Do you think they have much on Comey?

Earl said:
I will repeat…”at the right hand of God," signifying a position of highest honor and power. For people, it signifies their actions, responsibilities, and the things they hold sacred or most important.

This is where I believe Trump now resides.
Click to expand...
So you won’t answer the question, understood?
 
Damocles said:
New Mexico is no swing state. Let's say they were in Texas, do you think it would matter? I don't really know. I'd have to hear all the evidence though. If it were a real swing state, half the jury would be democrats and I have had no evidence that there are more than 3% of y'all that are willing to set aside that blue jersey before making a decision.
Click to expand...
Do you understand that Bill Barr said that there was not enough to evidence to convict Comey and refused?

Two republican prosecutors at DOJ refused for the same reason.
 
Perhaps there is now additional evidence to convict the person who kept Hillary from the presidency.

Talk about conflicted, defending this man who personally kept their heroine from the presidency.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Do you understand that Bill Barr said that there was not enough to evidence to convict Comey and refused?

Two republican prosecutors at DOJ refused for the same reason.
Click to expand...
Isn't one of the two related to Comey?

I want the link on your Barr claim - all I can find is what he said about going after Biden:

“the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."
 
zymurgy said:
Isn't one of the two related to Comey?

I want the link on your Barr claim - all I can find is what he said about going after Biden:

“the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."
Click to expand...
I do not believe one is related to Comey.

Barr’s story is in his book.
 
zymurgy said:
Isn't one of the two related to Comey?

I want the link on your Barr claim - all I can find is what he said about going after Biden:

“the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."
Click to expand...
”the evidence showed Comey lacked criminal intent. No one thought that the prosecution could be justified.”

www.independent.org

William Barr’s Book Reveals More Than It Shows: News Article - Independent Institute

www.independent.org www.independent.org
 
Jarod said:
”the evidence showed Comey lacked criminal intent. No one thought that the prosecution could be justified.”

www.independent.org

William Barr’s Book Reveals More Than It Shows: News Article - Independent Institute

www.independent.org www.independent.org
Click to expand...
Thank you for your quote about evidence in 2022. So no new evidence after 2022?

abcnews.go.com

Friend of former FBI Director James Comey subpoenaed in federal probe: Sources

A friend of ex-FBI Director James Comey was subpoenaed last week in connection with a probe into whether Comey allegedly lied in testimony before Congress, sources say.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
 
Earl said:
Perhaps there is now additional evidence to convict the person who kept Hillary from the presidency.

Talk about conflicted, defending this man who personally kept their heroine from the presidency.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you're still not getting the concept here.

You see everything through a partisan lens. Some things are much more about principle.
 
Earl said:
The Feds won’t release it to me.

Why do you think a Grand Jury indicted him? They saw the evidence.
Click to expand...
Too get a grand jury indictment the Prosecutors can present as much or as little as they want and they usually only present what they think would convince a GJ.

In this case the best way to get an indictment from a GJ who does not know the case facts is simply to present McCabes statements saying 'Comey knew and authorized it' without presenting any countering material.

Of course, based on that alone, if you are saying you want to indict for lying to Congress a GJ would say yes as they are not seeing the information that destroys that statement by McCabe as a point of evidence worth anything.
 
Jarod said:
I do not know if he is one of the ones who refused to prosecute Comey.
Click to expand...
only two people refused and quit - one was a relative (they both would be fired for refusing)

now you know. So a family member quitting - you think maybe that is a part of your debate that is weak and you should drop?

Now how about a quote from a guy in 2022 that would have no idea about new evidence in the last 12 months? Maybe his quote isn't so powerful either?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top