DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE COURT. — REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST

The Repub lawyer admitted that the Supreme case they are bringing has the purpose of cutting down Dem votes so the reds would have an even playing field. He should have been thrown out on their ass. Instead, this court is taking the case into consideration.
If they approve it, then the Dems should pack the court. The Trumpies are flexing their hate muscles. Trump set the court up to be far-right. Why shouldn't the Dems do the same?
 
anatta said:
Libya's Legacy of Obama’s ‘Worst Mistake’
There’s a problem with the American way of war.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/04/obamas-worst-mistake-libya/478461/
It was a cheap war for the United States at just $1.1 billion.
But these days, it seems, a billion dollars buys you a shit show. Libya could end up looking like,
in the words of British special envoy Jonathan Powell, “Somalia on the Mediterranean.”
Click to expand...

I agree on Obama’s crime and horror against Libya, which was no different than the Bush crimes and horror against Iraq, but what does that have to do with the Supreme Court?
 
blackascoal said:
Racism isn’t funny, but if I’m talking to a racist, that conversation can only be about the comedy given that they would be incapable in engaging is serious conversation. Racism requires the ignorance of the believer.
Click to expand...

Do those with Spiritual beliefs also fall into your "category," silly as it seems?
 
blackascoal said:
I agree on Obama’s crime and horror against Libya, which was no different than the Bush crimes and horror against Iraq, but what does that have to do with the Supreme Court?
Click to expand...
someone mentioned Qaddafi in passing...

Good Brother;do you believe it's been 10 years already?
Libya is sliced up by regional big powers ( Turkey,Egypt,Russia, UAE, Qatar, etc) and still stalemated civil war

Plus now the slave trade -since Tripoli cant stop the smuggling ....ISIS.. FUBAR
 
dukkha said:
i read it.
nominating a replacement is not "packing"
Click to expand...

YES, IT IS when Garland is denied a confirmation hearing based on a rule that McConell just made up and pulled out of his ass about his confirmation would have been too close to an election, then nominate and confirm Barrett damn near on the day of the election. Clearly stated in the article and clearly known to all who know the politics of what republicans have done. Your only argument can be that your side gets to do whatever it wants but democrats have to play by any rules McConnell pull out of his ass.

Surely that’s not your argument.

ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES. who said that?
 
Last edited:
dukkha said:
someone mentioned Qaddafi in passing...

Good Brother;do you believe it's been 10 years already?
Libya is sliced up by regional big powers ( Turkey,Egypt,Russia, UAE, Qatar, etc) and still stalemated civil war

Plus now the slave trade -since Tripoli cant stop the smuggling ....ISIS.. FUBAR
Click to expand...

Mark me down as being against the attack on Libya from the moment it was concieved. There are plenty of witnesses on this board on your side who will validate the truth of that. In fact that’s why Anatta posted about Libya in this thread .. to distract from the conversation that he cannot defend.

Obama’s attack on Libya was a Crime Against Humanity and validates why I never voted for him. I knew he was weak enough to engage in this kind of senseless horror.
 
blackascoal said:
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
Click to expand...
your a moron what your taking about is completely different and you know it. trump appointed justices when others left packing the court is a totally different thing, it means adding positions and putting people in only based on politics . the court has no need for additional justices
 
blackascoal said:
You are obviously a right wing Republican, today best known for climbing up the walls of the Capitol trying to kill Mike Pence to destroy democracy, supporting the lies of THE worst president in American history, and believing that Hilary Clinton eats children and Jewish laser beams from outer space cause wildfires in California ... while socialism keeps your parents and millions of American seniors alive.

:corn: Next
Click to expand...

Compared to millions? I'll pass.
 
blackascoal said:
I agree on Obama’s crime and horror against Libya, which was no different than the Bush crimes and horror against Iraq, but what does that have to do with the Supreme Court?
Click to expand...
When gnatta'a brain crashes he reboots to about 2011 and all data after that is lost.
 
Bulletbob said:
your a moron what your taking about is completely different and you know it. trump appointed justices when others left packing the court is a totally different thing, it means adding positions and putting people in only based on politics . the court has no need for additional justices
Click to expand...

First, YOU’RE a moron, and if you read the article you would agree.
 
Concart said:
False premise. Post rejected.
Click to expand...

Not a false premise. (1) Chief Justice John Roberts is a well-known liberal and closet "Never Trumper". He and Trump had had numerous spectacular personal clashes on platforms like Twitter before Trump's election fraud case was presented to the Supreme Court; (2) Combine this with the fact that the SCOTUS simply "chickened out" in rejecting Trump legal argument - the sorry fact is that they just didn't have the guts to do the right thing.... Absolutely F**KING disgraceful.


Dachshund
 
Dachshund said:
(1) Chief Justice John Roberts is a well-known liberal and closet "Never Trumper".
Click to expand...

How do you know that?


He and Drumpf had had numerous spectacular personal clashes on platforms like Twitter before Drumpf's election fraud case was presented to the Supreme Court
Click to expand...

What were the clashes over?


Combine this with the fact that the SCOTUS simply "chickened out" in rejecting Drumpf legal argument
Click to expand...

What was the legal argument?


the sorry fact is that they just didn't have the guts to do the right thing
Click to expand...

What was "the right thing"?
 
Winston Smith said:
Compared to millions? I'll pass.
Click to expand...


I have no idea what that means but I’m pretty sure it won’t make any difference.

It isn’t just your parents being kept kept alive by socialism.

I’d suggest you pick another topic. You don’t appear versed enough to debate socialism with a socialist ... no offense intended.
 
blackascoal said:
REPUBLICANS HAVE LAUNCED AN ALL OUT OBVIOUS ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR NON WHITE AMERICANS. GIVEN THAT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST BE PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH REPUBLICANS HAVE ALREADY PACKED, IT IS TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO RESPOND AND PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE. AFTER TRUMP’S LOSS IN THE 2020 ELECTION AND GIVEN THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN’T WON THE POPULAR VOTE IN OBER 30 YEARS .. AND GIVEN THE DECLINING NUMBER OF AMERICANS THAT IDENTIFY AS REPUBLICANS THROUGH MANY DYING OUT AND THEIR OWN IGNORANCE, THEY KNOW THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN STAY COMPETITIVE INTO THE FUTURE IS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO VOTING BY NONWHITE AMERICANS, WHOSE VOTE THEY ALMOST NEVER WIN.

DEMOCRATS CAN INCREASE THE NUMBERS ON THE COURT ABSOLUTELY. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS THEM IS TIMIDITY AND A FALSE BELIEF IN BIPERTISANSHIP THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN.

DEMOCRATS SHOULD PACK THE SUPREME COURT, REPUBLICANS DID IT FIRST
— HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW

WITH THE PASSING OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG LAST YEAR AND THE SUCCESSFUL RUSH BY REPUBLICANS TO CONFIRM CONSERVATIVE AMY BARRETT AS A REPLACEMENT, THE IDEA OF COURT PACKING, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES FROM 9, HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY DISCUSSED AMONG LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC CIRCLES. REPUBLICANS LIKE TED CRUZ HAVE ASSAILED DEMOCRATS FOR THESE PROPOSALS, DEEMING THEM ATTACKS OM THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NATION. SUCH CRITIQUES IGNORE THE WAYS THAT REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS HAVE ALREADY VIOLATED THE EXISTING CONVENTIONS REGARDING FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS., MANY OF WHICH THEY THEMSELVES SET. ACCORDINGLY DEMOCRATS DESIRES TO REFORM THE COURT SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DEFENSIVE RESPONSE TO PRESERVE THE FAIRNESS OF THE COURT RATHER THAN AN OFFENSIVE ATTEMPT TO CORRUPT IT.

harvardpolitics.com
Click to expand...

WHAT UTTER NONSENSE.

PLEASE SPECIFY HOW "THE RIGHT TO VOTE" HAS BEEN ATTACKED...FOR ANYONE.
 
Dachshund said:
Not a false premise. (1) Chief Justice John Roberts is a well-known liberal and closet "Never Trumper". He and Trump had had numerous spectacular personal clashes on platforms like Twitter before Trump's election fraud case was presented to the Supreme Court; (2) Combine this with the fact that the SCOTUS simply "chickened out" in rejecting Trump legal argument - the sorry fact is that they just didn't have the guts to do the right thing.... Absolutely F**KING disgraceful.


Dachshund
Click to expand...

John Roberts does not do Twitter. He very rarely makes public statements, the idea he is a 'never Trumper' is laughable. As is the idea that the election was stolen. Or that SCOTUS 'chickened out'. Sorry poochie.
 
Grokmaster said:
WHAT UTTER NONSENSE.

PLEASE SPECIFY HOW "THE RIGHT TO VOTE" HAS BEEN ATTACKED...FOR ANYONE.
Click to expand...

If this was anyone else but you I would attempt to sanely and civily discuss the rationale behind the VRA, but because its you, whom I know to be a racist and an imbecile, I won’t waste my time .. but here is a bone for you .. why the fuck do you think the VRA even exists? I suspect that you can’t even pass that test.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top