Democrats are finally abandoning their phony class warfare propaganda about those who single-handedly shoulder almost the entire federal income tax burden in this country by themselves "not paying their fair share" and are now advocating for them to receive a sweeping tax break.
Democrats say wealthier Americans deserve a state and local tax break:
That is not true, the state and local taxes are "worth just dollars to the average middle-class taxpayer," if you are deducting, as probably anyone with a middle class income would do, the state and local taxes were important. Sure the higher level incomes paid more, but that doesn't discount the effects on the middle class taxpayer, "just dollars" is a relevant term totally depending on your tax burden
The Democrats aren't pushing this change because they have altered their view on tax, but rather because it is an issue for all taxpayers in a lot of States they represent, that, and the fact that already the blue states pay more and get less with Federal tax, and this only increases that imbalance
LMAO
Someone needs an introductory economics and/or history course.
Presidents Who Cut Taxes Consistently Produced Increased Revenues, and Vice Versa
^Another low IQ dumbfuck who doesn't have the slightest clue of what they are bloviating about.
I’m a liberal and that is not what I stand for, I think you generalize.
Nobody said liberals say they stand for Democrat power, just that every time that one defining principle (the only thing they are ever consistent on) is threatened, everything else gets thrown under the bus.
Noticed you didn't offer anything proving me incorrect
Next
Democrats are finally abandoning their phony class warfare propaganda about those who single-handedly shoulder almost the entire federal income tax burden in this country by themselves "not paying their fair share" and are now advocating for them to receive a sweeping tax break.
Democrats say wealthier Americans deserve a state and local tax break:
So the question is, did liberals finally start comprehending human nature, learning from history, and/or comprehending first-year economics concepts (like robbing job-creators blind just kills jobs) [i.e., did they stop being liberals]...or did they just finally come to terms with the fact, contrary to everything they've told us, that it is Democrats whose base is a tiny handful of rich extremists?
How do you prove stupid? This is stupid: "worth just dollars to the average middle-class taxpayer," That's not facts, it's just stupid and makes ZERO sense.
This is stupid: "just dollars" 'is a relevant term totally depending on your tax burden' That's not facts, it's just stupid and makes ZERO sense.
This is stupid: "and the fact that already the blue states pay more and get less with Federal tax, and this only increases that imbalance" That's not facts, it's just stupid and makes ZERO sense.
You're conflating two issues. (1) what should the overall tax distribution be as between the rich and everyone else, (2) to what extent should people be double-taxed on their incomes. The Republicans, who spent years whining about "double taxation" when the issue was whether heirs should pay taxes on unearned income despite some of that income already having been taxed when earned by the deceased, suddenly decided "double taxation" was fine if it was a way of sticking it to people in states with higher tax rates, in order to try to force those states to lower taxes.
Basically, the new rule isn't about shifting more tax burden to the rich, generally, but rather about shifting more tax burden to higher earners in particular states.