Democrats Happy To Keep Kamala Low Keyed

Rightys are so insane. She was picked as Dem candidate 2 weeks ago. She had to build an organization for running from scratch. That is a big job. She had to get money raised and commercials airing. Then she had to go through the process of picking a VP from a dozen good candidates.
The Dem convention starts next week and she has to prepare for that.
She should have skipped all that and given interviews on Fox and Infowars all day , every day.
 
Nordberg said:
There you goofball rightys go again. You have no idea what she has planned or why. She has been very busy with the candidacy dropped on her so late in the election season. So you make up ridiculous lies and the chorus of idiots sings the same song.
Trump is factually stupid. He has to embarrass you. You guys do claim to be able to judge intelligence. He is a shining example of a person on a downslide from low intelligence to super low.
You have NOTHING from Kamala to judge her intelligence on, but when has that ever stopped you guys?
She has done several rallies and did not prattle like Daffy Donald.
Click to expand...
Do YOU have any idea what she has planned or why? Seems to me she's being very tight lipped about any substance to her campaign and about what she'd do in office. The MSM is trying hard to scrub her past statements and record of political policy at the same time. Why is that?

And, you're right, we have NOTHING from Kamel Toe to judge her intelligence on, since she's never demonstrated any.

She does fluff rallies where she smiles and waves, spouts some platitudes read off a teleprompter, and leaves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
T. A. Gardner said:
Do YOU have any idea what she has planned or why? Seems to me she's being very tight lipped about any substance to her campaign and about what she'd do in office. The MSM is trying hard to scrub her past statements and record of political policy at the same time. Why is that?

And, you're right, we have NOTHING from Kamel Toe to judge her intelligence on, since she's never demonstrated any.

She does fluff rallies where she smiles and waves, spouts some platitudes read off a teleprompter, and leaves.
Click to expand...
It seems to you. That is where you went awry. She was a DA. She was a prosecutor. She was a Senator. She graduated aw school and passed the bar. You are crazy.
 
Nordberg said:
It seems to you. That is where you went awry. She was a DA. She was a prosecutor. She was a Senator. She graduated aw school and passed the bar. You are crazy.
Click to expand...
So, your answer to my question is to give me a list of irrelevant appeals to authority fallacies. You got nothing.

As for going to law school and passing the bar, I see that standard as the end game in a limbo dance. That's a pretty low bar to be using.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So, your answer to my question is to give me a list of irrelevant appeals to authority fallacies. You got nothing.

As for going to law school and passing the bar, I see that standard as the end game in a limbo dance. That's a pretty low bar to be using.
Click to expand...
If she is such a skilled sharo ad a tack speaker why won't they let her talk?
 
TOP said:
If she is such a skilled sharo ad a tack speaker why won't they let her talk?
Click to expand...
Because she's an idiot and they know it. Off teleprompter she's all moron and word salad. Her handlers also know damn well they can't let her tell the truth about what she'll do in office because nobody would vote for her if she did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
T. A. Gardner said:
Because she's an idiot and they know it. Off teleprompter she's all moron and word salad. Her handlers also know damn well they can't let her tell the truth about what she'll do in office because nobody would vote for her if she did.
Click to expand...
Everybody knows it... How could anyone even consider possibly voting for her?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So, your answer to my question is to give me a list of irrelevant appeals to authority fallacies. You got nothing.

As for going to law school and passing the bar, I see that standard as the end game in a limbo dance. That's a pretty low bar to be using.
Click to expand...
That is because you have no idea what law school demands. Or think you are not telling the truth because backing Trump is your job. I gave you solid facts. Those are important jobs that require education and talent. I am sure you know that, but you have to weasel out of the truth. Your function is to refute every single thing that makes her more qualified than a corrupt Daffy Donald. You have nothing to dispute her qualifications.
 
Nordberg said:
That is because you have no idea what law school demands. Or think you are not telling the truth because backing Trump is your job. I gave you solid facts. Those are important jobs that require education and talent. I am sure you know that, but you have to weasel out of the truth. Your function is to refute every single thing that makes her more qualified than a corrupt Daffy Donald. You have nothing to dispute her qualifications.
Click to expand...
Being a liar... err, lawyer is not a particularly high standard for office. In fact, I see it as a negative for ANY person wanting to hold public office. Being a lawyer is irrelevant to being a good politician.

As for being a prosecutor and DA, those are qualifications to specialized office. They are IRRELEVANT to holding a general political office like being a member of Congress or President.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Being a liar... err, lawyer is not a particularly high standard for office. In fact, I see it as a negative for ANY person wanting to hold public office. Being a lawyer is irrelevant to being a good politician.

As for being a prosecutor and DA, those are qualifications to specialized office. They are IRRELEVANT to holding a general political office like being a member of Congress or President.
Click to expand...
They show intelligence and the ability to learn. A senator is not a political office to you? Over 50 percent of Senators are lawyers. Over 30 percent of the house is. You are as usual , playing opposites.
 
Nordberg said:
They show intelligence and the ability to learn. A senator is not a political office to you? Over 50 percent of Senators are lawyers. Over 30 percent of the house is. You are as usual , playing opposites.
Click to expand...
No, they show that they can get good grades on some of the simplest Batchelor's degree programs there are like political science and then go to law school and pass.

Appeal to popularity ("over 30 percent of the house is") doesn't mean squat. Most people in the US think Congress is stupid.

www.pewresearch.org

6. Evaluations of members of Congress and the biggest problem with elected officials today

Americans express highly negative views of elected officials – and have grown increasingly pessimistic about their congressional representatives over the
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org


www.ft.com

Profiles in Ignorance — are America’s politicians getting dumber?

In his illuminating and hilarious book, Andy Borowitz not only skewers political stupidity, he identifies its three key phases
www.ft.com www.ft.com

And, it's nothing new.

R.48fc4adfac221140ec2b9183bea9bb58


Maybe we should outlaw lawyers being able to be elected to political office. The replacements couldn't do any worse than the lawyers have...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, they show that they can get good grades on some of the simplest Batchelor's degree programs there are like political science and then go to law school and pass.

Appeal to popularity ("over 30 percent of the house is") doesn't mean squat. Most people in the US think Congress is stupid.

www.pewresearch.org

6. Evaluations of members of Congress and the biggest problem with elected officials today

Americans express highly negative views of elected officials – and have grown increasingly pessimistic about their congressional representatives over the
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org


www.ft.com

Profiles in Ignorance — are America’s politicians getting dumber?

In his illuminating and hilarious book, Andy Borowitz not only skewers political stupidity, he identifies its three key phases
www.ft.com www.ft.com

And, it's nothing new.

R.48fc4adfac221140ec2b9183bea9bb58


Maybe we should outlaw lawyers being able to be elected to political office. The replacements couldn't do any worse than the lawyers have...
Click to expand...
You are proof that they are adept at their jobs.
 
Nordberg said:
Rightys are so insane. She was picked as Dem candidate 2 weeks ago. She had to build an organization for running from scratch. That is a big job. She had to get money raised and commercials airing. Then she had to go through the process of picking a VP from a dozen good candidates.
The Dem convention starts next week and she has to prepare for that.
She should have skipped all that and given interviews on Fox and Infowars all day , every day.
Click to expand...
It's funny to see all these excuses. Why not just say what it is? It's a strategic decision by her campaign not to do it (and one can make a very strong case that it's a smart decision). If they felt she needed to do more interviews, she would be doing them.

People here take everything so personally and can't see the big picture in how these folks operate.
 
cawacko said:
It's funny to see all these excuses. Why not just say what it is? It's a strategic decision by her campaign not to do it (and one can make a very strong case that it's a smart decision). If they felt she needed to do more interviews, she would be doing them.

People here take everything so personally and can't see the big picture in how these folks operate.
Click to expand...
She will be doing them. The Trumpys act like they are some big deal. Every politician hits the news shows. She will do them too.
 
Nordberg said:
She will be doing them. The Trumpys act like they are some big deal. Every politician hits the news shows. She will do them too.
Click to expand...
They want her to do interviews for the same reason her team doesn’t want to do them.

You can only see through your pro Dem/pro Harris goggles. The reason even non Trumpy’s might is because as Americans we want to see her answer tough questions. It’s a rite of passage for every candidate but due to the circumstances she’s running for President not having to do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top