DEI is still alive

Agreed. DEI hires saved the day when President Dazed and Confused was just standing there with a dumb look on his face.

abin29.jpg
I say this with complete seriousness, no snark. trump really does not look or act well. I think there's something we're not being told about his health. He looks like he's passed out in this picture.

1762619246300.png
 
Any examples specifically?



The sheer fact that there's so much denial about use of quotas, and discussion of alternatives to quotas argues strongly that quotas are indeed widely used in DEI hiring practices. Those using them know they have massive negative connotations attached and could even be illegal so they don't want it known or discussed that they are in fact using them.


Court cases like this one, smashing a company for use of quotas is another indicator of their pervasiveness in DEI


So, yes, there's plenty of solid evidence that quotas are common in DEI hiring practices. It's the easy way for an HR department to quantify their success in implementing DEI as quotas are measurable.
 
I'm bashing the system because it's inherently racist, sexist, and not "fair and equal." Hiring should be done on merit, and little else.
We don’t let you fucking racists define what racism is

That would be like letting child molesters define what child molestation is


Your unqualified in the subject of what is racism
 
Circular logic in your case.

Circular_Reasoning.jpg
Then tell me why it would be a good thing or bad thing to allow child molestors to be the ones to define what child molestation is

I don’t think it’s a good idea to consider those people qualified to help us define that term

They are disqualified from the discussion for obvious reasons
 
Racism is just as evil as child sex crimes

They destroy lives too

They even kill for their ideas


I don’t think racists should be included in a discussion of defining racism


It makes perfect sense to disqualify both groups from those respective discussions


You are disqualified
 
Then tell me why it would be a good thing or bad thing to allow child molestors to be the ones to define what child molestation is

I don’t think it’s a good idea to consider those people qualified to help us define that term

They are disqualified from the discussion for obvious reasons
previewimage-JbiTXs.jpg
 
Racism is just as evil as child sex crimes

They destroy lives too

They even kill for their ideas


I don’t think racists should be included in a discussion of defining racism


It makes perfect sense to disqualify both groups from those respective discussions


You are disqualified
is possible for there to be racism against whites or sexism against men?
 
Back
Top