Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....
classic
classic
Seriously, his "evidence" was a poll from Rasmussen that wasn't "in the positive" for Bush, another link that listed polls that didn't include Rasmussen, and a last link that was a blog dude giving his self-same opinion without evidence.it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....
classic
You want me to show you where you are in error, when you've shown nothing but your own opinion??![]()
Retard, quit projecting. I gave you two examples of how policies are set. Frankly, this should be common knowledge, but since you are member of the Dumbfuck Party I realize you don't possess such knowledge.
You have failed even to offer an opinion, other than that I am wrong. You have yet to explain how you think policy is set. I would ask you to enlighten us, but that's not likely so I will settle for entertain us, as I am sure it should be worth a few laughs.
Liar. Your actual quote was that they were "consistently in the positive for Bush"...
I asked for a link that proved that, you provided one that proved the opposite. Only in your delusional mind, as the explanations in the previous posts shows.
Wipe the cookies off your face before you lie like that. You have hope of people believing you if you do that. And yes, I condescend towards childlike insistence that they are "right" even in the face of your own evidence betraying you.
Originally Posted by Yurt
it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....
classic
Seriously, his "evidence" was a poll from Rasmussen that wasn't "in the positive" for Bush, another link that listed polls that didn't include Rasmussen, and a last link that was a blog dude giving his self-same opinion without evidence.
it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....
classic
You do realize your having a maudlin conversation with Yurtle, who can't sustain a rational discussion to save his life? Seriously, what's the point of that?
And stop lying.....the link I gave should a list of polls that gave the Shrub LOWER marks than the link to the Rasmussen site. And the last link was to a the same Pollster site, where a question was brought up to Rasmussens bias....the explanation by the guy who runs the site was a little more balanced than you liked....sorry the conclusion didn't go your way.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You do realize your having a maudlin conversation with Yurtle, who can't sustain a rational discussion to save his life? Seriously, what's the point of that?
And stop lying.....the link I gave should a list of polls that gave the Shrub LOWER marks than the link to the Rasmussen site. And the last link was to a the same Pollster site, where a question was brought up to Rasmussens bias....the explanation by the guy who runs the site was a little more balanced than you liked....sorry the conclusion didn't go your way.
:lol:
Taichiliberal
This message is hidden because Taichiliberal is on your ignore list.
![]()