DoD says best equipment not allowed

http://m.military.com/daily-news/2012/05/25/in-reversal-army-bans-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?E
SRC=dod.nl

The Army has ordered that soldiers may use only government-issued magazines with their M4 carbines, a move that effectively bans one of the most dependable and widely used commercial-made magazines on today’s battlefield.
The past decade of war has spawned a wave of innovation in the commercial soldier weapons and equipment market. As a result, trigger-pullers in the Army, Marines and various service special operations communities now go to war armed with commercially designed kit that’s been tested under the most extreme combat conditions.
Near the top of such advancements is the PMAG polymer M4 magazine, introduced by Magpul Industries Corp. in 2007. Its rugged design has made it as one of the top performers in the small-arms accessory arena, according to combat veterans who credit the PMAG with drastically improving the reliability of the M4.
Despite the success of the PMAG, Army officials from the TACOM Life Cycle Management Command issued a “safety of use message” in April that placed it, and all other polymer magazines, on an unauthorized list.
The message did not single out PMAGs, but instead authorizes only the use of Army-issued aluminum magazines. The message offers little explanation for the new policy except to state that “Units are only authorized to use the Army-authorized magazines listed in the technical manuals.” Nor does it say what Army units should now do with the millions of dollars’ worth of PMAGs they’ve purchased over the years.

For those who are unfamilar, the magazine (or clip to you proles) is single most likely to fail part of US military weapons, and the biggest cause for jamming across the board. That the DoD says our troops should use inferior equipment is...well I'm just baffled at the motivation.
 
http://m.military.com/daily-news/2012/05/25/in-reversal-army-bans-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?E
SRC=dod.nl



For those who are unfamilar, the magazine (or clip to you proles) is single most likely to fail part of US military weapons, and the biggest cause for jamming across the board. That the DoD says our troops should use inferior equipment is...well I'm just baffled at the motivation.

It is ridiculous, thanks for bringing to my attention. If you put our soldiers in harms way, they should have the best that is available.
 
Government likes cheap shit. Unless it involves a fighter, ship, and their payloads, then the DoD does all its shopping at thrift stores.
 
Government likes cheap shit. Unless it involves a fighter, ship, and their payloads, then the DoD does all its shopping at thrift stores.

Except PMAGs are cheap. The price per unit for me (a non bulk buyer) is $13. The price for a USED USGI mag is $10. And the rising cost of aluminum isn't going to make the current issue mags cheaper.
 
http://m.military.com/daily-news/2012/05/25/in-reversal-army-bans-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?E
SRC=dod.nl



For those who are unfamilar, the magazine (or clip to you proles) is single most likely to fail part of US military weapons, and the biggest cause for jamming across the board. That the DoD says our troops should use inferior equipment is...well I'm just baffled at the motivation.

I could perhaps understand it if the Army were using the best available equipment. That said, why isn't the best available equipment not standard?
 
what is the difference between a magazine and a clip?

:D

clip_magazine.jpg
 
Umm well then the "private contractors" were using the new Keel hulled persomnnel carriers while the US troops were using Humvees and other less protective vehicles.

You forgot this?

I didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, because all the armor on my humvees lowered the top speed to around 20mph, so we were pretty damn protected. Of course we weren't in M3s or anything but that's because our mission didn't require that.
 
I could perhaps understand it if the Army were using the best available equipment. That said, why isn't the best available equipment not standard?

The only rationale I could think of is because Magpull isn't a big contractor for the government. They're just a regular private company. But they also have a fuck ton of experience fixing shitty government magazine design.
 
I didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, because all the armor on my humvees lowered the top speed to around 20mph, so we were pretty damn protected. Of course we weren't in M3s or anything but that's because our mission didn't require that.

I recall troops complaining about the Humvees not being as well protected against IED's as the vehicles the private contractors were driving.
 
I recall troops complaining about the Humvees not being as well protected against IED's as the vehicles the private contractors were driving.

Maybe before my time, but since contractors don't have to go through to approval/confirmation procurement process that the government does, it's not an apt comparison in the first place.
 
So the Pentagon never said that troops couldn't have the best, laws and regulations require units to purchase supplies according to them.
 
Back
Top