Some fail to understand the danger of bankrupting the country.
Do you think many on the right even understand what the Founding Fathers did?
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Some fail to understand the danger of bankrupting the country.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Not with you asshole- For you especially, even if your hair was on fire, I wouldn't bother to even piss on your head!
They support the WW2 ideas of Germany. Nationalism, superior race, power of the Corporation/State combination.
How do you bankrupt the country by raising revenues, Flash?
Jesus you're so fucking dumb sometimes....
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Taxes do not generate wealth. Ask Greece about that...
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
we still need a state, yes, specifically to counter the internationalist fascism you seem to prefer.
a bezos/ gates/soros army providing world security isn't necessarily preferable.
some traditions are good ideas. those should be kept.
anarcho-capitalism is quite gay.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
if corporations were governments they would be dictatorships.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
the only naziism I see is vaccine mandaters wanting to round up the unvaxxed.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you keep saying that. it's a lie every time.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you know, this is also applicable to dodgy ceos who justify bad behavior with their obligation to produce profits.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you can't take the heat.
I never said they did.
Maybe we should ask the ECB about the loans they gave to Greece that required austerity only to see the Greek economy fall further into depression after the cuts.
Because Greece doesn't control its currency, it couldn't print more money and keep interest rates low to keep the economy moving...it had to turn to the ECB who lent to Greece but had counter-productive austerity cuts tied to it.
Austerity made the Greek economy even worse....so it is a lesson, but it's a lesson YOU should learn about the pitfalls and dangers of arbitrary austerity.
OK weirdo.
Well, it's a good thing I am not calling for that.
Like what?
Tradition is just peer pressure from dead people.
Who gives a shit about dead people and their traditions? Not this guy.
Anarcho-capitalism is a paradox.
Police don't prevent crime, they investigate crimes that have already happened.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
...which is a deterrent to future crime.
OK, so then there haven't been any murders, robberies, rapes, etc.?
That's weird because you were just saying a couple posts ago how there's a crime wave!
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you people are increasingly just retarded nonsensical imbeciles.
Don't you think if a suit against the Federal Government involving itself in public education could be mounted on the claim it is Unconstitutional it would have happened by now?
Last edited:
You: Cops prevent crime.
Me: No they don't.
You: Yes they do.
Me: Well, then how come we're in the middle of a "crime wave"?
You: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It is a question laced in irony coming from a dishonest leftist hack who thought that the burning and looting conducted by BLM protestors was mostly peaceful.
I still haven't seen a coherent response for how this could be called treason or an insurrection. But that is the divisive, stupid rhetoric the left is willing to bloviate in a desperate bid to consolidate autocratic political power.
The right to petition our government is definitely in the Constitution. Isn't it called the "People's house?" Don't they "represent" all of us?
The protestors, for the most part, were rightfully protesting their views. Until the police started treating them like terrorists, it was, for all intents and purposes, peaceful and a patriotic act. The only people killed that day were UNARMED protestors.
So that brings us to the question, why is it that the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses are trying to make this into something way bigger than that? To prevent Democracy? To consolidate power? To shut down the free speech rights of those they disagree with?
I think we know why this fairly trivial event is still being dragged through the media mud. It's more of their Fascistic desire to define their opponents in dishonest ways to trivialize their rights.
