Dixie, Step Up

Agnosticus_Caesar

Fuck You Too
Dixie, you are officially challenged. In an informal debate, support "Intelligent Design", as SOMEHOW being a product of Science.


Do as such without resorting to Logical Fallacy. I'd bet my last breath that you are incapable of doing as such.

Step up.
 
Oh damn, I am sorry, I have made a terrible error! I thought this was AssHatZombie... Damn stupid pinhead screen names! I can't keep them straight sometimes! I apologize, I was wrong, AC is not a jew hating racist, as far as I know.

I still have to decline his request though, I don't talk to God-hating authoritarian hypocrites either. Sorry!
 
Oh damn, I am sorry, I have made a terrible error! I thought this was AssHatZombie... Damn stupid pinhead screen names! I can't keep them straight sometimes! I apologize, I was wrong, AC is not a jew hating racist, as far as I know.

I still have to decline his request though, I don't talk to God-hating authoritarian hypocrites either. Sorry!

Translation: "I was caught using a lame excuse for avoiding this particular argument. Thus, I will defer to plan B and use an even more invalid and asinine personal attack to avoid further embarrassment."
 
Translation: "I was caught using a lame excuse for avoiding this particular argument. Thus, I will defer to plan B and use an even more invalid and asinine personal attack to avoid further embarrassment."

Translation after being filtered back through the Pinhead rhetoric articulator:
Oh damn, I am sorry, I have made a terrible error! I thought this was AssHatZombie... Damn stupid pinhead screen names! I can't keep them straight sometimes! I apologize, I was wrong, AC is not a jew hating racist, as far as I know.

I still have to decline his request though, I don't talk to God-hating authoritarian hypocrites either. Sorry!


Hmm... Imagine that? Just what I said to begin with!
 
Dixie, it is expected that you would lack the testicular fortitude to face me. One would, at the very lest, hope that you'd challenge me anywat.

I have to give you credit. You're, at the very least, smart enough to realize that you don't stand a chance. Try to find a less pathetic way to back down.
 
Perhaps Dixie's faith in Bush has failed him and he is too embareresed to admit it ? One can hope that he has "seen the light".
 
I don't talk to God-hating authoritarian hypocrites either. Sorry!

Ha ha ha! You don't want to support your ideas? How weak of you Dixie...
 
It's easy to take him down while he isn't here...

Wait 'til he comes back, then hack on him for his "fear".
 
Of course one must first believe in / prove the existance of a "creator" ie God for the ID argument to even begin.
 
Of course one must first believe in / prove the existance of a "creator" ie God for the ID argument to even begin.
You don't, however, have to believe in or prove it to present a logical argument that can actually work within the framework of common knowledge and scientific experience.

I've said it many times before. I think that it would be easier to believe as a scientist if one were looking at this thusly...

Science is the way to discover how the Creator did it all and the rules that apply to that Creation.
 
That is one possibliity Damo. Many seem to think sicience it out to prove that God does not exist. and have been for centuries, remember the great Renisance men.
 
I have no problem with belief. Also, those who seek to prove that there is no God are just as fuckwitted as those who seek to prove that there must be such a being.

Some see only rational, and irrational. I see another category.

I will point to the concepts of moral and immoral. There is a another category that finds its way into that sphere of conceptualization. AMORAL. The behavior of the wolf, when it brings down the crippled fawn, is neither moral nor immoral. It is AMORAL. It is a type of behavior divorced of the considerations of Moral vs. Immoral.

Likewise, I see another category when it comes to determining "that which is". There is not only rational and irrational. There is also ARATIONAL, or NONRATIONAL. Faith/Belief falls into this category, and it cannot be shown to be either necessarily false, or necessarily true.
 
Back
Top