Democrats are playing a losing hand but don't know it

[Truth Detector]

Don’t have, does take a lot to expose photo ops, Trump being Trump will do it himself, the drama itself will hit a point of marginal utility, the scare the Market put into him in one day over his tariff idiocy is a perfect example

More grammatically incorrect word salad. Put down the crack pipe clown.

 

[Truth Detector]

Created by EO sixty plus years ago but it is authorized and funded by Congress, Congress controls the spending, not the Executive Branch, and definitely questionable if the President can eliminate it without the consent of Congress seeing it comes under their Foreign Assistance Act

And yet, it is not an act of law by the legislation, but rather, created by Executive Order. Which means it can be reversed in a like manner.

And impoundment only allows the President to delay spending, not eliminate, and he is suppose to get Congresses permission within a reasonable amount of time

Who controls the House and Senate dipshit?

You got to turn the channel every know and then

Projection from the MSNBC mentally unstable parrot.

 

[Diogenes]

USAID was created by an E.O. issued by President John F. Kennedy (E.O. 10973). It can be unraveled by EO.

He also covered his ass with the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

USAID, or the United States Agency for International Development, was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1961. Here's a brief overview of how it came into being:

1. Historical Context: During the Cold War, the U.S. was engaged in a global competition with the Soviet Union for influence in developing countries. This competition necessitated a more organized approach to foreign aid to counter Soviet influence and promote American values like democracy and free markets.
2. Legislation: The creation of USAID was formalized through the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, which was signed into law by President Kennedy. This act restructured U.S. foreign aid programs and established USAID as an independent federal agency within the executive branch.

@Grok

 

[Diogenes]

More grammatically incorrect word salad. Put down the crack pipe clown.

Day drinking, or dementia?

Poor Anchovies.

 

[archives]

And yet, it is not an act of law by the legislation, but rather, created by Executive Order. Which means it can be reversed in a like manner.



Who controls the House and Senate dipshit?


Projection from the MSNBC mentally unstable parrot.

Wrong, once again, created by EO but authorized and funded by Congress, to suspend spending or do away with the Dept Trump has to have Congresses permission

Why do I have to keep educating these MAGA’s on civics

 

[Kurmugeon]

Democrats played the losing hand of Biden, DEI, Open Borders, Zelensky, and the Toxic EVS from the Green New Deal.


Five bad cards, that only make each other worse.


And now that Trump2 is in office, they have nothing new to offer... So they double down on the losing hand.


It like being shot in the gut! Its not getting better.

-

 

[BartenderElite]

If they held the election today, Trump would lose.

Republicans have already gone hard right. They're making the mid-terms easy for Dems.

 

[Kurmugeon]

I watched the recent DNC selection meeting.

Since there are 57 genders, and each needs at least three representatives, that means rule by a concise, unified, focused, steady, and definitive council of 171 members...

It will be much more organized than a herd of tasered cats!

I am sure we can expect great leadership from the Democrats.

-

 

[gfm7175]

Source is missing, but if I had to guess, copied and pasted off of a Gateway opinion piece, or definitely would be AM talk radio pimp if he has a podcast

USAID is funded by Congress, and isn’t up to the Executive Branch to dictate how that approved funding is spent, Congress has already done that, but as we’ve seen, Trump, and the GOP, doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the Constitution

And Democrats don’t have to do anything about tariffs except continue to remind Americans that Trump promised on Day 1 he was bringing costs down

Poor anchovies......... doesn't understand civics..........

 

[gfm7175]

You might learn something. Or maybe not

Since this is anchovies you're talking about, I'm going "all-in" on NOT.

 

[countryboy]

Playing a losing hand? Elon got everybody's personal information. Trump has started a trade war with China and will soon back away, CAUSE THERE'S NOTHING WE GOT CHINA WANTS OR CAN'T DUPLICATE, BUT WE NEED EVERYTHING THEY GOT, our air waves are not safe, both houses are powerless over this POS and we're losing? Trump may not be our fault, BUT DONNY DUMB AS FUCK IS EVERYBODY'S FUCKIN PROBLEM

Retard alert.

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

Source is missing, but if I had to guess, copied and pasted off of a Gateway opinion piece, or definitely would be AM talk radio pimp if he has a podcast

USAID is funded by Congress, and isn’t up to the Executive Branch to dictate how that approved funding is spent, Congress has already done that, but as we’ve seen, Trump, and the GOP, doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the Constitution

And Democrats don’t have to do anything about tariffs except continue to remind Americans that Trump promised on Day 1 he was bringing costs down

Kennedy formed it with exec order and Trump can dissolve the motherfucker just as quickly. Personally the more I learn the more I think that's the right answer. It can't be reformed.

 

[gfm7175]

Created by EO sixty plus years ago but it is authorized and funded by Congress, Congress controls the spending, not the Executive Branch, and definitely questionable if the President can eliminate it without the consent of Congress seeing it comes under their Foreign Assistance Act

And impoundment only allows the President to delay spending, not eliminate, and he is suppose to get Congresses permission within a reasonable amount of time

You got to turn the channel every know and then

Poor anchovies..............

 

[gfm7175]

Wrong, once again, created by EO but authorized and funded by Congress, to suspend spending or do away with the Dept Trump has to have Congresses permission

Why do I have to keep educating these MAGA’s on civics

Poor anchovies........... still failing at civics.............

 

[Diogenes]

Poor anchovies........... still failing at civics.............

Poor Anchovies.

 

[Kurmugeon]

The Dems thought they had a winning hand once, but it turned out to just be Identity Politics... and the white-guilt had dried up.

-

 

[Lionfish]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1886572458460774534

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1886572458460774534

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The more they "respond" the more people Trump identifies to fire.

He's not fucking around this time

I hope you don't plan on getting a tax refund this year because they aren't going to happen as Trump tanks the government.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Do you think a Republican Congress is going to say no to him on spending? I don't think so.

Again, he can eliminate USAID with the stroke of a pen and nothing Congress can do about it.

But you keep screaming into the heavens. Maybe Schumer can give you another guacamole lesson

No. He can't eliminate it with the stroke of a pen. It was made a government department in 1998 when a law was passed.

§6563. Status of AID​

(a) In general​

Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5.

 

[archives]

Poor anchovies........... still failing at civics.............

So explain to us how created by EO but authorized and funded by Congress, to suspend spending or do away with the Dept Trump has to have Congresses’ permission