Did dossier trigger the Trump-Russia probe?

[cancel2 2022]

You're either drunk or really stupid.

Your choice.

Neither Whingy, anyway Yurt is back so I'll hand you over to him.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

she ws lied about


you bought in to the lies

remember

I always thought the email scandal was overblown.

I didn't vote for her because she voted for the Iraq War, and because of how she was w/ women during her husband's scandals (mainly).

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Maybe I missed where Trump destroyed evidence and Mueller let it slide.

Got a link?

Ah, yes - you're back to "it has to be this exact circumstance."

You're really flailing. And gear up; this investigation isn't over yet.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Neither Whingy, anyway Yurt is back so I'll hand you over to him.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Well, at least that's a spot-on equivalency.

 

[Darth Omar]

I 100% addressed it. Your first goalpost was the media, which was easy to debunk, and why you moved it.

Sorry, Darthy. You lose again.

Maybe I missed where Trump destroyed evidence and Mueller let it slide.

Got a link?

 

[Darth Omar]

Ah, yes - you're back to "it has to be this exact circumstance."

You're really flailing. And gear up; this investigation isn't over yet.

Let me see if I have this straight.

Unless Trump is caught destroying evidence by Mueller, and gets away with it[!], there’s no proving a double standard.

I give up lol. But let’s try this route. Let’s suppose Trump does ‘exactly’ what Hillary did. Do you think he would get away with it like Hillary did?

Or let’s suppose Mueller gets Trump red-handed colluding with Putin on the election but exonerates him by playing words games with law.

If you can conceive Trump getting the same treatment as Hillary in either instance, you are beyond hope.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Let me see if I have this straight.

Unless Trump is caught destroying evidence by Mueller, and gets away with it[!], there’s no proving a double standard.

I give up lol. But let’s try this route. Let’s suppose Trump does ‘exactly’ what Hillary did. Do you think he would get away with it like Hillary did?

Or let’s suppose Mueller gets Trump red-handed colluding with Putin on the election but exonerates him by playing words games with law.

If you can conceive Trump getting the same treatment as Hillary in either instance, you are beyond hope.

Let's just get this reminder out there: your whole "double standard" thing started w/ the media. You bailed on that when you realized that the media covered Hillary's scandal ad nauseum.

As for your "legal" double standard (not media) - sorry if it's tough for you that different circumstances warrant different reactions from investigating authorities.

 

[Darth Omar]

Let's just get this reminder out there: your whole "double standard" thing started w/ the media. You bailed on that when you realized that the media covered Hillary's scandal ad nauseum.

As for your "legal" double standard (not media) - sorry if it's tough for you that different circumstances warrant different reactions from investigating authorities.

Didn’t like the question?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Didn’t like the question?

How about "sure."

Trump has gotten away with a ton - you just don't see it. You are immersed in the koolaid.

 

[Getin the ring]

Let me see if I have this straight.

Unless Trump is caught destroying evidence by Mueller, and gets away with it[!], there’s no proving a double standard.

I give up lol. But let’s try this route. Let’s suppose Trump does ‘exactly’ what Hillary did. Do you think he would get away with it like Hillary did?

Or let’s suppose Mueller gets Trump red-handed colluding with Putin on the election but exonerates him by playing words games with law.

If you can conceive Trump getting the same treatment as Hillary in either instance, you are beyond hope.

while we are on the subject ^^^

maybe after Ive asked the 15th time, what does Trump Russia collusion mean?
You would think since you and the loons are spending so much time, 10 months now that someone ANYONE would at least be able to define what that means.

((crickets))

 

[Getin the ring]

Let's just get this reminder out there: your whole "double standard" thing started w/ the media. You bailed on that when you realized that the media covered Hillary's scandal ad nauseum.

As for your "legal" double standard (not media) - sorry if it's tough for you that different circumstances warrant different reactions from investigating authorities.

Is that suppose to make sense
You're babbling, reduced to incoherent babbling means maybe you should just stfu

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Is that suppose to make sense
You're babbling, reduced to incoherent babbling means maybe you should just stfu

It had some big words and terms like "investigating authorities."

Sorry about that. I keep forgetting that this isn't the most well-read site.

 

[Getin the ring]

It had some big words and terms like "investigating authorities."

Sorry about that. I keep forgetting that this isn't the most well-read site.

oh good, the resident brain of the Loons..

So why don't you tackle what should be the easiest question ever asked being you have been emersed in it for 10 months

What does Russia / trump collusion even mean, just some little itty bitty attempt at defining, pleeeeease

 

[Darth Omar]

while we are on the subject ^^^

maybe after Ive asked the 15th time, what does Trump Russia collusion mean?
You would think since you and the loons are spending so much time, 10 months now that someone ANYONE would at least be able to define what that means.

((crickets))

I don’t know what it means, exactly lol.

But I’m not the one making the accusation.

 

[Getin the ring]

I don’t know what it means, exactly lol.

But I’m not the one making the accusation.

good answer

So how about one of you left loons, I mean come on it's all you and your congressional nit-wits have been talking about non-stop for ten months

What does Trump / Russia collusion mean, come on, pleeeaaseee
Don't run away Thingy, where did you go
((crickets))

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

good answer

So how about one of you left loons, I mean come on it's all you and your congressional nit-wits have been talking about non-stop for ten months

What does Trump / Russia collusion mean, come on, pleeeaaseee
Don't run away Thingy, where did you go
((crickets))

So dopey.

Search my posts. I have never said that there was collusion.

However, there is certainly enough "there" there to justify an investigation. And man, can you ever not stop whining about that one. Let it go - it's underway, there have been indictments, and there will probably be more.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Though, I actually did think Jr's meeting bordered on collusion. Not enough to really prosecute - but it was definitely in a pretty fuzzy area, and hardly a good look.

 

[Darth Omar]

Though, I actually did think Jr's meeting bordered on collusion. Not enough to really prosecute - but it was definitely in a pretty fuzzy area, and hardly a good look.

So, whatever collusion entails, Junior sucks at it lol?

Poor Assange couldn’t get Junior to collude either.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

So, whatever collusion entails, Junior sucks at it lol?

Poor Assange couldn’t get Junior to collude either.

You'd be screaming about it if it was Hillary (see: tarmac)

 

[Getin the ring]

So dopey.

Search my posts. I have never said that there was collusion.

However, there is certainly enough "there" there to justify an investigation. And man, can you ever not stop whining about that one. Let it go - it's underway, there have been indictments, and there will probably be more.

So that's it, the resident looney tune can't explain what ten months of resource and media babble is actually trying to prove with this "investigation

I love it