Did you see this?

Darla said:
Wait a minute, you don't know that. I left my very very well off fiance for someone who was actually poor. Now, maybe I am one of the few f'd up women (or men for all I know) who would do that, but it goes to show that you don't know that money was the reason. If the guy I left my fiance for was rich, you would say I would never have left if he wasn't. But in fact, I would have and did.
Click to expand...

$$$$$$$$$

That's what it all bout dawla!1
 
Darla said:
bullshit. Wait till the day comes that you are with someone, and very alone, and you will see what I mean.
Click to expand...

'Twas a joke, Darla. I thought the fact that I was talking in a ridiculous fashion would tip you off?


$$$$$$$$ - that wat it all BOUT, homedogs.
 
Socrtease said:
This is crap. We give businesses the right to sue for tortious interference with a contract if a third party comes in and disrupts a contractual relationship between other businesses. marriage is a contract no different than that but with more serious consequences when
a third party knowingly interfers. Shit people get killed over this sort of thing. And do you think she would have divorced him if she hadn't been involved with her MILLIONAIRE boss? Do you think the millionaire boss didn't say "Go ahead and leave him baby. I can take care of you." But her working for someone that makes less than her hubby did and she may have screwed him but she would have NEVER left her husband for him.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, I'm still not seeing the analogy between a marriage, and widget contracts.

If the millionaire asker her to marry him, it was her responsibility to say no. She's not anyone's property, and she has free will. The millionaire dude didn't make any pledges on an altar he is responsible for upholding. She did.

You guys are putting to much emphasis on money. I don't think there are that many people who leave their spouse simply for money. Very, very few. Not that it even matters anyway.
 
I don't think many people marry each other for the sole purpose of money, unless the hubby or wife's about to drop or something. Then again, money can be an incentive. And sometimes, maybe, it's a bit of a trap, so that you convince yourself can't get out of something bad.
 
Watermark said:
I'm just alone. I guess I'd rather be with someone and alone than alone. :dunno:

And I'd have MONEY.
Click to expand...

Sometimes being with someone and feeling lonely can be the loneliest feeling you'll ever have.

You're so young Water, you won't be alone forever, don't worry.
 
Cypress said:
I'm sorry, I'm still not seeing the analogy between a marriage, and widget contracts.

If the millionaire asker her to marry him, it was her responsibility to say no. She's not anyone's property, and she has free will. The millionaire dude didn't make any pledges on an altar he is responsible for upholding. She did.

You guys are putting to much emphasis on money. I don't think there are that many people who leave their spouse simply for money. Very, very few. Not that it even matters anyway.
Click to expand...

She's still a hussy.

But wouldn't it be great if a couple planned it out so that the wife would "leave" the husband for a rich guy, the husband would sue for affections, get a few million, and then the wife would divorce the guy and go back to the husband, so in the end they end up with 90% of his NW?
 
Watermark said:
I don't think many people marry each other for the sole purpose of money, unless the hubby or wife's about to drop or something. Then again, money can be an incentive. And sometimes, maybe, it's a bit of a trap, so that you convince yourself can't get out of something bad.
Click to expand...

I know plenty of people who are divorced, who cheated, and/or remarried. And it was never about someone's salary that killed the love. That's not the way it works.
 
Socrtease said:
Ok if I and party B are involved in a contract for a period of months or years for the supplying of widgets, and I have given party B a really good price for my widgets based on the length of the contract and the contract forsees the relationship as exclusive, and then party C comes along and offers widgets for even less over the same period KNOWING that Party B and I have an exclusive contract then I can sue Party B for breach and I can sue party C for Tortious interference so long as I can prove Party C knew of the contract between me and B. Same concept. She went somewhere else for her widgets and the Millionaire KNEW she had a contract for her husbands widgets. He interfered and should be held liable.
Click to expand...

Yet it is still party B that broke the contract. Friggin lawyers. Why not just extend the madness? Lets sue party D who knew party C was hooking up with B and also knew that party B was married to A yet did nothing to stop the breaking of the "contract". Then we can sue the lawyers for wasting everyones time with bullshit lawsuits.
 
uscitizen said:
Would be a lot less cheating if spouses were legally allowed to shoot the other half if caught cheating.
Click to expand...

I agree with that. :cool: J/K However, I think it interesting if the wifey tried to tell 'Johnnie' that 'oh wow, I'm pregnant!' As if it were his.
 
Thorn said:
Or --- don't cheat on your spouse and you'll be fine. Or --- if things are that bad in the marriage, get out of it and then have your affair. Of course sex can be very compelling to someone whose life is unhappy, but it seems in this instance the "wronged" husband (whether he is or not is beyond the scope of this thread; we don't have enough info) is going after the inappropriate person. His wife is not his property; presumably she is an adult and is capable of making adult decisions. One of those is to honor the vows of the marriage unless and until the marriage is in formal dissolution.
Click to expand...

Absolutely Thorn. Been married twice, never cheated on either wife. I know the first one did not do the same though....
 
Runyon said:
I agree with that. :cool: J/K However, I think it interesting if the wifey tried to tell 'Johnnie' that 'oh wow, I'm pregnant!' As if it were his.
Click to expand...

yeah I was mostly kidding too. Never seen why anyone should think an unfaithful spouse was worth killing someone over.
 
Last edited:
Darla said:
I agree with the first part of what you say here. But not everyone is capable of talking about it. Maybe she tried and he couldn't or wouldn't. Maybe he tried and she couldn't. Maybe he promised her a thousand times he'd stop gambling and broke her heart each time. Maybe she couldn't find the courage to get a divorce until she fell in love with someone else. I'm just not in the position to judge.
Click to expand...

Oh the old have to have one waiting in the wings thing....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top