the cell they use for those on suicide watch (those cells usually have no anchor points, no exposed pipes, usually the bed is a mattress on the floor either with no sheets or with tear resistant sheets that are designed to make it difficult to fashion a noose), and the guards didn't follow the checks schedule. The Special Housing Unit has bunks to anchor to, regular bedsheets, sharp corners on some fixtures, etc. and is unlike the suicide watch cells.
They certainly didn't seem to really care if he killed himself.
 
How come you don't know?

I can also tell you who was in charge of the department, but that really doesn't reflect who created the atmosphere in which he committed suicide.
I know, I was making a point. You know that.

My point is that if we are going to start making accusations and allegations, we should start with who is in charge.

The mindless idiots on this board immediately started blaming Hillary Clinton. The stupidity is amazing. Trump had more control over the situation than anyone they were accusing.
 

He is a Trumpper, do you believe him, or are you still claiming it was Hillary?
I must’ve missed this whole saga on this forum. Is this case just another instance of leftists reflexively rejecting anything said by someone outside their bubble? Are there groups out there defending Epstein, dismissing the idea that powerful people might have wanted him silenced as some wild conspiracy? I’m honestly in the dark here.

I can see why people might point to Hillary, her circle does seem to have an unusually high body count, with more “suicides” than most of us see in our own lives, and Bill was undeniably tight with Epstein, a frequent flyer on his plane. Still, Hillary’s just one of many who might have had motives to take him out if given the chance.

The prison situation didn’t help, plenty of odd oversights and questionable circumstances there. So, I’m curious: do these same leftists have the same defensive attitude or support networks for Epstein as they do for someone like Luigi Mangione, the CEO shooter? I’m genuinely clueless here.

It is nice to have someone in the FBI that hasn't given us reasons to doubt him yet. Of course, for libtards, just being a Republican is an immediate disqualifier, but that's your problem. For now, unless more evidence surfaces, I'll accept the findings.
 
I know, I was making a point. You know that.

My point is that if we are going to start making accusations and allegations, we should start with who is in charge.

The mindless idiots on this board immediately started blaming Hillary Clinton. The stupidity is amazing. Trump had more control over the situation than anyone they were accusing.
That would depend entirely on who was hired during their tenure, however I don't think Hillary had anything to do with it, though I do believe that there was nefarious purpose to ignoring him, and in removing him from suicide watch. I doubt that Barr had anything to do with it any more than I think Hillary did. I think someone did though...

The guards were charged and convicted, they did not roll on whomever may have got them to neglect their duties that evening for 30 minute checks that they were falsifying... Whatever they were promised seems to be enough to lose their job over, though none of them faced any time in prison or jail, they got community service (100 hours to be exact).
 
I must’ve missed this whole saga on this forum. Is this case just another instance of leftists reflexively rejecting anything said by someone outside their bubble? Are there groups out there defending Epstein, dismissing the idea that powerful people might have wanted him silenced as some wild conspiracy? I’m honestly in the dark here.

I can see why people might point to Hillary, her circle does seem to have an unusually high body count, with more “suicides” than most of us see in our own lives, and Bill was undeniably tight with Epstein, a frequent flyer on his plane. Still, Hillary’s just one of many who might have had motives to take him out if given the chance.

The prison situation didn’t help, plenty of odd oversights and questionable circumstances there. So, I’m curious: do these same leftists have the same defensive attitude or support networks for Epstein as they do for someone like Luigi Mangione, the CEO shooter? I’m genuinely clueless here.

It is nice to have someone in the FBI that hasn't given us reasons to doubt him yet. Of course, for libtards, just being a Republican is an immediate disqualifier, but that's your problem. For now, unless more evidence surfaces, I'll accept the findings.
lol.

dumb zionist thinks authority figures never lie.

lol.
 
That would depend entirely on who was hired during their tenure, however I don't think Hillary had anything to do with it, though I do believe that there was nefarious purpose to ignoring him, and in removing him from suicide watch. I doubt that Barr had anything to do with it any more than I think Hillary did. I think someone did though...

The guards were charged and convicted, they did not roll on whomever may have got them to neglect their duties that evening for 30 minute checks that they were falsifying... Whatever they were promised seems to be enough to lose their job over, though none of them faced any time in prison or jail, they got community service (100 hours to be exact).
he's a kompromat agent who got his burn notice.
 
I must’ve missed this whole saga on this forum. Is this case just another instance of leftists reflexively rejecting anything said by someone outside their bubble? Are there groups out there defending Epstein, dismissing the idea that powerful people might have wanted him silenced as some wild conspiracy? I’m honestly in the dark here.

I can see why people might point to Hillary, her circle does seem to have an unusually high body count, with more “suicides” than most of us see in our own lives, and Bill was undeniably tight with Epstein, a frequent flyer on his plane. Still, Hillary’s just one of many who might have had motives to take him out if given the chance.

The prison situation didn’t help, plenty of odd oversights and questionable circumstances there. So, I’m curious: do these same leftists have the same defensive attitude or support networks for Epstein as they do for someone like Luigi Mangione, the CEO shooter? I’m genuinely clueless here.

It is nice to have someone in the FBI that hasn't given us reasons to doubt him yet. Of course, for libtards, just being a Republican is an immediate disqualifier, but that's your problem. For now, unless more evidence surfaces, I'll accept the findings.
Now that ilk will hate him, just watch.
 
That would depend entirely on who was hired during their tenure, however I don't think Hillary had anything to do with it, though I do believe that there was nefarious purpose to ignoring him, and in removing him from suicide watch. I doubt that Barr had anything to do with it any more than I think Hillary did. I think someone did though...

The guards were charged and convicted, they did not roll on whomever may have got them to neglect their duties that evening for 30 minute checks that they were falsifying... Whatever they were promised seems to be enough to lose their job over, though none of them faced any time in prison or jail, they got community service (100 hours to be exact).
I think it is very likely they knew he was suicidal and left him alone to do what he wanted. Maybe even told him how to get it done...

But, I think the kneejerk reaction of MAGA to blame their political opponents without any evidence is very bad for our nation. Venerable people believe it and use it for justification to take action against their perceived political opponents.

Dont get me wrong, the Democrats have done this type of shit also, just not to such an extreme. Its bad when anyone does it.
 
lol.

dumb zionist thinks authority figures never lie.

lol.
Question: Can you define Zionist, you retarded ape? And how you think my comment suggest I think authority figures never lie points to the answer to my question, which of course is no. Surprise me for once.

Bogino hasn't given me a reason to distrust him yet. Unlike you, most people aren't strung out on cocaine or meth peeking out the window at a world out to get them, lol. They trust but verify until that verification doesn't pan out, then it's goodbye to the trust thing.
 
Back
Top