Democrat Party sets several new records!

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

DIXIELAND, USA- A recently concluded study has found the Democrat Party has broken several long-standing records in the first half-term of Barrack Obama. The independent group, Dixie Center for Pinhead Understanding, finds the Democrats have averaged telling 87 lies per day in the 640 days Obama has been in office. The total, a whopping 55,680 lies is also a record for the most total lies of any administration for a full term, surpassing the previous record of 1,347, set by the administration of Andrew Johnson (1865-69). Both the average lies per day, and total lies, far surpass anything ever accomplished by an previous administration, and accompanies the record for most amount of deficit spending by any administration. The spending record is believed to be more than all previous administrations combined, including all war appropriations. However, it is the record number of lies which is most astounding, considering the campaign message of "draining the swamp" and "transparency" promised by several prominent Democrats, including the president.

An anonymous inside source reveals, this is part of a governing strategy, to literally bombard Americans with so many lies, they simply can't keep track of them all, and eventually give up trying. "We may get called out on a few now and again, but there is no way anyone could catch them all!" Using secret proprietary technologies, the DCPU was able to log every instance of a lie, from the president, the vice president, cabinet and administration members, as well as prominent Democrat leaders, Congressmen, and political pundits. It is doubtful we will ever see this volume of lying again in our lifetime, it is truly a historic event. Officials from the Guinness Book of World Records, and Ripley's Believe it or Not, have been notified. It is not known whether the Democrat Party will hold any kind of celebration of the achievement, most were unavailable for comment at the time of this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WAY TO GO PINHEADS!!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Dang, not a single response? Don't be so bashful! This is quite an honor for you-- And here at election time, when you have so little to be celebratory about. I thought a little gloating would be in order, but I guess you're all too modest?

 

[Bfgrn]

Got a link Dixie?

In the meantime...I DO have a link for this information. Bush and his administration lied 935 time, just about ONE subject; IRAQ.

False Pretenses

Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

January 23, 2008

President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.

On at least 532 separate occasions (in speeches, briefings, interviews, testimony, and the like), Bush and these three key officials, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to Al Qaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration's case for war.

It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda. This was the conclusion of numerous bipartisan government investigations, including those by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2004 and 2006), the 9/11 Commission, and the multinational Iraq Survey Group, whose "Duelfer Report" established that Saddam Hussein had terminated Iraq's nuclear program in 1991 and made little effort to restart it.

In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003. Not surprisingly, the officials with the most opportunities to make speeches, grant media interviews, and otherwise frame the public debate also made the most false statements, according to this first-ever analysis of the entire body of prewar rhetoric.

President Bush, for example, made 232 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and another 28 false statements about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Secretary of State Powell had the second-highest total in the two-year period, with 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Rumsfeld and Fleischer each made 109 false statements, followed by Wolfowitz (with 85), Rice (with 56), Cheney (with 48), and McClellan (with 14).

The massive database at the heart of this project juxtaposes what President Bush and these seven top officials were saying for public consumption against what was known, or should have been known, on a day-to-day basis. This fully searchable database includes the public statements, drawn from both primary sources (such as official transcripts) and secondary sources (chiefly major news organizations) over the two years beginning on September 11, 2001. It also interlaces relevant information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches, and interviews.

http://projects.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

A link? Oh I have a bunch of links, but I think I threw away all my Clinton links when he stopped being the president, and no longer mattered to anyone. You should clean out your bookmarks as well, it's really a waste of your hard drive space, and could cause your computer to lag. The Dixie Center for Pinhead Understanding doesn't have a formal website, they operate on limited funding as a non-profit 501(c), so no money to do a slick and impressive URL on the Internets. The DCPU is however, a bipartisan independent organization, much like NPR and CPB, except they don't receive public funding, only contributions from readers like you.

 

[evince]

maybe if you talked about a party that actually exsisted someone would answer.

 

[Bfgrn]

A link? Oh I have a bunch of links, but I think I threw away all my Clinton links when he stopped being the president, and no longer mattered to anyone. You should clean out your bookmarks as well, it's really a waste of your hard drive space, and could cause your computer to lag. The Dixie Center for Pinhead Understanding doesn't have a formal website, they operate on limited funding as a non-profit 501(c), so no money to do a slick and impressive URL on the Internets. The DCPU is however, a bipartisan independent organization, much like NPR and CPB, except they don't receive public funding, only contributions from readers like you.

A simple 'no, I made it up' will save cyberspace Dixie.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

maybe if you talked about a party that actually exsisted someone would answer.

Oh, but the Democrat Party does still exist, at least until November 2nd. You may not recognize them because they are mostly posing as Marxist Socialists, but they are the same old Democrat Party.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

A simple 'no, I made it up' will save cyberspace Dixie.

Ah, but I did not make this up, really! Didn't you read? The DCPU is an independent organization, dedicated to the better understanding of pinheads worldwide. They did a highly sophisticated study with actual statistics and everything, and you read this in my original post, why are you skeptical? They even cited anonymous sources, and we all know those are the best kind, because they have no reason to hold back!

I can't believe your Democrat Party has won such a high and prestigious honor, and you think I made it all up. I know it's hard to believe Democrats were successful at something, considering everything else they've failed at, but you shouldn't be so eager to disbelieve this monumental accomplishment.