Democrat Rep. Delia Ramirez Says Her Family is in US Illegally

There is no treason here. Something criminal yes but to call for her to be hung is wrong and uncalled for. Is that what you want? We start killing everyone who doesn't have their papers? Very Hitler esque of you.
As I said, you can have a different opinion of whether the person committed a crime, but you cannot, when someone calls for a trial and a penalty after the trial, pretend that it is the same thing as a call to violence. It just isn't.

Hitler-esque would be me trampling all over someone's First Amendment rights for saying something that hurt your feels simply because you want them to be punished without cause.
 
As I said, you can have a different opinion of whether the person committed a crime, but you cannot, when someone calls for a trial and a penalty after the trial, pretend that it is the same thing as a call to violence. It just isn't.

Hitler-esque would be me trampling all over someone's First Amendment rights for saying something that hurt your feels simply because you want them to be punished without cause.
Oh they can say it, but they are not free from the consequences of saying it. You cannot call for someone to be hanged online.
 
Never claimed it was.

Why is she representing the USA when she's putting other countries ahead of it?
I'm trying to find out what the crime is here that she should be hanged for, according to the OP.
 
Oh they can say it, but they are not free from the consequences of saying it. You cannot call for someone to be hanged online.
You keep pretending that they called for something other than a trial and a penalty. Regardless, yes... you can call for someone to face the penalty for a crime for which they have had a fair trial and been convicted. Even if the penalty is death.

You've taken this onto a journey into inanity. No matter how many times you say it, repeating it doesn't make it any different. The constitution lists one crime (Treason) and one penalty for that crime (Death). Calling for a trial and then for the penalty to be paid after a conviction is never a call to violence. If you contact the FBI, any person looking at the post will very quickly just be annoyed at you for wasting their time.
 
You keep pretending that they called for something other than a trial and a penalty. Regardless, yes... you can call for someone to face the penalty for a crime for which they have had a fair trial and been convicted. Even if the penalty is death.

You've taken this onto a journey into inanity. No matter how many times you say it, repeating it doesn't make it any different. The constitution lists one crime (Treason) and one penalty for that crime (Death). Calling for a trial and then for the penalty to be paid after a conviction is never a call to violence. If you contact the FBI, any person looking at the post will very quickly just be annoyed at you for wasting their time.
What crime was committed? None. So therefore, he said for her to be hanged. Again not allowed. You can try to explain it away all you want.
 
What crime did she commit and she should be hanged for?
The OP claimed treason. I disagree with any treason occurring, but I support the OP's right to state what crime he believes was committed as well as what the prescribed punishment for said crime happens to be.
 
What crime was committed? None. So therefore, he said for her to be hanged. Again not allowed. You can try to explain it away all you want.
He told you what crime he thinks she should be tried for, it happens to be the one crime listed in the constitution, hence my noting that it is literally the only crime given by name in the constitution, and it gives you the penalty... Do you want to guess the penalty?... *hint* I've mentioned it before in this thread and it rhymes with something you likely have intimate knowledge of... bad breath...
 
I am guessing magats would have no problem with someone claiming trump has "committed treason and thus should be hanged"
 
Back
Top