The comparison is unquestioning obidence and loyality.
Godwin's law doesn't apply here. You need to read the law.
I've also posted other pictures of NK, China and USSR rallies.
Das Reichserntedankfest
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
The comparison is unquestioning obidence and loyality.
Godwin's law doesn't apply here. You need to read the law.
I've also posted other pictures of NK, China and USSR rallies.
You posted a photo of a nazi rally in the OP. The comparison was obvious. Godwin’s Law applies.
Too late. According to the law you already lost the argument in the OP.
You can start a new thread.
Sorry Charlie. No cigar for you.
T. A. is just buttsore for being included as one of those fiercely loyal Trump supporters who would be willing to do anything Trump says. 1/6 demonstrated that.
Agreed but you referenced nazis in the OP. Yes, as the argument extends in time the probability of reference to nazis increases. But you defied the probabilities by referencing nazis in the OP. You lost the argument quicker than normal.
I suggest you start a new thread. You’ve already lost in the one.
The Reich Harvest Thanksgiving Festival (German: Das Reichserntedankfest) was a monumental Nazi German celebration of the peasantry and the German farmers. The festivals ran from 1933 to 1937 on the Bückeberg, a hill near the town of Hamelin. Most festivals occurred every October, with the 1934 festival commencing 30 September. The official purpose of the festival was the recognition of the achievements of the German farmers, whom the Nazis called the Reichsnährstand (the Reich's Food Estate). The celebration was also used by the Nazis as a propaganda tool to showcase the connection between Führer Adolf Hitler and the German people. The festival was part of a cycle of Nazi celebrations which included the annual party rally at Nuremberg, Hitler's birthday celebrations and other important events on the Nazi calendar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reich_Harvest_Thanksgiving_Festival
Is that an attempt at correcting the OP?
That is not what Godwin's law says. It says nothing about starting a discussion about Nazis. Read the law!!!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
You started off by invoking it. That's extremely quick progress. Oh, and it's obvious you don't have a sense of humor if you think I responded out of "butthurt" about Trump. I responded because it was fun to do so.
Ah so you were trolling my OP? Got it.
And apparently you missed the part: "regardless of the original topic".
If I started a thread comparing Kim Jong-un to Hitler, is that a example of Godwin's law?
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Godwin's law itself can be applied mistakenly or abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Ah so you were trolling my OP? Got it.
And apparently you missed the part: "regardless of the original topic".
If I started a thread comparing Kim Jong-un to Hitler, is that a example of Godwin's law?
Yes. Kim Jong Un is completely different from Hitler. He's more like a medieval despot than anything else. I bet he'd have people burned at the stake (like a steak?) just for deigning to look at him as he passed by...
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
But you didn't Mr. Godwin's Law violator!So, go surf some porn or something!
If he violated the law, then have him arrested.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
It can be, but wasn't here. It was a clearly valid application of it.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I stopped the development of this thread, thus arrested his development, something I'm sure his grade school teachers noted about him too...
Nope. In order for it to be valid, someone has to bring up the comparison later in the thread. Apparently you have severe reading comprehension.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Not true. You can start off with an improper Hitler comparison too, just as you did.
Nope. That is not what the law says. You need to read it again, slowly.
Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of Nazi analogies, is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer (regardless of topic or scope), the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Adolf Hitler becomes more likely.
Read it a few times slowly.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
In December 2015, Godwin commented on the Nazi and fascist comparisons being made by several articles about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, saying: "If you're thoughtful about it and show some real awareness of history, go ahead and refer to Hitler when you talk about Trump, or any other politician."[12] In August 2017, Godwin made similar remarks on social networking websites Facebook and Twitter with respect to the two previous days' Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, endorsing and encouraging comparisons of its alt-right organizers to Nazis.[13][14][15][16]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
LOL. That's a sick rekt.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
It just goes to show just how loosely this rule is applied.