Debate

That's why the Wall Street BIG bankers paid her all of that loot to explain to them how she was going to "go after them and reduce their power" right commie?

No, Goober.....that'll be Liz Warren's job.
punishment-slap-smiley-emoticon.gif



http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ime-To-Go-quot-Liz-Warren-quot-On-Wall-Street!!!!!
 

You posted all of Hillary's positions this week on various issues Mo, but she's well known to work both sides of the street and positions are not accomplishments. So commie, tell the class what Hillary's greatest accomplishment is, or maybe you could post just one of her accomplishments? :dunno: I'll understand if you can't and don't!:cof1:
 
COMMENTARY
No, Bill Clinton Didn’t Balance the Budget

By Stephen Moore
October 8, 1998

Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.

Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink.


rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-smiley-emoticon.gif



"The tax increase will…lead to a recession…and will actually increase the deficit."
- Rep. "Frig" Newton Gingrich (Republican, Georgia)



http://www.kellysite.net/taxes.html

*
http://archive.is/sx9KC


abbie_hoffman.jpg


*

Stephen Moore is an OBNOXIOUS ASSHOLE.....a real "Robo"!

 
You posted all of Hillary's positions this week on various issues Mo, but she's well known to work both sides of the street and positions are not accomplishments.

Quit worrying about Hillary, and......


GET YOUR BOY INTO REHAB, GOOBER!!!!!





crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
.
crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
.
crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
.
crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
.
crying-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
.
528.gif
 
Maybe there is still time, people love a rehab story, get him into rehab, he emerges 28 days later... just before the election and pulls it off!
 
COMMENTARY
No, Bill Clinton Didn’t Balance the Budget

By Stephen Moore
October 8, 1998
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.

Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.

And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?

Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.

More at http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/no-bill-clinton-didnt-balance-budget

cato is fucking partisan asshole





http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Omnibus+Budget+Reconciliation+Act+of+1993





Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

Legislation in the United States that raised taxes and cut some government spending in order to reduce the federal deficit. It cut spending on entitlement programs by $42 billion while creating higher tax brackets for some wealthy individuals and corporations. The Act came out of a theory that large deficits lead to inflation; this theory was rejected by both New Deal liberals and supply-side economics conservatives, both of whom believed that deficits are relatively unimportant. While the theory behind the Act remains controversial, it led to a projected budget surplus toward the end of the 1990s
 
rolling-on-the-floor-laughing-smiley-emoticon.gif






abbie_hoffman.jpg


*

Stephen Moore is an OBNOXIOUS ASSHOLE.....a real "Robo"!



Tags: Global Warming | climate change
Scientist Confesses: "Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam"



Short URL| Email Article| Comment| Contact| Print| A A




9
inShare
Imagine, for a moment, sitting at a prestigious steakhouse in Palm Beach, Florida, a hot spot for some of the most wealthy and famous — Donald Trump, Tiger Woods, Oprah Winfrey, James Patterson, Rush Limbaugh, and hundreds more.

And, imagine dining with a handful of men you’ve only read about. Some of them are worth millions, others published best-selling books, and some have held prominent positions at the White House.

In essence, you’re sitting at a five-person table of VIPs.

You’re about to take a bite of your New York strip when one of the men, a top U.S. intelligence agent, slams a 164-page document in the middle of the table.

This document, you soon find out, contains damning evidence that a network of politicians, corporations, and scientists have conspired together to promote the fear of “global warming” . . . despite evidence clearly stating no such “global warming” exists.

The motive: $22 billion per year.

To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic.



Read more: The Cold Truth Initiative
Important: Can you afford to Retire? http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/MKTNews/Global-Warming-climate-change/2014/11/17/id/607827/
 
cato is fucking partisan asshole





http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Omnibus+Budget+Reconciliation+Act+of+1993





Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

Legislation in the United States that raised taxes and cut some government spending in order to reduce the federal deficit. It cut spending on entitlement programs by $42 billion while creating higher tax brackets for some wealthy individuals and corporations. The Act came out of a theory that large deficits lead to inflation; this theory was rejected by both New Deal liberals and supply-side economics conservatives, both of whom believed that deficits are relatively unimportant. While the theory behind the Act remains controversial, it led to a projected budget surplus toward the end of the 1990s

The alleged Clinton budget surplus was fueled by the Dot Com boom, the dividend from the end of the cold war and a Republican Congress that controlled the purse strings and durg Slick Willy kicking and screaming into signing the "Work For Welfare" bill that CAME OUT OF THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS.
 
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993
CBO estimates that the Omnibus Budget Rec- onciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA-93) will reduce deficits in 1994 through 1998 by $433 billion
 
says a fucking racist piece of hated shit without an ounce of proof

The proof is in the pudding darlin, all you have to do is go look at what party controlled the Congress during Bill Clinton's administration and be smart enough to know and admit that CONGRESS CONTROLS THE PURSE STRINGS.
 
Tags: Global Warming | climate change
Scientist Confesses: "Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam"

"On December 18 and 22, 2014, Alana Marie Burke published a series of four articles that investigated the GWPP. They are titled:

Global Warming Petition Project: What Is It? What’s Its Purpose?
Global Warming Petition Project Is Fake, Climate Change Supporters Say
Global Warming Petition Project Fires Up Both Sides on Twitter
Global Warming Petition Project Is One of Many Climate Change Petitions Online

Each of Burke’s articles repeats the incorrect claim that the GWPP signers are all scientists, and each article has many examples of subtly misleading language. But each of her articles also points out that the GWPP has its critics.

Burke’s articles were the last ones published by Newsmax to mention the GWPP. But they weren’t the last articles published on Newsmax. That dubious honor belongs to three related “articles” written by former University of Florida chemist turned investment advisor, trader, and Newsmax editor Tom Luongo.

The problem with the articles is that none of them is an example of journalism – each is an example of “native advertising (aka “promoted posts” or “sponsored content”).

The headlines are written to imply that what follows is the result of investigative journalism: BannedWhite PaperProves Global Warming is a Dirty Scam,” “Scientist Confesses: “Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam,” and an alternative version of the second advertisement that is subtitled A Breaking Report from Newsmax Media (see image)

In this case, Luongo was selling discounted memberships to hisCold Truth Initiative,” and he even wanted to send you a copy of John Casey’s Dark Winter “(a $29 value)”, a book that supposedly exposes the grand climate conspiracy and predicts the end of the civilization for any nation that is unprepared. In fact, one of the promoted posts written by Luongo is nearly 7600 words long, 6000 of which are the usual half-truths, deceptions, misinformation, and logical fallacies used to deny the reality of industrial climate disruption. The last 1600 words are nothing more than a long winded advertisement."


istock_000005880712_small.jpg


lol_2012.jpg
 
The alleged Clinton budget surplus was fueled by the Dot Com boom, the dividend from the end of the cold war and a Republican Congress that controlled the purse strings and durg Slick Willy kicking and screaming into signing the "Work For Welfare" bill that CAME OUT OF THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS.


vcsPRAsset_1420413_113450_2a91473e-6376-4cad-8c4f-126c679fce1e_0.png

1996 - "Presidential advisor James Carville, the highly regarded Democratic political operative from Louisiana's bayou country, helped keep the 1992 Clinton campaign in focus and "on message" with a simple four-word phrase, "It's the economy, stupid."

If the White House is smart, this will not be its theme in 1996.

Though the White House and national media have been trumpeting the economy's "unexpectedly strong" (as The Washington Post put it) 2.8 percent first-quarter gain, this is modest growth by normal standards -- and voters remain uneasy.

Flash back four years: With the American economy just emerging from a two-year recession in the fall of 1992 and many Americans nervous about their economic prospects, Carville's one-note samba -- played over and over again throughout the campaign -- clearly helped propel Bill Clinton into the White House, forcing George Bush to retire to his beloved Texas.

Now it's Bill Clinton's turn to run for re-election. And though the economy is not moving backward (the definition of a recession), it's not setting any speed records either. Fifty percent of major U.S. companies trimmed their payrolls in the 12 months ending June 1995, some of them significantly. Indeed, from March 1995 to March 1996, 325,000 high-paying manufacturing jobs disappeared, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The public -- especially the nearly 8 million people who are working two or more jobs to make ends meet -- know something is amiss. And they are concerned.

The administration's initial response was a mix of denial and cheerleading: the silly claim that the economy is the healthiest it's been in 30 years. The White House has had the good sense to back off a bit from this claim."



 

About S&R
Think. It ain’t illegal yet. – George Clinton
Scholars & Rogues is a diverse band of thinkers, social analysts, artists, activists, grousers, jesters, and troublemakers. We’re all different in a variety of ways, but we share a general belief in progress, a conviction that smarter is better, and a passionate distaste for convention

Another leftist neo-commie blog with the credibility of Joseph Stalin.:rofl2:
 
val_kilmer2.jpg


"You're no daisy! You're no daisy at all. Poor soul, you were just too high strung."


September 27, 2016 - "Plunging the future of the 2016 Presidential debates into doubt, Donald J. Trump said on Tuesday morning that he would not participate in the remaining two debates if Hillary Clinton is there.

Trump blasted the format of Monday night’s debate by claiming that the presence of Clinton was “specifically designed” to distract him from delivering his message to the American people.

Every time I said something, she would say something back,” he said. It was rigged.”
346.gif


He also lambasted the “underhanded tactics” his opponent used during the debate. “She kept on bringing up things I said or did,” he added. “She is a very nasty person.”

Turning to CNN, Trump criticized the network’s use of a split screen showing both him and Clinton throughout the telecast. “It should have been just me,” he said. “That way people could have seen how really good my temperament is.”


 
The Clinton Record!! Bill Clinton = 23M JOBS!!

The Clinton Record!! Bill Clinton = 23M JOBS!!


The eight years of the Clinton Administration were divided into four Congresses, each lasting two years. The Democrats controlled the first one, and Republicans controlled the other three https://www.quora.com/What-politica...se-and-Senate-during-Bill-Clintons-presidency

Power of the Purse “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 7, clause 1

Congress—and in particular, the House of Representatives—is invested with the “power of the purse,” the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government. Massachusetts’ Elbridge Gerry said at the Federal Constitutional Convention that the House “was more immediately the representatives of the people, and it was a maxim that the people ought to hold the purse-strings.” http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Power-of-the-Purse/

THUS, EVERY HONEST PERSON WILL TELL YOU THAT THE CLINTON ECONOMY, WAS ACTUALLY THE GINGRICH ECONOMY, BECAUSE GINGRICH CONTROLLED THE PURSE.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top