Did Russia seek to influence the 2016 elections. Yes!

Teflon Don said:
How is that relevant to what I just said?

can you ever answer anything without "whataboutism"?

Be better Veruca

BTW, why did Obama order the PDB to be changed when the original analysis was that Russia had no impact on the election? Maybe you haven't kept up with the story.

Whistleblowers are coming forward and telling the whole sordid tale. What you were told about Russian interference was one big fat lie and you fell for it hook line and sinker. You actually believed that Putin wanted Trump to win over Hillary.

Now, I understand that cognitive dissonance will prevent you from ever facing the truth. The pain of learning that your messiah B. Hussein Obama committed acts of treason and that you fell for his lies will be too great for you to overcome. That is why you will concoct stories that the evidence is made up or "doctored".

I can empathize with you Veruca. When it finally dawned on my that I was sold a bill of goods by the traditional Republican party and that they were nothing more than a lower extension of the democrat party growing government, making promises they never delivered on and spending like sailors on leave, I have to admit it rocked me a bit. But, I got through it. The truth has no agenda Veruca. It would serve you well to remember that.
Click to expand...
You seem to suggest that there is something wrong with pleading the fifth. That’s why I asked.
 
Teflon Don said:
How is that relevant to what I just said?

can you ever answer anything without "whataboutism"?

Be better Veruca

BTW, why did Obama order the PDB to be changed when the original analysis was that Russia had no impact on the election? Maybe you haven't kept up with the story.

Whistleblowers are coming forward and telling the whole sordid tale. What you were told about Russian interference was one big fat lie and you fell for it hook line and sinker. You actually believed that Putin wanted Trump to win over Hillary.

Now, I understand that cognitive dissonance will prevent you from ever facing the truth. The pain of learning that your messiah B. Hussein Obama committed acts of treason and that you fell for his lies will be too great for you to overcome. That is why you will concoct stories that the evidence is made up or "doctored".

I can empathize with you Veruca. When it finally dawned on my that I was sold a bill of goods by the traditional Republican party and that they were nothing more than a lower extension of the democrat party growing government, making promises they never delivered on and spending like sailors on leave, I have to admit it rocked me a bit. But, I got through it. The truth has no agenda Veruca. It would serve you well to remember that.
Click to expand...
I’ve seen no evidence Obama ordered anything to be changed. The Republican Senate committee found that the Russians lead a lead an interference operation regarding our elections.
 
Teflon Don said:
How is that relevant to what I just said?

can you ever answer anything without "whataboutism"?

Be better Veruca

BTW, why did Obama order the PDB to be changed when the original analysis was that Russia had no impact on the election? Maybe you haven't kept up with the story.

Whistleblowers are coming forward and telling the whole sordid tale. What you were told about Russian interference was one big fat lie and you fell for it hook line and sinker. You actually believed that Putin wanted Trump to win over Hillary.

Now, I understand that cognitive dissonance will prevent you from ever facing the truth. The pain of learning that your messiah B. Hussein Obama committed acts of treason and that you fell for his lies will be too great for you to overcome. That is why you will concoct stories that the evidence is made up or "doctored".

I can empathize with you Veruca. When it finally dawned on my that I was sold a bill of goods by the traditional Republican party and that they were nothing more than a lower extension of the democrat party growing government, making promises they never delivered on and spending like sailors on leave, I have to admit it rocked me a bit. But, I got through it. The truth has no agenda Veruca. It would serve you well to remember that.
Click to expand...
Conspiracy theorist nut!
 
Jarod said:
You seem to suggest that there is something wrong with pleading the fifth. That’s why I asked.
Click to expand...
While it is everyone's Constitutional right not to self incriminate themselves, we know what it means when someone answers that to every single question they get. But, that is OK if you want to play coy.

For you if a Republican does it, it equates guilt. If a democrat does it they are just exercising their rights. Right Veruca?
 
Jarod said:
I’ve seen no evidence Obama ordered anything to be changed. The Republican Senate committee found that the Russians lead a lead an interference operation regarding our elections.
Click to expand...
You won't see it if you refuse to read it. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And since you aren't the real arbiter, what you think matters very little doesn't it?

I suspect you have never see $1 billion but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist
 
Teflon Don said:
While it is everyone's Constitutional right not to self incriminate themselves, we know what it means when someone answers that to every single question they get. But, that is OK if you want to play coy.

For you if a Republican does it, it equates guilt. If a democrat does it they are just exercising their rights. Right Veruca?
Click to expand...
No, as attorney I understand a lot of reasons one taken their 5th privilege, I have often recommended my clients do so.
 
Teflon Don said:
You won't see it if you refuse to read it. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And since you aren't the real arbiter, what you think matters very little doesn't it?

I suspect you have never see $1 billion but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist
Click to expand...
I would read any evidence you produce. I have yet to see anything where he ordered this.
 
Jarod said:
“Yes — multiple investigations and intelligence assessments concluded that Russia actively sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Here’s a breakdown of what’s widely accepted:

🇷🇺 What Russia Did

• Cyberattacks: Russian military intelligence (GRU) hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Clinton campaign officials, and other political entities A B.
• Disinformation Campaigns: Troll farms like the Internet Research Agency created fake social media accounts to sow discord and promote divisive content A.
• Leaks: Stolen emails were released via platforms like WikiLeaks, timed to disrupt Clinton’s campaign A B.
• Targeting Election Infrastructure: Russian actors probed voter registration systems in multiple states, though no votes were altered A B.


🧠 Intelligence Community Conclusion

• The U.S. intelligence community, in a 2017 report, assessed with high confidence that President Vladimir Putin ordered the operation to undermine public faith in the democratic process, damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, and help Donald Trump C.
• A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in 2020 reaffirmed these findings, calling Russia’s efforts “extensive” and “sweeping” A.


🧾 Legal Fallout

• Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation led to indictments of 26 Russian nationals and 3 organizations for interference-related crimes A D.
• While Mueller found insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, he confirmed that the campaign welcomed and expected to benefit from Russia’s actions A.


If you want to explore how this shaped legal precedent or media law, I can pull up some case studies or court filings. Or we can unpack the latest DNI report that’s reignited this debate. Your call.”

Copilot AI
Click to expand...
Russia wanted to sow chaos in the election. In the end what little they did had zero effect on the 2016 election and Mueller said the Trump campaign did not collude with the Russians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top