democrats have lied about mass shooters and shootings

The true believers who refuse to accept that gun violence is an integral part of American culture are the truly disingenuous here.

The right to bear arms is a basic human right in America, even if this is the only place on the planet where this is true.

The framers gave the rural states more political power than their percentage of the population justifies.

In a polarized nation, amendments are impossible; this will be the fact of life for however long this republic manages to survive.

The citizens of rural states have made it perfectly clear that slaughtered children are a reasonable price to pay for the right to own assault weaponry.

All of this is self evident.

One would have to be completely incoherent to not recognize this.

The price of keeping our republic in it present configuration is bullet riddle children.

All non-partitionists, whether liberal or conservative, are supporters of this way of living.

I am a partitionist, and I frankly don't have guns laws in my top ten priorities
because I know that both sides on this issue are completely full of shit.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
The true believers who refuse to accept that gun violence is an integral part of American culture are the truly disingenuous here.

The right to bear arms is a basic human right in America, even if this is the only place on the planet where this is true.

The framers gave the rural states more political power than their percentage of the population justifies.

In a polarized nation, amendments are impossible; this will be the fact of life for however long this republic manages to survive.

The citizens of rural states have made it perfectly clear that slaughtered children are a reasonable price to pay for the right to own assault weaponry.

All of this is self evident.

One would have to be completely incoherent to not recognize this.

The price of keeping our republic in it present configuration is bullet riddle children.

All non-partitionists, whether liberal or conservative, are supporters of this way of living.

I am a partitionist, and I frankly don't have guns laws in my top ten priorities
because I know that both sides on this issue are completely full of shit.
Click to expand...

Interesting position, but, even if one agrees there is a right to carry arms that doesn’t mean that right can not be regulated. No Constitutional right is absolute, they are all regulated, always have been, guns are no different
 
archives said:
Interesting position, but, even if one agrees there is a right to carry arms that doesn’t mean that right can not be regulated. No Constitutional right is absolute, they are all regulated, always have been, guns are no different
Click to expand...

My position as well...
however,
almost every post here suggests
that we either encourage private ownership of nuclear missiles

or

we ban popsicle sticks because they can be easily sharpened.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
My position as well...
however,
almost every post here suggests
that we either encourage private ownership of nuclear missiles

or

we ban popsicle sticks because they can be easily sharpened.
Click to expand...

Seen a few in between, not an either or proposition

Personally, I’d ban certain weapons, however, see no problem with the guy who enjoys his hunting or collects guns as antiques. However, all guns should be registered, private sales restricted, and I’d even go so far as requiring liability insurance, treat guns as we do vehicles. Later ain’t happening on a national level, fine, as long as State laws don’t travel with the gun, and, importing guns to gun restrictive States is severely punished
 
archives said:
Interesting position, but, even if one agrees there is a right to carry arms that doesn’t mean that right can not be regulated. No Constitutional right is absolute, they are all regulated, always have been, guns are no different
Click to expand...

there isn't one single founding father reference in history that makes that claim.
 
archives said:
Seen a few in between, not an either or proposition

Personally, I’d ban certain weapons, however, see no problem with the guy who enjoys his hunting or collects guns as antiques. However, all guns should be registered, private sales restricted, and I’d even go so far as requiring liability insurance, treat guns as we do vehicles. Later ain’t happening on a national level, fine, as long as State laws don’t travel with the gun, and, importing guns to gun restrictive States is severely punished
Click to expand...

I also favor restrictions but less severe than yours.
I categorize true sporting arms as I would golf clubs and bowling balls and skis which don't require registration.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the anti gun zealots and gun hating democrats have been lying out their ass about who commits the majority of mass shootings and/or school shootings

In 2022, only 3% of known school shooters were White. The majority (52%) were committed by the Black demographic
Click to expand...

Dude, there is more to life THAN FUCKING GUNS GUNS GUNS!

Take your guns and shove them up your fucking ass already- for heaven's sake PYLE!

I suggest you get a life!

What a tunnel visioned little person of self-importance and self-interest you are!

I bet your own family hates you for putting your guns above even them!

Instead of taking them on a nice vacation you bought yourself another AR-15! WOW! JUST WOW!

Pathetic and laughable!
 
Last edited:
NiftyNiblick said:
The true believers who refuse to accept that gun violence is an integral part of American culture are the truly disingenuous here.
Click to expand...
The U.S. enjoys a very low homicide rate by guns, currently in 87th place by percentage of people killed with guns. Go look at Honduras, where guns are illegal, currently in 1st place.
NiftyNiblick said:
The right to bear arms is a basic human right in America, even if this is the only place on the planet where this is true.
Click to expand...
The right to self defense is an inherent right. It does not matter whether you are in America or anywhere else. Yes...that means the right to keep and bear arms.
NiftyNiblick said:
The framers gave the rural states more political power than their percentage of the population justifies.
Click to expand...
Random tangent. No apparent coherency. Again, you discard the Constitution. The 'framers' as you put it, did not give anyone any political power. The States ordained the Constitution to power. Only the States have the authority to change it or abolish it.
NiftyNiblick said:
In a polarized nation, amendments are impossible; this will be the fact of life for however long this republic manages to survive.
Click to expand...
They are quite possible. It's been done. Remember the War of Secession or it's aftermath?
NiftyNiblick said:
The citizens of rural states have made it perfectly clear that slaughtered children are a reasonable price to pay for the right to own assault weaponry.
Click to expand...
Slaughtering children has no reasonable price, no matter what weapon is used to do it.
Democrats condone the slaughter of children.
 
archives said:
Interesting position, but, even if one agrees there is a right to carry arms that doesn’t mean that right can not be regulated. No Constitutional right is absolute, they are all regulated, always have been, guns are no different
Click to expand...

Rights do not come from a constitution, dumbass. That is not their purpose.

The right of self defense is inherent. It is absolute. No government can take that away no matter how oppressive that government is.
You just want to discard the Constitution and all State constitutions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top