So you lied - no one mentioned pogroms.So you lied. There were no pogroms.
counting down the days until the left starts calling out the Libertarians asking us why we're not rising up against the government, after being supremely insulted because we dared talk about rising up during a democrat administration.
One hundred percent.At least I know that all of the left-wing members here at JPP will finally agree with all of the right-wing members that obviously believe that anyone on video assaulting officers of the law should and must spend years in prison.
They'd have to, I mean who’s above the law?......right? LOL Maybe we'll hear about context or .......I'm not sure what mental gymnastics they'll use, but I'm sure those people won't deserve to be held accountable, and they'll be considered people hunted by fascist Trump.
I really don't think they've even started healing yet from the shock of not being believed and listened to at all anymore except by complete radical rut cases like libtards here on JPP. Their reporting on the riots is disconnected from reality as usual, it's amazing to watch with some classic hilarious moments of irony and hypocrisy. There are some forever classic clips out there already.
Nobody cares about 'libertarians', they're just a subsidiary of Koch Industries, all 4 of them. they're an internet fantasy, and many are just commie chaos monkies flying false flags. Real libertarians like Jefferson thought deportations were necessary.
Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.
Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816
If that is an insurrection what was January 6th?Bet none of the Stalinist drones here are calling this what it is - insurrection.
Newsom has declared that all molotov cocktails must be electrically powered by 2035.
Evasion. Answer the question put to you.So you lied. There were no pogroms.
Democrats rioting under a false flag.If that is an insurrection what was January 6th?
DON'T TRY TO JUSTIFY YOUR SUPPORT OF RIOTING, LOOTING, ARSON, ORGANIZED CRIME, AND ILLEGAL ALIENS!!Nothing occurring in LA hasn’t occurred in other protests turned violent in the last fifty years, nothing there comes close to the “invasion, rebellion, or danger of rebellion” needed to employ the Insurrection Act, and the biggest comedy is that since they arrived, none of those troops have done anything directly to address the situation
A three-hour riot.If that is an insurrection what was January 6th?
That damaged and occupied the Capitol, caused Congress to flee, and threatened the nation’s VP, certainly fits the conditions of the Insurrection Act more so than LAA three-hour riot.
Right, all them Democrats waving MAGA flags and wearing all the MAGADemocrats rioting under a false flag.
DON'T TRY TO JUSTIFY YOUR SUPPORT OF RIOTING, LOOTING, ARSON, ORGANIZED CRIME, AND ILLEGAL ALIENS!!
FAFO
Oh, yeah. It's totally the "look what the libs made me do" game. So fucking sad what you trumptards consider to be "strength" - arresting waiters and construction workers? I thought it was all about, "criminals and rapists"?
I'm convinced @Uncensored2008 is a Russian troll. Not even a good one!Another master piece of tripe by the Master of Absurdity.
No, it doesn't. Three-hour riot. Insurrections end in the insurrectionists being killed trying to take the government over. Rioters get tired and leave.That damaged and occupied the Capitol, caused Congress to flee, and threatened the nation’s VP, certainly fits the conditions of the Insurrection Act more so than LA
The Insurrection Act specifies “threat of rebellion,” and if attacking and occupying the Capitol, causing Congress to flee their chambers in fear of physical violence, and threatening the VP of the nations isn’t a “threat of a rebellion” nothing isNo, it doesn't. Three-hour riot. Insurrections end in the insurrectionists being killed trying to take the government over. Rioters get tired and leave.
The closest thing to an insurrection of late was Seattle's CHAZ / CHOP zone. That was an insurrection.
There was no "threat of rebellion" on Jan 6. There was a plain old-fashioned riot at the Capitol.The Insurrection Act specifies “threat of rebellion,” and if attacking and occupying the Capitol, causing Congress to flee their chambers in fear of physical violence, and threatening the VP of the nations isn’t a “threat of a rebellion” nothing is
In America’s two hundred plus history how many “three hour riots” has it endured in its Capitol that shut down Congress, had legislators fleeing, and threatened the VP of the country?There was no "threat of rebellion" on Jan 6. There was a plain old-fashioned riot at the Capitol.
Remember Buffalo horns guy on Jan 6?
![]()
What do you think he'd have done if he ran into some Congressmen or the VP as he wandered through the Capitol building?
(this should be good!)
In America’s two hundred plus history how many “three hour riots” has it endured in its Capitol that shut down Congress, had legislators fleeing, and threatened the VP of the country?
As I said, if that isn’t a “threat of rebellion” nothing occurring in LA comes close