Does anyone support getting 'Opposition Info' from Russia, China, Israel, Saudi, ...

Well what Trump did is ok because he has the Magic R.

Trump didn't do or say anything wrong.
Someone calls. You listen to what they have to say and determine if it's a joke or credible and proceed accordingly.
Heck, Pencil Neck did that as well.
Hillary on the other hand went after it, paid for it, traitor McCain went and retrieved it and it was UNVERIFIED AND FAKE yet was used to obtain FISA's! :palm:
 
Trump didn't do or say anything wrong.
Someone calls. You listen to what they have to say and determine if it's a joke or credible and proceed accordingly.

Trump said he wouldn't call the FBI. So basically, he's telling Russia that if they collude with him directly, he will not call the FBI, there will be no repercussions.
 
Trump said he wouldn't call the FBI. So basically, he's telling Russia that if they collude with him directly, he will not call the FBI, there will be no repercussions.

You're so deceived and confused in your little conspiratorial mind. He said he'd contact the FBI if it was warranted.
 
Trump didn't do or say anything wrong.
Someone calls. You listen to what they have to say and determine if it's a joke or credible and proceed accordingly.
Heck, Pencil Neck did that as well.
Hillary on the other hand went after it, paid for it, traitor McCain went and retrieved it and it was UNVERIFIED AND FAKE yet was used to obtain FISA's! :palm:

Liar
 
Well what Trump did is ok because he has the Magic R.

Trump didn't do anything you goof. It was a HYPOTHETICAL question with a HYPOTHETICAL answer. I wish liberals had brains; really I do.

Why is what Trump said unacceptable? How is what Hillary and her campaign did acceptable?
 
Here you go!

The Act and Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;

Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party (including donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);

Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;

Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.

Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to an FEC enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or both.

I don't see "getting information on the opposition candidate" anywhere in there snowflake. Obviously you can't read or comprehend the written laws of our land. FAIL again. You never get anything right do you?
 
Wow! Where to begin. OK!

There are key differences between the infamous dossier and the hypothetical situation Trump was asked about by ABC's George Stephanopoulos.

Yes there was; in ONE case, the Hillary campaign FUNDED and PAID for foreign nationals to create a FAKE salacious dossier intended to destroy an opposition campaign; which was then USED by the FBI within the Obama Presidency to SPY on and IMPUGN the Trump campaign, which was met with silence from the shrill dunces on the left and FAKE media.

In the OTHER case; you have a HYPOTHETICAL question and a HYPOTHETICAL answer which cause the morons in the FAKE media and whiny ignorant left to go into conniptions.

You're too stupid to comprehend the irony of you thinking you know what you are talking about and as usual, are dead wrong again. You realize you are never right?
 
Trump didn't do or say anything wrong.
Someone calls. You listen to what they have to say and determine if it's a joke or credible and proceed accordingly.
Heck, Pencil Neck did that as well.
Hillary on the other hand went after it, paid for it, traitor McCain went and retrieved it and it was UNVERIFIED AND FAKE yet was used to obtain FISA's! :palm:

giphy.gif
 
Trump said he wouldn't call the FBI. So basically, he's telling Russia that if they collude with him directly, he will not call the FBI, there will be no repercussions.

No he didn't say that. Why do you constantly LIE about things?

"I think you might want to listen, there isn't anything wrong with listening," Mr. Trump continued. "If somebody called from a country, Norway, [and said,] 'We have information on your opponent' — Oh, I think I'd want to hear it."

"If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go maybe to the FBI. If I thought there was something wrong," he said.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...-to-taking-info-on-opponents-from-foreigners/
 
Yes he did. He said he'd accept info from foreign government and wouldn't go to the FBI.

LIE and LAME from the mentally retarded asshat of the forum:

"I think you might want to listen, there isn't anything wrong with listening," Mr. Trump continued. "If somebody called from a country, Norway, [and said,] 'We have information on your opponent' — Oh, I think I'd want to hear it."

"If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go maybe to the FBI. If I thought there was something wrong," he said.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...-to-taking-info-on-opponents-from-foreigners/
 
No he didn't.
This is just you bullshitting because that's all you know how to do.
You've spent most of your life bullshitting, so you don't even know what it means to be truthful anymore.

Yes he most certainly did you dishonest dumb fuck:

REPORT: Adam Schiff Fell For Prank, Had Staffers Work to Obtain Dirt on Trump from Foreign Government

The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee was the victim of a prank phone call by Russian comedians who offered to give him ‘compromising’ dirt on Donald Trump – including nude photos of the president and a Russian reality show star.

DailyMail.com can disclose that after the prank, his staff engaged in correspondence with what they thought was a Ukrainian politician to try to obtain the ‘classified’ material promised on the call.

On an audio recording of the prank call posted online, Adam Schiff can be heard discussing the committee’s Russia investigation and increasingly bizarre allegations about Trump with a man who claimed to be Andriy Parubiy, the chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament.

The call, made a year ago, was actually from two Russian comedians nicknamed ‘Vovan’ and ‘Lexus’ who have become notorious for their phony calls to high-ranking American officials and celebrities, including UN Ambassador Nikki Haley and Elton John.

Its existence was first reported by The Atlantic but not how a staff member working for the minority on the House Intelligence Committee pursued the information after the call.

Schiff’s office said the congressman suspected the call was ‘bogus’ from the beginning and reported it to authorities afterward.

But in a recording of the eight minute conversation, Schiff appeared to take the call seriously – or at least played along convincingly – and emails from the Democrat’s staff to the fake politician afterwards said he had found it ‘productive’.


https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/...obtain-dirt-on-trump-from-foreign-government/

Adam Schiff pranked by Russians who offered nude photos of Trump
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/adam-schiff-pranked-by-russians-who-offered-nude-photos-of-trump/
 
I did answer it you whiny, dishonest, clueless asshat; once again:

Abortion is an abomination. The Supreme Court cannot create law out of thin air. Roe vs. Wade was not about laws, it was about jurisprudence writing laws from the bench. That is unconstitutional.

If you had a brain, which you do not, you could understand the OBVIOUS.

Can you imagine the shrill outcry if a Conservative court ruled that all gun laws are unconstitutional and Americans have a right to any weapons they choose? STFU clown.

In other words, you admit your own hypocrisy, the "what law did he break" applies where you wanted to apply but not in other instances, you determine right and wrong situationally

Next
 
In other words, you admit your own hypocrisy, the "what law did he break" applies where you wanted to apply but not in other instances, you determine right and wrong situationally

Next

WRONG again; I admit that you are complete and total dumbasss who is SELDOM right about ANYTHING and only knows how to LIE and CRY.

NEXT.
 
Back
Top