T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
That's his opinion, and like yours, he's entitled to it.Trump says she lied about working at McDonald's. He hasn't proved it.
Has he?
That's his opinion, and like yours, he's entitled to it.Trump says she lied about working at McDonald's. He hasn't proved it.
Has he?
That's his opinion, and like yours, he's entitled to it.
except she's lying and there's no w2.I don't know, but have no reason to doubt she spent summer vacation from college working at Micky D's.
This is a pretty good indication she's lying. She'd have had to had a W-2 related to that job and the employer would have withheld FICA, even back then.except she's lying and there's no w2.
yes.This is a pretty good indication she's lying. She'd have had to had a W-2 related to that job and the employer would have withheld FICA, even back then.
There's so much else about her that is 'plastic' and seemingly made up that I think the most likely version is she spouted this without thinking in answer to some reporter's question and is now stuck having to continue the lie or fess up to it, something she'd never do. We've all seen how she cannot, and will not, take blame for her errors, mistakes, or shortcomings.
This is a pretty good indication she's lying. She'd have had to had a W-2 related to that job and the employer would have withheld FICA, even back then.
Yep, sure that.That's your opinion, and like mine, you're entitled to it.
except she's lying and there's no w2.
Then let's see her W-2 entry with Social Security.Suspicion does not equal certainty, does it?
Do you have a W2 from over 40 years ago, Fredo? Do you have one from over 7 years ago? I don't.except she's lying and there's no w2.
Yep, sure that.
Let's see the W-2 entry though.
Prove it by posting it here. I looked on my SS page and only see earnings, not employer history.Then let's see her W-2 entry with Social Security.
Bet my first job with W T Grant is on there.
The IRS retains them since they have to keep track of how many quarters you paid in and the amount you paid to determine your eventual benefits on retirement and receiving payments.She's under no obligation to show it, is she?
You do know the IRS doesn't even require taxpayers to retain records that far back.
Don't you?
The IRS retains them since they have to keep track of how many quarters you paid in and the amount you paid to determine your eventual benefits on retirement and receiving payments.
I could get it if I was running for president.Do you have a W2 from over 40 years ago, Fredo? Do you have one from over 7 years ago? I don't.
I could get it if I was running for president. mcdonalds said they had not record of it.
so mcdonalds has no record of it.
so mcdonalds has no record of it.
exactly, she was never there.Why would they?