I guess it must be nice going through life never knowing anything. Blissful, right Yurt?

I guess it must be nice going through life never knowing anything. Blissful, right Yurt?
That isn't the democrats standard I've seen on JPP. It isnt what they have done or are doing, it is what they MIGHT do.
Do you disagree with them?
Democratic rhetoric inciting violence and more dangerous than Hitler
Yelling at people in restaurants, kicking out peaceful diners, at least one Democrat congressman encouraging HARASSMENT.
Democratic rhetoric is more dangerous than Hitler or Stalin, and quite possibly democrats are the most dangerous people in history.
Disagree with what?
So you support limiting speech because of what some vaguely alluded to poster on jpp might do?
Nevermind, should have realized there is no point in responding to a troll.
looks like a whitey c peckerwood shitting in the pants thread as everyone is out to get them, a result of them realizing it's all over for them
Worse because of all the shouting and what they MIGHT do vs what was ACTUALLY done to millions of Jews.
Yaya, you are officially a complete fucking idiot.
1. Do you disagree with this:
That isn't the democrats standard I've seen on JPP. It isnt what they have done or are doing, it is what they MIGHT do.
2. No
3. Nice cop out to whatever you whined about.
Clinton is white.
President Obama is Black. He doesn't have a dangerous bone in is body.
It's racist cowards like you that always try to find false equivalencies.
So then stfu, snowflake. We have a right to challenge or even insult our government officials and their actions.
There is nothing in your statement (or head) which anyone might agree or disagree with, troll. Your face, though...
Of course Obama doesn't have a dangerous bone in his body; unless you know recent history.
Obama won the peace prize on what he might do
Trump is demonized worse than Hitler and Stalin on what he might do
That is the logic of democrats
Still can't answer the question.
Run away democrat.
There was no clear question, dumb dumb. First you asked "Do you agree with them" w/o specifying who them referred to what it was I might agree with them on. When I responded that your question you repeated your statement not a question and did failed to make your question.
Do I disagree about what? Ffs, troll, try to be coherent..... Must be the pills.
1. Do you disagree with this:
That isn't the democrats standard I've seen on JPP. It isnt what they have done or are doing, it is what they MIGHT do.
2. No
3. Nice cop out to whatever you whined about.
Bush did start signature strikes -but Obama ( at Brennan's urging) took it to the level that according to the CIA itselfTTQ64 must have simply forgotten about Obama taking us from two to seven wars and signature assassination drone strikes.
Bush did start signature strikes -but Obama ( at Brennan's urging) took it to the level that according to the CIA itself
at least 25% of the time we didn't know whom we were droning
got a reference? that's new to me. But i've seen enough to make us all sick.The Pentagon says that they were only 2% successful in striking legitimate targets.
If you could follow the thread you would know who I referred to, in fact you quoted the post. But you're just not smart enough to catch on.
Good luck in your ignorance..... May it be blise
I refuse to make a Hilter comparison lol.
It’s beyond tired—and absurd. But I agree that some of the over the top rhetoric is potentially dangerous. We already had one incident at the congressional softball game.
Which went straight down the memory hole, btw.