DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE COURT. — REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST

B

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
 
blackascoal said:
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
Click to expand...

SCOTUS just allowed a fraudulent election, and they are not good enough for you, not sheep enough for you?
 
If we followed the constitution, it would not matter who is on the court. The constitution says courts cannot write or repeal laws and yet they do it all the time.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
SCOTUS just allowed a fraudulent election, and they are not good enough for you, not sheep enough for you?
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court did not "allow" anything. They are being conservative just as Trump and his supporters have been asking for.--staying out of political issues, staying out of state issues, and narrowly interpreting the Constitution sticking to the text. The opposite of "activist" judges.
 
blackascoal said:
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
Click to expand...

Fuck off, what a load of bullshit! HR-1 is the biggest assault on democracy in decades! I have lost any respect that I ever had for you as should any fair-minded person.

HR-1 Guts Free Speech, Fair Elections, States’ Rights

https://amac.us/hr-1-guts-free-speech-fair-elections-states-rights/
 
tinfoil said:
Take your meds
Click to expand...

...or eat a good 'ole American grilled Ham & Cheese sammy ;)


grilled-cheese-ham-today-170411-tease_2b8383ef006f363558f25c8c168ecbc9.today-inline-large.jpg
 
Seems to be the way. At least we will get qualified judges rated by the American Bar Association, instead of fucked up loser hacks who have zero experience
or qualifications like many of Trump's morons.


"...for decades after it was founded in 1878, the ABA hadno special role in the selection of federal judges. That changed in1952, when the Eisenhower administration solicited the views ofthe ABA on judicial nominees, reportedly in an attempt to reducethe likelihood that senators could successfully push for thenomination of unqualified political cronies.3"

Who Rates Prospective Federal Judges for the American Bar Association? (rwu.edu)
 
blackascoal said:
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
Click to expand...

What a load of bollocks!
 
tinfoil said:
Angry people like you suck
Click to expand...

What you percieve as “angry” is actually best described as “Disdain” .. because that’s exactly what it is. You wimpys are in constant pain and anger on this board every fucking day, but you expect what? Civility? Respect?

TDAK has posted his anger here since birth. Wonder how many times you tell him about his anger?

Don’t look now genius, but your avatar is a reflection of you. Some angry asshole who can’t deal with his own failures so he blames other people for his lack of self-esteem. Just piss on all of ‘em. Piss on the world world, children included. That’s you.

I wrote a song for you ,, It’s called “Butt-Hurt Love” You sing it everytime you post.

Does that sound like I’m angry or does it sound like I’m playing with a clown and having fun doing it? You choose.
 
2 wrongs never make a right.
Keep pushing and all commies in America will be dead.
IMO, America will be better off for that happening.
 
blackascoal said:
What you percieve as “angry” is actually best described as “Disdain” .. because that’s exactly what it is. You wimpys are in constant pain and anger on this board every fucking day, but you expect what? Civility? Respect?

TDAK has posted his anger here since birth. Wonder how many times you tell him about his anger?

Don’t look now genius, but your avatar is a reflection of you. Some angry asshole who can’t deal with his own failures so he blames other people for his lack of self-esteem. Just piss on all of ‘em. Piss on the world world, children included. That’s you.

I wrote a song for you ,, It’s called “Butt-Hurt Love” You sing it everytime you post.

Does that sound like I’m angry or does it sound like I’m playing with a clown and having fun doing it? You choose.
Click to expand...

Well then, enjoy yourself
 
tinfoil said:
Well then, enjoy yourself
Click to expand...

... and I do indeed. I’m here for the comedy and I like seeing you on stage. :)

That being said, I would rather engage in honest, civil and respectful political discourse with anyone capable of serious conversation, irrespective of who and/or what they are. There is no intellectual argument for racism, so if I’m talking to a racist, it’s all about the comedy..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top