Dems to lose Senate.

I think your memory of GWB's early time in office is basically fucked and after 9/11, not too many months later, he got unparalelled support from all corners. Bush's first major policiy initiative, the 2001 tax cuts, got support from Democrats in both houses. Obama's first major policy initiative, the Stimulus bill, which was passed in the midst of a major economic crisis garnered 3 Republican votes, one of which was from Specter.

Apparently your memory is lacking; did you forget the attempts by Democrats to steal the election by divining votes from hanging chads and the angry mob like attitudes that the Bush Presidency was illegitimate? How about the lies about his National Guard service and how he was unqualified to serve as Commander and Chief?

You Liberals don't just wallow in hypocrisy and selective outrage, you submerge in it.
 
i actually disagree with this. Yeah that's the common sterotype but I think just looking at the republican party you can see that they don't budge very much regardless which way the political wind blows, sometimes to their own detriment. In fact I just saw some analysis of this the other day (which I may go search for after this post) that showed republicans are far far farrr more likely to not deviate in more liberal states vs. liberals will deviate from their parties platform in many conservative areas.
Un huh....you're forgetting that all politics is local and trust me....if that wind of change blows locally then those anal retentive conservatives will change with the wind two. First law of politics. Get elected. None of the other principles of politics matter if you don't meet the first law of politics.
 
FACT: GW Bush disobeyed a direct order from his TANG superior officer to report for his annual flight physical. As a result of not taking the physical, he was removed from flight status. Oddly enough, any documentation regarding any disciplinary action taken against him for disobeying that order has been strangely lost in the National Guard archives.

I don't know how they do things in Texas, but I do know that, throughout my service, if I had ever disobeyed a direct order from my superior officer, there would be a record of that in my service record and my career would have been over as of that moment.
 
If the only reason people have to vote for her is a lack of a Y chromosome what does that say about her dirth of accomplishment ? Of course americans elected a guy with nothing more to hang his hat in than melanin so what does that say about the electorate ? At least Bubba and W were govenors, requires some executive doings. BO had nada (and it shows). So people now know why experience matters.
LOL Well not only do you have limited reading comprehension skills, as observed by your reply to my comment, but if you're going to hang your hat on W.....the single most incompetent US President since Warren G. Harding...LOL Well let's just say you don't have much going for you in the crediblity department. LOL LOL LOL
 
Hill did fall on her sword for the whole bengazi bullshit. whether she was at fault or not that's how a lot of americans probably perceive that.
Guess how many people except for right wing partisan ideologues give a shit about the trumped up Benghazi attack? Bout none. Know why? Cause far more State Department employees died by an order of magnitude under the Bush administration than under the Obama administration. Benghazi is just more partisan hackery and anyone with half a brain knows that.
 
as much as assholes like Nova and his brethren would love to keep Benghazi in the public eye.... it will be very old news come 2016 campaign season.... it will be seasoned, experienced Hillary against some GOP yahoo who will have had to go hard right and suck a mile of tea party cock to get the nomination and will be unable to shake the etch-a-sketch and hop back towards the middle where all those housewives will be chomping at the bit to vote for a fellow vagina owner for president. It's a done deal as far as I can tell.... as long as she decides to do it.
Which won't mean shit if the GOP can find a charismatic candidate that can communicate a clear message and plan for his policies and can stay on message and can gain the GOP nomination without veering so far to the right that he/she loses credibility with the national public. You're making a big strategis error if you think Hilliary being nominated is #1, a done deal and #2, a sure thing if she is.
 
For all the righties here who claim Hillary has no experience or knowledge to be prez, I guess you'll be writing off the eye doctor as a serious contender.

What "eye" doctor is that? Once again you don't know what you're talking about. But let's assume you are talking about Dr. Benjamin Carson; he's a professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and pediatrics, and he was the director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Not close to an "eye" doctor.

When did Ben announce his candidacy?
 
Guess how many people except for right wing partisan ideologues give a shit about the trumped up Benghazi attack? Bout none. Know why? Cause far more State Department employees died by an order of magnitude under the Bush administration than under the Obama administration. Benghazi is just more partisan hackery and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Guess what... Bush is not running. Hillary is. While I agree it won't be a big issue in 2016, you are quite retarded to pretend that people won't care simply because 'more died under Bush'. More died under Johnson than anyone. OMG OMG OMG OMG...
 
Which won't mean shit if the GOP can find a charismatic candidate that can communicate a clear message and plan for his policies and can stay on message and can gain the GOP nomination without veering so far to the right that he/she loses credibility with the national public. You're making a big strategis error if you think Hilliary being nominated is #1, a done deal and #2, a sure thing if she is.

I don't think that either is the case. I do think that she is the odds on favorite to win the democratic nomination, and I also happen to believe that, with the ascendancy of the tea bagger movement in the GOP, their primary process will force the successful candidate to run much further to the right than they would otherwise need to or want to and will hamper their ability to shake the etch-a-sketch and instantaneously reposition themselves closer to the middle where all the votes are.
 
THEY did?

PROVE it or retract it.

PROVE that Obama got the majority of democratic women primary voters.

I'll wait.

Yes, they had the opportunity. It was Obama vs. Hillary. So the women had the same opportunity they would have had if it was Hillary vs. McCain. . I didn't state that he won the majority of women, I stated they had the opportunity to vote for a woman for President, but enough women chose Obama to swing it in his favor
 
like David Vitter.... got it.

Up to your typical dishonest deflections again aren't you slum dweller? So how is Vitter's sin anything remotely similar to Clinton's?

If we are going to engage in deflecting, how about we chat about Gerry Eastman Studds? Here's an openly gay Democrat who admitted sex with an underage male intern and then was re-elected to the House six more times and then in 1990, Studds was appointed chair of the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.

How many Republicans would survive a scandal of that magnitude and then be given a chairmanship shit-for-brains?

How about these Democrats: http://www.ranker.com/list/democrat-sex-scandals/web-infoguy?format=SLIDESHOW&page=10

How about these: http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Democrat-Extra-Marital-Affairs.htm

You leftist dunces have the memory of an earthworm and then presume the hypocritical audacity to point your fingers at others? It takes an amazing level of ignorance and misguided hutzpah to be THAT stupid.
 
I'm on phone and don't know how to post the link but just saw Hillary barely won a majority of democratic women voters in '08. That doesn't mean they won't vote big time for her in '16 but they didn't seem to jump at the chance in '08.
 
Well if you want to do is destroy the country so you can rebuild all you need to do is elect another southern conservative. Good luck with that. ;)

An amazing, yet false and stupid claim; you just can't help yourself can you?

Meanwhile, Obama, the man low information voters elected on nothing more substantive than hope and change, the most inexperienced, inept, divisive, arrogant hyper partisan President to ever inhabit the White House, continues to refuse to assume any blame for the malaise of this economy and massive deficits after five years and still points his finger at Bush and Republicans.

You just can't make this stuff up.
 
Un huh....you're forgetting that all politics is local and trust me....if that wind of change blows locally then those anal retentive conservatives will change with the wind two. First law of politics. Get elected. None of the other principles of politics matter if you don't meet the first law of politics.

Still making your crap up as you go eh?
 
FACT: GW Bush disobeyed a direct order from his TANG superior officer to report for his annual flight physical. As a result of not taking the physical, he was removed from flight status. Oddly enough, any documentation regarding any disciplinary action taken against him for disobeying that order has been strangely lost in the National Guard archives.

I don't know how they do things in Texas, but I do know that, throughout my service, if I had ever disobeyed a direct order from my superior officer, there would be a record of that in my service record and my career would have been over as of that moment.

FACT: Bush was discharged honorably from the Texas National Guard.

I am now anxiously awaiting the next lie and deflection from the Mexican slum dwelling expat stuck on hyper partisan stupidity.
 
LOL Well not only do you have limited reading comprehension skills, as observed by your reply to my comment, but if you're going to hang your hat on W.....the single most incompetent US President since Warren G. Harding...LOL Well let's just say you don't have much going for you in the crediblity department. LOL LOL LOL

Another dishonest lie; you just cannot help yourself can you Comrade?
 
Back
Top