Democrats’ flip in California concludes final unresolved US House race

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

If all three seats are vacant at once, a 217-215 majority would mean that Republicans couldn’t afford to lose a single member on a party-line vote.

 
Guno צְבִי said:
The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

If all three seats are vacant at once, a 217-215 majority would mean that Republicans couldn’t afford to lose a single member on a party-line vote.

Click to expand...
Guano, it also means that the democrats cannot win anything without the help of a few republicans. Details matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
It's really weird that only in California, and only since that state started doing all-mail-in ballot elections, that Republican wins in Congressional races are regularly overturned / reversed after weeks of post-election day ballot counting where the Democrat that initially lost gets like 70 to 80% of the "late" votes and then suddenly wins by a narrow margin.

:unsure:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It's really weird that only in California, and only since that state started doing all-mail-in ballot elections, that Republican wins in Congressional races are regularly overturned / reversed after weeks of post-election day ballot counting where the Democrat that initially lost gets like 70 to 80% of the "late" votes and then suddenly wins by a narrow margin.

:unsure:
Click to expand...

Is it? Is it really weird?
 
TOP said:
You don't think it unusual?
Click to expand...

I don't even think it's factual.

Quite a few races had extended vote counts. If you look at the results of those - they're pretty much equal. Some went Dem, some went GOP.

And guess what? That's how it has been in every election in modern times.
 
BartenderElite said:
I don't even think it's factual.

Quite a few races had extended vote counts. If you look at the results of those - they're pretty much equal. Some went Dem, some went GOP.

And guess what? That's how it has been in every election in modern times.
Click to expand...
How many almost a month?
 
Guno צְבִי said:
The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

If all three seats are vacant at once, a 217-215 majority would mean that Republicans couldn’t afford to lose a single member on a party-line vote.

Click to expand...
Gatz already said he is abandoning his seat.
 
BartenderElite said:
Not many, But quite a few took more than a week & even 2+ weeks.

If you want to cry & scream fraud on this one race because it went Dem - find something to back that up other than "took so long to count."
Click to expand...
I'm not crying or screaming ....am I? I asked it was unusual.... And it is...
 
BartenderElite said:
Is it? Is it really weird?
Click to expand...
Yes. During the election, the vote was say, 50.5 to 49.5 in favor of the Republican. Then after the polls close, late mail-in ballots are still coming in for several weeks and get counted. In that count, 70+% of the votes are for the Democrat and the Democrat wins by a narrow margin. That smells of two-week old rotten fish.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes. During the election, the vote was say, 50.5 to 49.5 in favor of the Republican. Then after the polls close, late mail-in ballots are still coming in for several weeks and get counted. In that count, 70+% of the votes are for the Democrat and the Democrat wins by a narrow margin. That smells of two-week old rotten fish.
Click to expand...

Oh, stop your belly aching.

It is only vote-fraud if the evil, White-Supremacist Republican wins!

-
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes. During the election, the vote was say, 50.5 to 49.5 in favor of the Republican. Then after the polls close, late mail-in ballots are still coming in for several weeks and get counted. In that count, 70+% of the votes are for the Democrat and the Democrat wins by a narrow margin. That smells of two-week old rotten fish.
Click to expand...

No, it doesn't, if you understand vote counts at any level.

You ignore it every time I counter that point - so, basically, you just WANT to believe something is fishy. But anyone who follows vote tallies throughout the elections knows this is not unusual, as they often count mail-in or larger municipalities last. And that isn't even always the case - as already stated on this thread, some areas where they took over a week to count went GOP.

If you're going to insinuate fraud - a serious accusation - you need to come up w/ something better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top