Department of Defense defines Weapon of Mass Destruction... DIX-Owned!

Sarin gas that is not degraded and is in a form and quantity capable of being delivered to the enemy and causing mass casualties is most certainly a weapon of mass destruction.

-------------

And there you have it....exactly why I put my 2 cents in....Dixie speaks for himself and not for me....its Jarods stupid remark that Sarin gas in not recognized as WMD by the DOD.....thats wrong..and that was his claim....chemical weapons are chemical weapons, the DOD does not have to list EVERY chemical by name and that was his idioic claim...Sarin is not mentioned by name.....so its not a WMD....thats usually the kind of word games you like to play.....but we are talking about weapons in particular....and Sarin gas used as a weapon is WMD....word games are for children and losers.....
in this case, Jarod is a loser.....
You and Dixie can argue about what to call a degraded chemical weapon or an inert nuclear bomb....have fun....
 
whatever.... Jarod would not have even started this thread if Dixie had not insisted that WMD's had been found in Iraq.

and fuck you, by the way....I don't play word games...it is YOU whio obsessively follows me around from thread to thread seeing if you can catch me in some grammatical slip up.

My position on Iraq has been clear and unwavering. It was a dumb idea that has done us way more harm than good and has cost us dearly for that harm

...and every single one of my predictions about it have come true while every single one of YOUR predictions and DIXIE's predictions and DUBYA's and WOLFIE'S and PERLE's and RUMMY's have been wrong.
 
I was in this thread before you asshole....when you see my name...just butt the fuck out....you're creepy anyway....there is an ignore feature, use it and won't get your ass kicked so often...
 
Quite a tapdancer....

I point out that Jarod is full of shit....and I'm right

You...try to lump me in with whatever the hell Dixie is saying....you're wrong

Then after a couple of pointless posts...you say whatever...whatever?
and then comes the personal attack.....

Its.............."the pattern"....the "MO"....
Yeah...your ass is mine......................as always.....but it was fun..for me.
Learn to respect you elders....we think more clearly...never let political hate cloud our thinking....its right and wrong, not right and left..
 
Jarod is full of shit only when you get down to nit picking - your forte.... his beef with Dixie was that the dumbfuck continued to say that Saddam's WMD's had been found.... and that these rusty old cannisters are the proof. Did Jarod say that Sarin was not a WMD? I guess he did.... is that as important as the bigger issue concerning whether or not Saddam had any WMD's? Obviously, to you, it is.

But we can always count on your to crawl around on a thread like a tick bird on the back of a hippo picking away at all the minutiae... the hippo doesn't pay much attention to the bird.... similarly, your "contributions" are equally irrelevant.
 
bravo said:
Jarod says...
Its just a fact, according to the DOD, see cite above... for something to be a WMD it must be capable of massive destruction. Degraded Seirn and small amounts of Seirn are not capable of massive destruction thus it follows for those intelegent enough to understand the basic rules of logic that not all seirn gas is a WMD!
--------------

Changing your tune a mite Jerry....wasn't too long ago you were insisting that Srin Gas wasn't a WMD..period....

Now you're down with the quanity and quality....at least you're coming around to realize that Sarin Gas is a WMD....you're just looking more stupid in this debate....I guess you'll be telling Dix that 1 spore of Anthrax can't kill anybody so Anthrax can't be a WMD either.....

* The definition in the U.S. Code, Title 50, "War and National Defense," includes radiological weapons. It defines WMD as "any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of - (A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors; (B) a disease organism; or (C) radiation or radioactivity."
Click to expand...



I never said Seirn was not a WMD peirod, you fucking lying idiot!
 
bravo said:
Maine, you seem to be missing a major part of the thread...Jarrod was saying the Sarin gas IS NOT a WMD, period....read over his posts...not only these particular degraded ones.....but SARIN gas, period....

You're right , some folks will never admit they just be wrong....I can give Dixie the fact that at least these discovered shells were once WMD but they arn't NOW....but Jarrod is just completely off the wagon, Sarin is certainly considered a WMD....
Click to expand...



Again, I never said that you idiot! Dont put words in my mouth.. come up with quotes if you are going to make such claims.:pke:
 
bravo said:
Sarin gas that is not degraded and is in a form and quantity capable of being delivered to the enemy and causing mass casualties is most certainly a weapon of mass destruction.
Click to expand...


I have always agreed with that from day one!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top