Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
How do YOU PROVE your allegations?
DId the Maine shooter have the right to bear an AR-15?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
How do YOU PROVE your allegations?
Thats already a law, since its not working, should we repeal it?
Maine was guaranteed a republican form of government though. How is it that if citizens in other states get to overrule them on such important issues?
Id require a process to attain such a weapon that an insane person would be unable to accomplish.
The Constitution of the United States of America grants the Federal Government certain powers over the states. Maine was guaranteed a DEMOCRATIC Republic within those limits.
It would require psychological examination and in some cases would be difficult to prove.
sounds like you are throwing shit against the wall now
if you wanted a hand at honesty, you would admit that the civil war and any changes to the laws after were not done with the intent to change gun control rules in this country
sometime the shit stains become quite transparent when they refuse to be upfront
Are you saying that The Constitution of the United States of America does not grant the Federal Government certain powers over the states. And that Maine was not guaranteed a DEMOCRATIC Republic within those limits.
you can make your word DEMORATIC as large as you want, the constitution only guarantees Maine has a republican form of govenrment
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Actually, there are federal and State laws that limit rights when a person is determined by a legal authority, to be a danger to themselves or others.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
no. and we've had this roundabout debate before. So here we go again. 1. the right to arms includes any weapons that a standing army would/could use against the populace. 2. If you want to take that as 'not all arms', 'no ICBMs' means that the right is not absolute, then by all fucking means we should have ICBMs.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
denying what you're doing doesn't mean you're not, you still are.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
That speaks as to the quality of people and the segregation of crazy people from society.
So where does the Constitution say that the right is limited to those weapons a standing army would use against the populace? Do you not believe that giving widespread access to ICBM's would likely be the end of humanity?
That speaks as to the quality of people and the segregation of crazy people from society.
Agreed, we have a lot of crazy people free in our society, until we do something about it... we need to limit easy access to machines capable of easy mass murder.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Yep, the 9/11 hijackers fell thru the cracks.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
That's against the 2nd amendment. You don't like The Constitution, huh?
Good thing your dictatorial faggot ass is not in charge of a damn thing.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
So ban trucks, cars, and airplanes. What about household chemicals, propane tanks and fertilizer?
I believe when rights conflict, we are required to impose regulations to try to prevent the conflict. In this case, the right to liberty (freedom from being murdered at elementary school for example) is directly conflicting with the right of mentally ill people's right to bear arms.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
No.
We need to limit crazy homicidal peoples' access to society and weapons, fucktard.
And we did here in this country for a long, long time, until Big Pharma bribed our government to stop that in the 1980s, now they wander the streets looking for victims.
Big Pharma made billions, their promises were false, and society has degraded by a significant percentage because of that happening.