Demthugs Side with Terrorists on DC National Guard Shooting

Jake Starkey said:
So you agree it was during Trump's admin. No, the final approval came during Trump's admin.
Click to expand...
I do not agree that it was Trump's employees or even at his direction. What I get is how badly you want it to be his fault, because you don't like feeling like your man just kept letting people in that kills Americans. I suspect you understand the reality, but want it to be something Trump did so badly you will pretend to be stupid to keep that thought rather than pay attention to information.

Vetting was not done under Trump, both times were under Braindead, then Biden employees gave him asylum after the parole period ended. Braindead's vetting leaves much to be desired.
 
Damocles said:

Timeline and Personnel Breakdown​


Lakanwal entered the U.S. on September 8, 2021, via OAW humanitarian parole after working with U.S. forces (including CIA partner units in Kandahar since ~2011). He had an active Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) application but was paroled under OAW due to the chaotic evacuation.

PhaseDateKey ActionsPersonnel InvolvedAppointed By / Holdover?
Initial Vetting & Entry2021 (pre-arrival & upon entry)Biometric (fingerprints, iris) & biographic checks; CIA background for prior work; no disqualifiers found. Handled via OAW at transit sites (e.g., Qatar) and U.S. ports.DHS (CBP/USCIS line officers), DoD, FBI, NCTC analysts (~400 total personnel).Biden appointees/holdovers: OAW launched Sept. 2021 under Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas; staff hired/retained from Obama/Trump eras but operating Biden's expedited policy. No Trump influence (he left office Jan. 2021).
Ongoing/Annual Re-Vetting2021–2025Continuous database checks (e.g., post-2024 Oklahoma plot); still "clean" per DHS.Same interagency teams, primarily DHS/USCIS.Biden holdovers: Policy continuity; minimal turnover until 2025 transition.
Asylum GrantApril 2025Reviewed parole status for permanent protection; approved based on persecution risk and prior vetting.USCIS asylum officers/adjudicators.Mostly Biden holdovers: Trump's DHS appointees (e.g., Noem confirmed Jan. 25) oversaw high-level policy, but frontline USCIS staff (thousands) were career civil servants or recent Biden hires. No full purge; acting officials handled April cases under Trump's emerging reviews.

It takes time to completely take over a department, and USCIS asylum officers/adjudicators were not fired by DOGE, etc. Those people were either lifetime employees or hired by the Biden Administration. While the final grant came after he took office, there was no large turnover in that department, these were not "Trump Employees"... The vetting took place under Biden, and his hires gave the final nod for his Asylum.
Click to expand...
There are the key words - “lifetime employees”.

Whoever did the vetting, either in Afghanistan or in the US, no doubt were career people using the same protocols as any other administration.
 
Damocles said:
I do not agree that it was Trump's employees or even at his direction. What I get is how badly you want it to be his fault, because you don't like feeling like your man just kept letting people in that kills Americans. I suspect you understand the reality, but want it to be something Trump did so badly you will pretend to be stupid to keep that thought rather than pay attention to information.

Vetting was not done under Trump, both times were under Braindead, then Biden employees gave him asylum after the parole period ended. Braindead's vetting leaves much to be desired.
Click to expand...
What process was different than previous administrations or this one?
 
domer76 said:
What process was different than any other administration? What info about his background did they miss in 2021 or subsequent vettings?
Click to expand...
The difference is that the programs were specific to Afghani Evacuees, it was handled through specialized programs like Operation Allies Refuge (OAR) and Operation Allies Welcome (OAW). These programs were created under Biden, and specific to his desperate escape/retreat "plan". The core difference was expedited, pre-arrival focused vetting via parole versus post-arrival over adjudicated asylum proceedings.
 

Noem says National Guard shooting suspect was 'radicalized' in the U.S.​


Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that authorities believe the suspect in the National Guard shooting was radicalized in the U.S. and that the asylum process for migrants would resume once the administration has dealt with a backlog of applications under new standards following the attack.

news.yahoo.com

Noem says National Guard shooting suspect was 'radicalized' in the U.S.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that authorities believe the suspect in the National Guard shooting was radicalized in the U.S. and that the asylum process for migrants would resume once the administration has dealt with a backlog of applications.
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
 
Damocles said:
The difference is that the programs were specific to Afghani Evacuees, it was handled through specialized programs like Operation Allies Refuge (OAR) and Operation Allies Welcome (OAW). These programs were created under Biden, and specific to his desperate escape/retreat "plan". The core difference was expedited, pre-arrival focused vetting via parole versus post-arrival over adjudicated asylum proceedings.
Click to expand...
The question, pally boy, is for you to identify the so-called major failure here. Including the vetting in his “post-arrival, adjudicated asylum proceedings” under Trump. So far, I’ve see no evidence that it did.

This guy was living here peacefully for several years. Something went wrong, but it wasn’t the Afghanistan vettings.
 
Guno צְבִי said:

Noem says National Guard shooting suspect was 'radicalized' in the U.S.​


Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that authorities believe the suspect in the National Guard shooting was radicalized in the U.S. and that the asylum process for migrants would resume once the administration has dealt with a backlog of applications under new standards following the attack.

news.yahoo.com

Noem says National Guard shooting suspect was 'radicalized' in the U.S.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that authorities believe the suspect in the National Guard shooting was radicalized in the U.S. and that the asylum process for migrants would resume once the administration has dealt with a backlog of applications.
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
Click to expand...
I don’t believe a fucking word coming out of this administration.
 
Damocles said:
I do not agree that it was Trump's employees or even at his direction. What I get is how badly you want it to be his fault, because you don't like feeling like your man just kept letting people in that kills Americans. I suspect you understand the reality, but want it to be something Trump did so badly you will pretend to be stupid to keep that thought rather than pay attention to information.

Vetting was not done under Trump, both times were under Braindead, then Biden employees gave him asylum after the parole period ended. Braindead's vetting leaves much to be desired.
Click to expand...
I don't agree with your disagreement.

This seems to a mental break down as much as anything.
 
Grokmaster said:
It wasn't Trump who brought him here, was it?


I like how you support murderous terrorists crossing the country to murder National Guard volunteers....typical Treason-o-crat bullshit, just like defending the cartels, as well.
Click to expand...
Kristi Noam is on tv saying this guy was 'radicalized here' in America, meaning this is on Trump and Biden cannot be blamed.

Biden made the right choice to let him and the Trump team completely missed doing any follow up before granting this guy his status. And considering they believe Biden was not actually doing his work, that is huge negligence by the Trump team and they now own this.
 
Crepitus said:
tRump created the current climate of hate.

tRump sent an inexperienced woman into that climate.

tRump vetted and granted asylum to the shooter.

tRump made sure it was easy to get a gun.

I'm not seeing any Democratic involvement here at all.
Click to expand...
Another thing I keep seeing is comment number two. These idiots, along with the rest of the brainwashed horde, keep whining that National Guard soldiers 'aren’t trained” for this mission. Seriously, what special training do they need in a supposedly peaceful city that has zero crime problem, according to these geniuses?

They’re there to deter criminals who, again according to you dumbasses, don’t even exist. But sure, if the Guard isn’t 'trained well enough,' how about the regular citizens who walk those same streets every single day without body armor or riot gear? The way these radicals carry on, you’d think cold-blooded murder of two young troops is just inevitable. Why wouldn’t it happen? Trump basically asked for it and more will come if he doesn’t back off. Somehow in their mind that is normal thinking. Or maybe it’s that they can’t understand normal thinking.(See what I did there :))
 
Damocles said:
The difference is that the programs were specific to Afghani Evacuees, it was handled through specialized programs like Operation Allies Refuge (OAR) and Operation Allies Welcome (OAW). These programs were created under Biden, and specific to his desperate escape/retreat "plan". The core difference was expedited, pre-arrival focused vetting via parole versus post-arrival over adjudicated asylum proceedings.
Click to expand...
That’s a fair assessment that is factual.

I believe you said that you are a follower of Buddhism.

Don’t Buddhists believe bovines are sacred?

Is a bovine your “Sky Jockey,” just kidding.

My brother, while in Divinity School, studied Buddhism and spoke favorably about it.
 
Earl said:
That’s a fair assessment that is factual.

I believe you said that you are a follower of Buddhism.

Don’t Buddhists believe bovines are sacred?

Is a bovine your “Sky Jockey,” just kidding.

My brother, while in Divinity School, studied Buddhism and spoke favorably about it.
Click to expand...
That would be Hindus not Buddhists, so no. Also, I am a Theravada Buddhist, there is no "sky daddy" there.... Buddha did not speak to the existence or non-existence of any "sky daddy".
 
domer76 said:
The question, pally boy, is for you to identify the so-called major failure here. Including the vetting in his “post-arrival, adjudicated asylum proceedings” under Trump. So far, I’ve see no evidence that it did.

This guy was living here peacefully for several years. Something went wrong, but it wasn’t the Afghanistan vettings.
Click to expand...
You apparently missed a word. Go back, read again.
 
Jake Starkey said:
I don't agree with your disagreement.

This seems to a mental break down as much as anything.
Click to expand...
lol. I don't agree with your disagreement to my disagreement, because this is just silliness.

Jake says, "I don't like your opinion, so I'll just say 'no' and pretend that you having a different opinion than myself means that you are broken."
 
Damocles said:
That would be Hindus not Buddhists, so no. Also, I am a Theravada Buddhist, there is no "sky daddy" there.... Buddha did not speak to the existence or non-existence of any "sky daddy".
Click to expand...
Yes, “sky daddies” not sky jockeys.

Are cows considered holy in Buddhism?

Cattle are considered sacred in the Indian religions of Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism, as well as in some Chinese folk religion and in traditional African religions. Cattle played other major roles in many religions, including those of ancient Egypt, ancient Greece, ancient Israel, and ancient Rome.


The last paragraph is a bit ambiguous..
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top