Death is too good for this monster

it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....

classic
Seriously, his "evidence" was a poll from Rasmussen that wasn't "in the positive" for Bush, another link that listed polls that didn't include Rasmussen, and a last link that was a blog dude giving his self-same opinion without evidence.
 
You want me to show you where you are in error, when you've shown nothing but your own opinion?? :palm:

Retard, quit projecting. I gave you two examples of how policies are set. Frankly, this should be common knowledge, but since you are member of the Dumbfuck Party I realize you don't possess such knowledge.

You have failed even to offer an opinion, other than that I am wrong. You have yet to explain how you think policy is set. I would ask you to enlighten us, but that's not likely so I will settle for entertain us, as I am sure it should be worth a few laughs.
 
Retard, quit projecting. I gave you two examples of how policies are set. Frankly, this should be common knowledge, but since you are member of the Dumbfuck Party I realize you don't possess such knowledge.

You have failed even to offer an opinion, other than that I am wrong. You have yet to explain how you think policy is set. I would ask you to enlighten us, but that's not likely so I will settle for entertain us, as I am sure it should be worth a few laughs.



You showed examples that had nothing to do with the Maricopa County Sherriff's Office; but after having your little "rant-du-jour" you feel that I'm obligated to disprove your opinion. :palm:
Add in the fact that you are obviously unable to post without choosing to be insultive and it would seem that I'm the one that is receiving the amusement factor. :cof1:

But you go right ahead and FEEL that you're correct. :good4u:
 
Liar. Your actual quote was that they were "consistently in the positive for Bush"...

I asked for a link that proved that, you provided one that proved the opposite. Only in your delusional mind, as the explanations in the previous posts shows.

Wipe the cookies off your face before you lie like that. You have hope of people believing you if you do that. And yes, I condescend towards childlike insistence that they are "right" even in the face of your own evidence betraying you.


Are you really this fucking stupid or just insipidly stubborn to the point of pathological?

Here's the original line from post #60. Read it CAREFULLY! I'll underline the parts that should clarify my oft repeated point on this subject. (this is the second time you got a quote wrong).


Oh yeah, Ramusessen consistently polled in favor of the Shrub & company and every neocon mind fart AGAINST the average of every other valid American pollster group....no big surprise with this latest BS.

Seriously Damo, you need to check that ego of yours...because this is an anonymous forum. Being wrong here DOES NOT affect your personal life. Grow up, because you're sounding more and more like the neocon numbskulls from the AOL board that you yourself have denounced.
 
Originally Posted by Yurt
it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....

classic

Seriously, his "evidence" was a poll from Rasmussen that wasn't "in the positive" for Bush, another link that listed polls that didn't include Rasmussen, and a last link that was a blog dude giving his self-same opinion without evidence.

You do realize your having a maudlin conversation with Yurtle, who can't sustain a rational discussion to save his life? Seriously, what's the point of that?

And stop lying.....the link I gave should a list of polls that gave the Shrub LOWER marks than the link to the Rasmussen site. And the last link was to a the same Pollster site, where a question was brought up to Rasmussens bias....the explanation by the guy who runs the site was a little more balanced than you liked....sorry the conclusion didn't go your way.
 
it cracks me up how everytime touchyliberal loses a debate he starts calling someone a liar and makes stuff up....

classic

You do realize your having a maudlin conversation with Yurtle, who can't sustain a rational discussion to save his life? Seriously, what's the point of that?

And stop lying.....the link I gave should a list of polls that gave the Shrub LOWER marks than the link to the Rasmussen site. And the last link was to a the same Pollster site, where a question was brought up to Rasmussens bias....the explanation by the guy who runs the site was a little more balanced than you liked....sorry the conclusion didn't go your way.

:lol:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You do realize your having a maudlin conversation with Yurtle, who can't sustain a rational discussion to save his life? Seriously, what's the point of that?

And stop lying.....the link I gave should a list of polls that gave the Shrub LOWER marks than the link to the Rasmussen site. And the last link was to a the same Pollster site, where a question was brought up to Rasmussens bias....the explanation by the guy who runs the site was a little more balanced than you liked....sorry the conclusion didn't go your way.


Hey chuckles....what am I "making up" in my response to Damo? You're quick to make accusations, but when asked to back up what you say, you spew enough bullshit to fertilize the entire state of Hawaii.

Laugh clown, laugh.
 
Taichiliberal
This message is hidden because Taichiliberal is on your ignore list.
:mun:

Oh well folks, as you witnessed...I tried to have a rational discussion with this imbecile. Back into the dumpster he goes.

[ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=563824&postcount=108"]Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Death is too good for this monster[/ame]
 
Back
Top