Deplorable Roy Moore accused of engaging in underaged rape. Nice pick, Bannon.

[PostmodernProphet]

If the allegations are prove true in the next few weeks, will you demand that Moore withdraw from the race?

obviously.....and if your proven to be a lying sack of shit (which is far more likely) will you climb back in your nest and stfu?.......

 

[Русский агент]

I am truly sickened by the republican response to these allegations, particularly those coming out of the Alabama local officials. Did you know that since this happened so long ago, it doesn't count?

Were you "truly" sickened by the DEMOCRAT response when women came forward to accuse Bill Clinton after years of silence, cum gargler?

If the allegations are proven to be true, I will condemn Moore, unlike many DEMOCRATS, who still support Bill Clinton because "his accusers waited so long they aren't credible," cum gargler.

 

[floridafan]

obviously.....and if your proven to be a lying sack of shit (which is far more likely) will you climb back in your nest and stfu?.......

There aint a chance in the world that your kind would ever demand the withdrawal of Moore. Right kuntface?

 

[Русский агент]

I’m late to the party on this.

But I’m suspicious of the charge given the timing of it.

So would certain others be, apparently - except that Moore isn't a DEMOCRAT.

Here's what they had to say about Clinton's accusers:

Prove any of those women are survivors of Sexual Assault!

Those people are not survivors of Sexual Assault.

"But you DON'T have a right to wait 20+ years, until it is politically advantageous, to raise your voice." A pity not a one of those women came forward AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ASSAULT to make their claims.

Except for the couple he had a consensual affair with, every single report of "assault" came YEARS later. NOT A ONE was immediately reported to the proper authorities.

Why did they wait so long to tell their stories if he really did what they allege?

Tthe fact those women waited until a few months before the election to suddenly decide they needed justice is a bit convenient.

Of course, they'll probably claim that the "context" is different, or something.

 

[Русский агент]

There aint a chance in the world that your kind would ever demand the withdrawal of Moore. Right kuntface?

Let's see if the charges are true, cum gargler.

If they are, I'll be glad to demand that Moore withdraw. You do know that Trump backed his opponent, right?

 

[Русский агент]

The only way he should stay in the race is if he is shown to be innocent. If guilt is proven, then he should step down. This is not a religious issue. all people face consequences for their actions.

I suspect that little Thingy harbors a particular animus toward Christian evangelicals, Ms. Stretch.

 

[Русский агент]

If, in the next few weeks, the allegations are prove true, will you demand the Moore withdraw?

I will.

Get back to me if and when it happens and I'll confirm that, cum gargler.

 

[Jarod]

Really? Is it noted counselor? From the very WaPo article you are masturbating over

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html

“These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign,” Moore, now 70, said.

The campaign said in a subsequent statement that if the allegations were true they would have surfaced during his previous campaigns, adding “this garbage is the very definition of fake news.”

Seems to me like he is denying the details. Are you a liar or uninformed?

Did he say anything about what "These allegations..." are? Did he know the girl but not touch her? Did he take her to his apartment not his house? Did he never meet her at all? Did he only touch her left tit, not both?

 

[Jarod]

Remember this?

Hillary's campaign deleted the line, "You have the right to be believed," from the page on its site, though there is still video of Clinton saying it.

The website originally read: "I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed, and we're with you," quoting Clinton.

The last part of the quote has since been removed.


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/291434-clinton-made-edits-to-campus-sexual-assault-page-after

You guys always conveniently forget the qualifier, IF YOU ARE A VICTIM. If you are making it up, you do not have the right to be believed.

 

[Русский агент]

You guys always conveniently forget the qualifier, IF YOU ARE A VICTIM. If you are making it up, you do not have the right to be believed.

Really, Brad?

Does it look as though I forgot that the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty?

It does look as though you have, doesn't it?

Of course, your skepticism regarding female accusers seems a trifle selective.

Here's what they had to say about Clinton's accusers:

Prove any of those women are survivors of Sexual Assault!

Those people are not survivors of Sexual Assault.

Zappacrite appears to share your selective skepticism, Brad.

"But you DON'T have a right to wait 20+ years, until it is politically advantageous, to raise your voice." A pity not a one of those women came forward AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ASSAULT to make their claims.

Except for the couple he had a consensual affair with, every single report of "assault" came YEARS later. NOT A ONE was immediately reported to the proper authorities.

Why did they wait so long to tell their stories if he really did what they allege?

Tthe fact those women waited until a few months before the election to suddenly decide they needed justice is a bit convenient.

Of course, you'll probably claim that the "context" is different, or something.

 

[Phantasmal]

There aint a chance in the world that your kind would ever demand the withdrawal of Moore. Right kuntface?

Please don’t lower yourself to their level! Thanks

 

[Русский агент]

it's rank slander to over turn the will of the people

DEMOCRATS use the federal bench to achieve goals they cannot realize through legislation, don't they?

Seems like since 2000 they have questioned the validity of every presidential election except the ones they won.

Now, they commission salacious "dossiers" and use them as "evidence" to establish investigations etc...

I see a trend.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Just a side note on Bannon - every time I hear him speak, I realize that he thinks he's a voice for the majority of "unheard" Americans.

He's a loony fringe guy, and nothing more. An extremist who has nearly insane delusions of grandeur.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Did he say anything about what "These allegations..." are? Did he know the girl but not touch her? Did he take her to his apartment not his house? Did he never meet her at all? Did he only touch her left tit, not both?

Nobody can believe anything you say. You claimed Roy Moore didn't deny the allegations. Are you uninformed or a liar? It was in the WaPo article you are masturbating over.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Just a side note on Bannon - every time I hear him speak, I realize that he thinks he's a voice for the majority of "unheard" Americans.

He's a loony fringe guy, and nothing more. An extremist who has nearly insane delusions of grandeur.

well if you say so

I guess you think you speak for them?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

well if you say so

I guess you think you speak for them?

And where did I say that?

You're just stretching. Bannon is an extremist - that's what I'm saying. Can I call someone an extremist without speaking for the world?

 

[archives]

DEMOCRATS use the federal bench to achieve goals they cannot realize through legislation, don't they?

Seems like since 2000 they have questioned the validity of every presidential election except the ones they won.

Now, they commission salacious "dossiers" and use them as "evidence" to establish investigations etc...

I see a trend.

Not to interrupt, but that would only be three elections, and not many challenged the election of 2004.

What was "questioned" in the other two was the continuous relevance of the electoral college, and Republicans would never examine such since they never lost an election where they received the majority of votes

Just trying to help you out

 

[Jarod]

Nobody can believe anything you say. You claimed Roy Moore didn't deny the allegations. Are you uninformed or a liar? It was in the WaPo article you are masturbating over.

So he is denying he was a prosecutor in the 1970's? I mean, he denied the article and the article claimed that he was. Its all about the wording. He did not specifically deny the allegations, that speaks volumes to me.

The woman's story is solid.

 

[Русский агент]

Not to interrupt, but that would only be three elections, and not many challenged the election of 2004. What was "questioned" in the other two was the continuous relevance of the electoral college, and Republicans would never examine such since they never lost an election where they received the majority of votes Just trying to help you out

So you say, anchovies. Have you got any evidence to support your allegedly well-intentioned opinion?

I'll understand if you don't.

 

[Русский агент]

So he is denying he was a prosecutor in the 1970's? I mean, he denied the article and the article claimed that he was. Its all about the wording. He did not specifically deny the allegations, that speaks volumes to me. The woman's story is solid.

You seemed less certain of the guilt of another man accused of sexual improprieties, Brad.

Prove any of those women are survivors of Sexual Assault!

Those people are not survivors of Sexual Assault.

Did the accused in those cases specifically deny the allegations?

Did that speak volumes to you?

Were those women's story solid?

Be mindful of the fact that you will be requested to produce evidence to support any statement you make in these informal interrogatories, Brad.