Does anyone else notice that the LGBT's lie about inclusiveness

David Jeffrey Spetch

David Jeffrey Spetch

Verified User
Does anyone else notice that the LGBT's lie about inclusiveness

doesn't even include what it means to be male (which describes anyone born with a penis genital) and doesn't include what it means to be female (which describes anyone born with a vagina genital)?!! Sick of their disgusting, offensive and infuriating low life scum bag lies yet?

LGBTs-lie-about-inclusiveness.jpg


love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
 
David.
I'm guessing Hamiton has a Pot Store, and you have just returned from there.
You seem, well, overly concerned about this.
Are you waiting for the LGBT Community to tell you that you are Male?
You've posted this before.
 
Poor crazy right-wing bigotted Canadian. If the LGBTQ gets equal rights that would make the total of those with equal rights larger. That is by math and logic more inclusiveness. Stop and think before posting crazy bigotry for all to see.
 
Apparently, JK Rowling doesn't find certain transgender rhetoric to be inclusive. Not surprisingly, she's being ostracized for just defending the notion that the mere declaration of identifying as a woman doesn't make you a woman, if you have a male body.

Making what would seem to be an obviously true statement is enough to get you fired from a charity for women's safety as well.
 
David Jeffrey Spetch said:
Does anyone else notice that the LGBT's lie about inclusiveness

doesn't even include what it means to be male (which describes anyone born with a penis genital) and doesn't include what it means to be female (which describes anyone born with a vagina genital)?!! Sick of their disgusting, offensive and infuriating low life scum bag lies yet?

LGBTs-lie-about-inclusiveness.jpg


love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
Click to expand...


you will be in a much better place when you finally come out
 
Jack said:
David.
I'm guessing Hamiton has a Pot Store, and you have just returned from there.
You seem, well, overly concerned about this.
Are you waiting for the LGBT Community to tell you that you are Male?
You've posted this before.
Click to expand...

Not overly concerned until the sick rubbish is eliminated for the well being and sanity of current and future generations. You clam I posted this before ... link? bs Jack, you should be so lucky.
 
Nordberg said:
Poor crazy right-wing bigotted Canadian. If the LGBTQ gets equal rights that would make the total of those with equal rights larger. That is by math and logic more inclusiveness. Stop and think before posting crazy bigotry for all to see.
Click to expand...

You see how the real sickly bigots try and slander anyone else with what these sickos prove to be (bigots) to try and hide these extremely repulsive sickos have no validity, just more slanderous lies to try and drag everyone ls down to their sick and filthy disgusting low life scum bag level.

such-simple-facts.jpg
 
Woko Haram said:
Apparently, JK Rowling doesn't find certain transgender rhetoric to be inclusive. Not surprisingly, she's being ostracized for just defending the notion that the mere declaration of identifying as a woman doesn't make you a woman, if you have a male body.

Making what would seem to be an obviously true statement is enough to get you fired from a charity for women's safety as well.
Click to expand...

The sickos are insane compulsive obsessive lying trash.

Leftist-science.jpg


00000000-If-the-left-claims-to-be-anti-fascist.png


The-LGBT-abuse-society-101.jpg
 
David Jeffrey Spetch said:
Not overly concerned until the sick rubbish is eliminated for the well being and sanity of current and future generations. You clam I posted this before ... link? bs Jack, you should be so lucky.
Click to expand...

1. They talked about 'gays' in the Bible.
2. They felt the same way as you (kill them).
3. It's not apparent that 'gays' are producing MORE 'gays'.
4. It seems 'gays' are produced by some genetic mutation while in the womb.
5. Some females are born 'male', and vice versa.
6. So ... why persecute them for something they can't help, hide, or control?
3.
 
Jack said:
David.
I'm guessing Hamiton has a Pot Store, and you have just returned from there.
You seem, well, overly concerned about this.
Are you waiting for the LGBT Community to tell you that you are Male?
You've posted this before.
Click to expand...
He's back today. I can only speculate that he notices special urges whenever he sees male underwear ads, and he's getting a little nervous.

You know...like the Republican legislators who always vote against gay rights, but find themselves right back in airport bathrooms.
 
Woko Haram said:
Apparently, JK Rowling doesn't find certain transgender rhetoric to be inclusive. Not surprisingly, she's being ostracized for just defending the notion that the mere declaration of identifying as a woman doesn't make you a woman, if you have a male body.

Making what would seem to be an obviously true statement is enough to get you fired from a charity for women's safety as well.
Click to expand...

 
Woko Haram said:
He speaks eloquently, although he's still wrong.

No amount of philosophical sophistry will change genetic realities.
Click to expand...

Well the genetic realities do show that trans people have the brain structure of the gender they identify as, but that's not what he's arguing. He's showing how the argument of "I'm not transphobic, but something something genetics" actually is transphobic.
 
StoneByStone said:
Well the genetic realities do show that trans people have the brain structure of the gender they identify as, but that's not what he's arguing. He's showing how the argument of "I'm not transphobic, but something something genetics" actually is transphobic.
Click to expand...

When it comes to brain activity, that's where things get very interesting. I'm familiar with the argument that trans women and trans men exhibit brain activity that is supposedly associated with the gender they identify with. What makes this argument interesting is that it contradicts the idea that gender is socially constructed. For many years, feminists claimed that it is a social construct, but if we are to believe that one can identify someone's gender by brain activity, that clearly means that gender is at least partially biological.

Strangely, much of the same left that pushes this argument is often reluctant to notice physiological differences between men and women. Biological males have several advantages over women in most sports, due to higher potentials for strength and speed, and they have denser bone structures as well. This is why allowing biological males to compete against biological females isn't fair -- particularly when looking at things like MMA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top