Ok? Also, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Dogs love to chase balls. Murder is bad.
Do conservatives really care about Kirk, or his message?
- Thread starter BartenderElite
- Start date
not what you claimed. You claimed we're lying about what Kirk said. I accept your apology, trumptard!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I'm pointing out that Charlie wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed.
Well, he was smart enough to have a literal "hotline" to the office of the leader of the free world. What trump and Kirk do well is harness people's hatred and fear - they use it to power grab. As we've seen over the past almost decade - it works!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
That takes more celebrity than ability. That has always been the case regardless of who is in power.
Well, then Kirk was smart enough to achieve celebrity. He was responsible enough to make sure his family lives comfortably. Other than that he was a racist, misogynistic prick and I disagree with everything he stood for!
Charlie Kirk’s net worth at the time of his death: Conservative activist left his family with a sizeable fortune
The 31-year-old had a wife and two young children.
www.pennlive.com
"Citing multiple reports, Parade Magazine said that Kirk was estimated to be worth $12 million. Celebrity Net Worth also estimated Kirk’s net worth to be $12 million while noting that he also wrote several books, and that his career in conservative politics and media began all the way back in 2012 when he was just 18 years old."
I mean, he was a very prolific demigod.
I disagree,
I think Charlie was a good person. He worked HARD to make America a better place. His loss will be felt for a long time. What impresses me is how many on the Right on Fox, News Max and in politics counted him as their friend. I have heard many touching stories about him. The thing that angers me most about his death is his two children will grow up without any direct memory of him. How someone could steal the father of two small children is beyond me. Only an evil person would do that. Or maybe a sick person. And no I don't think they are using Charlie's death. You see we on the Right knew all along what you are only now just learning. Charlie was a decent guy. I get a sense that they are hurt and saddened and some want revenge. I hope they calm down and realize executing Robinson won't bring Charlie back. The best thing to do is to try to honor him by continuing his work. Robinson can slowly rot away in his cell for the next 60-70 years.
volsrocks
Verified User
He didn't state I want to or we should Stone gays
He stated its in the Bible and it is
It also says TURN THE OTHER CHEEK if someone says it does, does not mean he wants to not punish someone for doing bad things etc
https://www.google.com/search?sca_e...-IQbtDhQerBGIXx8ybYpTEPB6kED6M3Jt5fksU&csui=3
You've lost this one. Yes, he was quoting the bible, but he was advocating for what it said. It's the same thing, dumb dumb.
volsrocks
Verified User
So if someone states the Bible says turn the other cheek,,,that means they didn't want criminals charged ?
No, Truth, truth, truth!
Stephen King was right: Charlie Kirk said stoning gays was 'God's perfect law'
Celebrated novelist Stephen King has issued an apology for his comments following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, despite accurately representing the right-wing activist's violent rhetoric against LGBTQ+ people.www.yahoo.com
"In 2024, reacting to a video from YouTuber Ms. Rachel, in which she talks about the importance of "love thy neighbor" in the Bible, Kirk paraphrased a passage from Leviticus that advocates for stoning gay people, calling it "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters."
"By the way, Ms. Rachel, you might wanna crack open that Bible of yours," he said to camera. "In a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is…in Leviticus 18 is that, 'thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death.' Just sayin'."
I accept your apology for your ignorance.
You are reading a highly edited version...JUST SAYIN
Even Stephen King soon realized he had misjudged Kirk.
Stephen King apologizes, deletes X post claiming Charlie Kirk advocated 'stoning gays to death'
What the fuck does that have to do with what Kirk said?
Now, I know this is hard for you - but do try to follow along - it was discovered AFTER King apologized for his "incorrect" X post that he was actually correct. That Kirk actually did quote the bible, advocating for the stoning of gay people. I read the quote. I'd ask you to do it but it would involve the truth and I understand you're allergic.
I know this is very hard for you buy LINK???
"I apologize for saying Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gays. What he actually demonstrated was how some people cherry-pick Biblical passages," he wrote.
Pretty much what everyone here has been telling you.
"No!". That's the same thing you said to trump when he asked you if it was in too deep!
<shrug> it's in the OP article. Thus the theme, "King was right"?
Reading is hard for you.
Stephen King was right: Charlie Kirk said stoning gays was 'God's perfect law'
Celebrated novelist Stephen King has issued an apology for his comments following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, despite accurately representing the right-wing activist's violent rhetoric against LGBTQ+ people.
"Stephen King was right: Charlie Kirk said stoning gays was 'God's perfect law'
""By the way, Ms. Rachel, you might wanna crack open that Bible of yours," he said to camera. "In a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is…in Leviticus 18 is that, 'thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death.' Just sayin'."
You lose again, SlowPain. You should be used to it by now.
A Text out of context is pretext for error. Kirk was pointing out not to cherry pick a single text. Like Ms. Rachel was doing. If you take a single verse out of context and do not compare it to the rest of the scriptures you come up with the wrong exegesis. Kirk was admonishing her that Cherry picking is bad.