Democrats’ flip in California concludes final unresolved US House race

archives said:
No, happened in New York also, Democrats flipped seats, and opposite occurred in Pennsylvania, not unusual, and certainly not conspiratorial
Click to expand...
After nearly a month of counting votes? Were all the seats that were flipped after after an "extended" period of vote counting?
 
TOP said:
No... why?
Click to expand...

Because there have been extended, weeks-long counts in every election in modern times - in both Dem & Republican areas, and with results that went both ways.

I mean, look at Maricopa County. Until very recently, that was a Republican stronghold - and they have always taken extended periods of time to count votes.
 
BartenderElite said:
No, it doesn't, if you understand vote counts at any level.

You ignore it every time I counter that point - so, basically, you just WANT to believe something is fishy. But anyone who follows vote tallies throughout the elections knows this is not unusual, as they often count mail-in or larger municipalities last. And that isn't even always the case - as already stated on this thread, some areas where they took over a week to count went GOP.

If you're going to insinuate fraud - a serious accusation - you need to come up w/ something better.
Click to expand...
I know that if say there are 100,000 votes counted by election day and that 50500 of them are for the Republican and 49500 of them are for the Democrat running for an office, then an say additional 3000 votes come in by mail in the say three weeks after the election is over and are counted and the vote count in those 3000 are 2100 for the Democrat and 900 are for the Republican, something's not right there especially when that happens in multiple, separate, elections in various areas of the state over a period of years.

It's like you are flipping a coin and the results are very close to 50 - 50 and then you switch coins and suddenly the results are 70 - 30.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I know that if say there are 100,000 votes counted by election day and that 51500 of them are for the Republican and 48500 of them are for the Democrat running for an office, then an say additional 3000 votes come in by mail in the say three weeks after the election is over and are counted and the vote count in those 3000 are 2100 for the Democrat and 900 are for the Republican, something's not right there especially when that happens in multiple, separate, elections in various areas of the state over a period of years.

It's like you are flipping a coin and the results are very close to 50 - 50 and then you switch coins and suddenly the results are 70 - 30.
Click to expand...

That narrative doesn't really exist.

I brought this up w/ you the last time, and you ignored it. In PA in 2020 - I knew Biden was going to win that state on election night. They reported where the remaining votes were, and in some of the areas, it had already broken 70-30 for Biden - even close to 80-20 in some spots. It was very easy to see that, and extrapolate what the overall vote count would look like once the votes from those areas were added to the overall total.

It's some kind of imaginary world you're describing where things go 51-49 all night, from every single area, and the area where votes are coming from makes absolutely no difference. It's fantasy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I know that if say there are 100,000 votes counted by election day and that 50500 of them are for the Republican and 49500 of them are for the Democrat running for an office, then an say additional 3000 votes come in by mail in the say three weeks after the election is over and are counted and the vote count in those 3000 are 2100 for the Democrat and 900 are for the Republican, something's not right there especially when that happens in multiple, separate, elections in various areas of the state over a period of years.

It's like you are flipping a coin and the results are very close to 50 - 50 and then you switch coins and suddenly the results are 70 - 30.
Click to expand...
Even the scripts are regurgitated
 
Kurmugeon said:
Oh, stop your belly aching.

It is only vote-fraud if the evil, White-Supremacist Republican wins!

-
Click to expand...
The first time it happened was in 2016 in Orange County and vicinity. This is a heavily Republican part of California. 4 out of 5 House races were decided initially in favor of Republicans, then in the aftermath and weeks of post-election day ballot counting, 3 out 4 Republicans lost their seats in very close outcomes where the post election day mail-in ballots overwhelmingly came in for Democrats.

How in an area with a serious Republican majority can Democrats get like 70 -80% of the vote?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The first time it happened was in 2016 in Orange County and vicinity. This is a heavily Republican part of California. 4 out of 5 House races were decided initially in favor of Republicans, then in the aftermath and weeks of post-election day ballot counting, 3 out 4 Republicans lost their seats in very close outcomes where the post election day mail-in ballots overwhelmingly came in for Democrats.

How in an area with a serious Republican majority can Democrats get like 70 -80% of the vote?
Click to expand...

How DARE you bring rational arguments to an emotional subject!

There is zero Voter-Fraud! Nada! None! The very concept is ... is.... is... Inconceivable!

-
 
Kurmugeon said:
How DARE you bring rational arguments to an emotional subject!

There is zero Voter-Fraud! Nada! None! The very concept is ... is.... is... Inconceivable!

-
Click to expand...

That actually isn't true. There IS some fraud in every election. The government keeps a website tracking it. It's all individual stuff, and statistically amounts to zero.

Massive fraud? Coordinated fraud? That just came about because Trump is a narcissist who can't stand losing. He said in '16 also, just because he lost the popular vote. I still can't understand why anyone believes him.

But he has changed the culture for MAGA, for sure. Anytime a Republican loses now, it's all we hear. It was stolen!
 
BartenderElite said:
That actually isn't true. There IS some fraud in every election. The government keeps a website tracking it. It's all individual stuff, and statistically amounts to zero.

Massive fraud? Coordinated fraud? That just came about because Trump is a narcissist who can't stand losing. He said in '16 also, just because he lost the popular vote. I still can't understand why anyone believes him.

But he has changed the culture for MAGA, for sure. Anytime a Republican loses now, it's all we hear. It was stolen!
Click to expand...

Bull shit!

-
 
Guno צְבִי said:
The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

The contest was the last unresolved House race in the country, and with Gray’s victory, Republicans won 220 seats to Democrats’ 215. Overall, Democrats gained one seat from their pre-election total.

If all three seats are vacant at once, a 217-215 majority would mean that Republicans couldn’t afford to lose a single member on a party-line vote.

Click to expand...
Translation: Republicans own the house, Senate and Presidency. To sum it up.....Democrats lost it all. Guno you fake Jew and Vet. Your lying ass will not even be able to get a job at McDonalds. Thankfully
 
BartenderElite said:
Because there have been extended, weeks-long counts in every election in modern times - in both Dem & Republican areas, and with results that went both ways.

I mean, look at Maricopa County. Until very recently, that was a Republican stronghold - and they have always taken extended periods of time to count votes.
Click to expand...
Ok...I think this was unusual...perhaps I'm wrong...
I don't see how the universal voting by mail "improves" our election system...it's not very impressive, after all, if it takes a month to count votes...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top