Do conservatives even know what CRT is?
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Annetta might not know, but I clearly and decisively have demonstrated I know what it is, where it came from, and its intended purpose. It should be banned from K-12 entirely.
No such curriculum. Try again.
Same. Try again.
Teaching history? Oh my God!!!
ESMC, not CRT.
I even posted the California official curriculum in threads including the parts using CRT.
Washington Examiner is dismissed.
American History and Civics Education? OH MY GOD!
Nope you have not yet. Sorry.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Well, no you really didn't because you were asked several times where in Pedagogy of the Oppressed it says any of the things you said it does.
You couldn't cite that.
Instead, you relied on tortured, right-wing interpretations of language.
That's what you hung your hat on, and when confronted on it by other posters (like Poor Richard Saunders), you ran away from it. You couldn't even back up anything you were plagiarizing.
You had to lazily rely on right-wing Op-Eds to steer you to a preordained conclusion that you have, and those right-wing Op-Eds ended up biting you in the ass when it became clear that even YOU didn't read the links you were posting.
You don't even know what it is, and you agree with its principles!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Well, no you really didn't because you were asked several times where in Pedagogy of the Oppressed it says any of the things you said it does.
You couldn't cite that.
Instead, you relied on tortured, right-wing interpretations of language.
That's what you hung your hat on, and when confronted on it by other posters (like Poor Richard Saunders), you ran away from it. You couldn't even back up anything you were plagiarizing.
You had to lazily rely on right-wing Op-Eds to steer you to a preordained conclusion that you have, and those right-wing Op-Eds ended up biting you in the ass when it became clear that even YOU didn't read the links you were posting.
You don't even know what it is, and you agree with its principles!
Nice example of Poisoning the well and it still amounts to an ad hominem.
Please explain how this is ad hominem, because you throw that term around all the time as an escape hatch so you don't have to reconcile your bullshit.
So now you're going to have to.
So where in the below is the ad hominem attack you are complaining about?
I think you scream "ad hominem" as a way to avoid accountability for the horrendous shit you stupidly believe...now THAT is ad hominem.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
It is amazing to hear Teddy Cruz cry out and lie about it, as he knows exactly what it is- Because Critical Race Theory is an argument that Harvard Law School uses for their students to learn the art of Debate. They created this argument for that purpose! Critical Race Theory is the argument- "Does Systemic Racism exist in America"?
So to hear him stand up and say that this theory is Real and is Taught in High School is BAT-SHIT-CRAZY! It is simply a Theory that is easy debate material because everyone has an opinion on that and can provide reasons why they believe sustemic racism exists- or don't exist in America through out our history as a Free Nation.
So how do you teach students an argument? YOU DON'T! YOU TEACH THEM THE ART TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN BELIEFS THROUGH DEBATE!
NOW IF HIGH SCHOOLS USE THIS ARGUMENT FOR THEIR OWN STUDENTS IN DRAMA CLASSES- OR HISTORY CLASS- OR GOVERNMENT CLASSES! GREAT?
Or, perhaps a student may want to choose the Theory as a "Theme" for their TERM Paper" in High School English classes!
WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH THAT?
I "AXE" YOU! LOL!
Last edited:
BartenderElite
Verified User
If that's an ad hom, every post on the board is an ad hom.
So you would prefer if students never learned about the Tulsa Massacre?
cawacko
Well-known member
There has to be an example you can show of it being an actual class. CRT is a set of ideas about how racism is intertwined in our history and daily lives. Just like the 1619 Project or 1776 Project it's about how we want to tell our story as a country; hence why it draws so much attention and passion.
And CRT has different meanings to people in academia who study or push it. So because there's an element of abstractness to it it can be interpreted in different ways.
Dalton is the #6 ranked private school in the state of New York. It's been a massive feeder school to the Ivy's and other elite Universities for decades. If I'm hearing on the West Coast all that's happening at that school over the past year then I know you must know about it living there.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
You attacked me rather than address what I posted. That is the epitome of what ad hominem is.
https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Ad-Hominem.html
For someone who routinely calls people names on JPP, your cries of "ad hominem" ring really fucking hollow today.
Try a different tactic.
It's for educators, really. It can be used as a framework.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
No, it could be included in US history as a minor event in the overall teaching of the subject. But CRT goes further in that it conflates this event into a lesson about current supposed systemic racism and paints all Whites as oppressors and all Blacks as oppressed today even as the two are not linked by any evidence.
How did attack you?
Here's what I wrote that you said was an attack. How is it an attack?
So what about the question "So what is your problem?" is an attack on you?
So what about the question "That kids are taught the racist history of the country?" is an attack on you?
So what about the question "Would you prefer if they were taught a sanitized, feel-good version of history instead?" is an attack on you?
So what about the question "Don't you think that is more damaging than just telling the truth?" is an attack on you?
You weren't attacked at all.
So stop your bitching, crybaby, and deal with what you say you believe!
You're so sensitive, snowflake.
A minor event?
An entire town was wiped off the face of the Earth and dozens of innocent people were killed.
So...in your mind, those white people just decided out of the blue to go and burn down Black Wall Street just for the hell of it?
Why?
So this is the part where you have to prove this using text from CRT, not right-wing Op-Eds that deliberately misinterpret what was written.
Where in Pedagogy of the Oppressed does it say all whites are oppressors?
Where does it even allude to that?