The interesting part of the indictment is that it does not contain an actual quote that it claims is a lie. It is a "general indictment", which makes it defective. So how do you think Comey lied about the Steele Dossier? Remember, we need an exact quote.
If they did, they would have an exact quote to indict him with...
A trial of him alone will have people turning on each other? Does Comey have multiple personalities?
Or considerably more when he sues the DOJ for false prosecution.
trump ordered her firing, because he hated her father. She is now suing the DOJ over her firing.
Comey twice denied authorizing a leak from someone "at the FBI." According to McCabe, Comey knew about his leak after the fact, which is different from authorizing it. Richman was an outside consultant, so not technically at the FBI. Given that Comey admitted to having Richman release documents in the same testimony that he denied having someone "at the FBI" release documents shows that he considered Richman not to be at the FBI.
So your claims really fall apart. They might be able to find something against Comey in his testimony about Clinton. But, then you would have a trial for the better part of a year about how Comey cheated to get trump elected in the first place... Not what trump wants.
No, you have one witness that Comey leaked to the press. Richman, his friend from law school, says that Comey gave him documents to release to the press. You know who else says that? Comey. So it is not lying to Congress.
In the USA, it is impossible to be charged with a felony without first being indicted by a grand jury. So everyone associated with trump charged with a felony was indicted by a grand jury first.
Based on the win rate for federal prosecutors who refused to take this case, because it was a certain loser?
Or will win a huge wrongful prosecution verdict, and walk away very rich?
They cannot find a crime covering the leaking, so that is not part of the crime. Lying to Congress is a crime. There is no one who has publicly provided any evidence of Comey lying. Maybe there is some secret evidence, but...
The indictment needed to involve a specific crime, which in this case would have meant a specific quote. That no one is able to give a specific quote means that the indictment may well be voided as defective. Given that the statute of limitations has run out, there will be no more indictments on the subject.
So Comey testified to Congress he released the document through Richman... To prove a lie, you would have to prove he did not do that. Remember, you are trying to prove that Comey lied to Congress, not that he had Richman release the document.
Violating a policy gets someone fired... Not prosecuted. You need to prove a crime to get Comey sent to prison, not a violation of policy.
No she was not. A much older lawyer at her same level said he wanted to fire her for not doing his job for him, but he did not have authority to do such. She was well recommended by the lead Watergate council, and was not fired.
EXACTLY!!! There needs to be a specific quote to begin with.
What is your evidence that is a lie?
If that were a crime, you would have a case... The crime accused here is lying to Congress, so you need to prove Comey lied when he said he released the file through his friend.
Baker was never at the FBI, so that would not prove lying to Congress. Remember that you are trying to prove that Comey lied to Congress about not leaking through people at the FBI.
And yet you cannot find any evidence?
