ZenMode
Well-known member
'no' would be a better response.
Sorry, I'm apparently out of practice in responding to insane questions.
No and I'm scared to ask how in the hell you would even think to ask the question.
'no' would be a better response.
Sorry, I'm apparently out of practice in responding to insane questions.
No and I'm scared to ask how in the hell you would even think to ask the question.
not sure what you are referring to.....I've never left any voting concerns....Ok, we've gone from mail-in ballots concerns, to in-person voting concerns in the last post, and now back to mail-in voting concerns.
ID and signature are verified when you register to vote and your signature is verified when you mail-in your ballot. Mismatched signatures are verified with the voter or the ballot is discarded if the voter can't be reached.
However, as I asked in a previous post can you explain the logistics of using mail-in ballots fraudulently?
So, how often do you realistically see the stars aligning to make that happen?
Right..... I mean, none of the fraudulent ballots were found in any audit
it's a question gauged to ascertain your attitude to people who don't believe your lies.
That's not how it works. The fact that I expose you to information you don't like and don't want to believe, doesn't make me a liar .
Maybe you should take those liberal blinders off. Then you might see for yourself.
were any full audits, including signature verification even held?.....AZ was the only state that did even a partial audit (and even there it wasn't done by the state)...and don't point to states that did a recount and pretend it was an audit.......
Ok. I may have misunderstood.not sure what you are referring to.....I've never left any voting concerns....
obviously irrelevant if no one bothers to look.....
I think I've made it clear......you just keep ignoring it......all it takes is a handful of people such as yourself ignoring the irregularities.....
every fucking election.....
THat is how my question works.
i was asking you about your attitude towards people who disagree with your conclusions.
that's a fair question.
These fuckos do not want secure elections.
We have secure elections. States from coast to coast use mail-in ballots and drop boxes with no meaningful amount of fraud. I mean, an entire movie was dedicated to exposing ballot harvesting and, despite having 4 MILLION minutes of video at dropboxes, they could produce ONE person who went to a dropbox more than once.
How many election deniers, to your knowledge, have been killed for disagreeing with others conclusions about the election?
historically.
but in 2020 dems made a full court press to exploit these loopholes bigly.
they admit it in the time article.
3,116 so far. but thats a guesstimate.
Sorry, but that don't look like proof to me.
Try again- after taking off your TRUMPTARDED BLINDERS!
exposing us to lies accomplishes that.....so far I haven't seen any facts from you......only denials.....That's not how it works. The fact that I expose you to information you don't like and don't want to believe, doesn't make me a liar .
Other than AZ, I don't believe any full audits done. Apparently states don't like to waste an incredible amount of resources based on lies spread by the President, his lawyers and internet trolls. Who knew?
What makes you believe that no one was looking and how would that directly translate into fraudulent ballots?