Does Romney have a good jobs record?

Well, his watch did fuck things up pretty much. It takes time for recovery, especially with the European nations doing so poorly. If there is no one to buy goods and services, how do you expect recovery? Businesses are keeping their cash and the Republicans are doing everything they can to impede recovery. Their #1 goal was for Obama to fail, but the bad thing, when Obama fails, we all fail!
Obuma attacked nearly every industry acting like profits are bad. We could be doing much better.
 
Rana I think it means that they were 47th in job creation, not in UI rates. don't let Sf trip you up here.

The point is that with an unemployment rate at 4.7%, there wasn't much room for growth. Full employment is considered to be at 5%. While it can spike lower during bubbles (tech bubble a great example) it is not normally sustainable. I wasn't trying to trip her up. I was explaining to her why one should actually look at what happened rather than quote some random study without analyzing the data itself.
 
Obuma attacked nearly every industry acting like profits are bad. We could be doing much better.

WTF are you talking about????

Obama bent over for the LITERAL criminals who destroyed the world's economy. What more do you and Damo want him to do?

Give it a rest you're making shit up. Those are GOP talking points. Obama attacked no one other than liberals, you know, the "fucking retards" as his boy called us. You're full of shit.
 
The point is that with an unemployment rate at 4.7%, there wasn't much room for growth. Full employment is considered to be at 5%. While it can spike lower during bubbles (tech bubble a great example) it is not normally sustainable. I wasn't trying to trip her up. I was explaining to her why one should actually look at what happened rather than quote some random study without analyzing the data itself.

I thought this was an interesting post from DH:

"At the peak of the prior business cycle unemployment in Massachusetts dropped to 2.6%. So it could drop significantly further, actually.
 
i never ridiculed your attempt. can you actually stay focused on the topic instead of going off on your delusional rants?

tell me...did the ranking increase or decrease under romney? you do realize that when romney took over, the state was ranked 50th. so once again, we have a situation similar to obama taking reins during a bad time, but the difference is, you give obama all the excuses you can come up and give romney all the blame you can come up with.

why is that?

i already explained to you one huge reason MA did not fair well. you of course will ignore anything that doesn't comport to your world view.

Speaking of delusional rants.

First, you did ridicule my initial responses to the topic. Sorry 'bout that. Second, I don't completely absolve Obama of accountability for the current jobs situation, so you're wrong there. Third, I don't "give Romney all the blame I can come up with," so you're wrong there, as well. I said that the 47th ranking stat is worth asking questions about - and you got all of the above out of that. It's amazing.

You really can't read, Yurts.
 
WTF are you talking about????

Obama bent over for the LITERAL criminals who destroyed the world's economy. What more do you and Damo want him to do?

Give it a rest you're making shit up. Those are GOP talking points. Obama attacked no one other than liberals, you know, the "fucking retards" as his boy called us. You're full of shit.
Bullshit his attack on the "exxons of the world" is real. He attacked oil, WS, and anybody not a union. He assfucked bond holders in the auto industry. Obama is the most anti business pres ever.
 
Bullshit his attack on the "exxons of the world" is real. He attacked oil, WS, and anybody not a union. He assfucked bond holders in the auto industry. Obama is the most anti business pres ever.

I figured it would come down to oil w/ you...
 
I thought this was an interesting post from DH:

"At the peak of the prior business cycle unemployment in Massachusetts dropped to 2.6%. So it could drop significantly further, actually.
You think it could have dropped sig from 4.7 when he left. You just earned your nickname dhula
 
The point is that with an unemployment rate at 4.7%, there wasn't much room for growth. Full employment is considered to be at 5%. While it can spike lower during bubbles (tech bubble a great example) it is not normally sustainable. I wasn't trying to trip her up. I was explaining to her why one should actually look at what happened rather than quote some random study without analyzing the data itself.


Full employment in the United States is considered 5%. That does not mean that full employment everywhere in the United States is 5%. In fact, at the peak of the last two business cycles unemployment in Massachusetts has fallen well below 5%, not just during the tech bubble.
 
Bullshit his attack on the "exxons of the world" is real. He attacked oil, WS, and anybody not a union. He assfucked bond holders in the auto industry. Obama is the most anti business pres ever.

Oh, did you lose some money in the bond industry and so now you are all red assed! What a shame! Think of how all those people felt after Enron!
 
Oh, did you lose some money in the bond industry and so now you are all red assed! What a shame! Think of how all those people felt after Enron!
No I didn't you ditz, but a lot of blue haired old grannies like you did. Can you name another pres who stole as much from citizens?
 
I thought this was an interesting post from DH:

"At the peak of the prior business cycle unemployment in Massachusetts dropped to 2.6%. So it could drop significantly further, actually.

Yes, as I stated, it can indeed spike up during bubbles. The tech bubble was one said time. But it is not normal to be that low.
 
Speaking of delusional rants.

First, you did ridicule my initial responses to the topic. Sorry 'bout that. Second, I don't completely absolve Obama of accountability for the current jobs situation, so you're wrong there. Third, I don't "give Romney all the blame I can come up with," so you're wrong there, as well. I said that the 47th ranking stat is worth asking questions about - and you got all of the above out of that. It's amazing.

You really can't read, Yurts.

so you're still going with the delusional "yurt ridiculed me"...good lord, seek help.

you have given obama a pass at every single opportunity. constantly saying...jobs are a lagging indicator. but you did not do so with romney. instead, you blame romney and dishonestly keep claiming that it was 47th the entire time he was in office. not once have you given romney a "jobs are a lagging indicator" defense as you've done for obama.

fact is, under romney MA performed better than when he started. i notice you once again IGNORE facts that you don't want to talk about. for example, you want to talk about MA 4th rank, but you IGNORE the fact MA was 50th when he took office. and you still don't want to discuss the dot.com issue. all you want to do is rant about nothing.

thanks for playing, but you should really stay out of economic threads.
 
Bullshit his attack on the "exxons of the world" is real. He attacked oil, WS, and anybody not a union. He assfucked bond holders in the auto industry. Obama is the most anti business pres ever.

He never attacked Wall Street, they are lucky not to be in prison.

So it's a throw away comment about Exxon. I should have known - oil whore.

Shut the fuck up top you're nothing but a guy whose stupid bitch girlfriend got called a stupid bitch and you're squealing about it.

And you're an idiot.
 
He never attacked Wall Street, they are lucky not to be in prison.

So it's a throw away comment about Exxon. I should have known - oil whore.

Shut the fuck up top you're nothing but a guy whose stupid bitch girlfriend got called a stupid bitch and you're squealing about it.

And you're an idiot.
Cunt, your intern student needs coffee.
He fucked the bond holders in the auto bailout. Only a moron thinks Obuma is pro bussiness. Ditz
No wonder your single. You are a dumb loudmouth bitch
 
so you're still going with the delusional "yurt ridiculed me"...good lord, seek help.

you have given obama a pass at every single opportunity. constantly saying...jobs are a lagging indicator. but you did not do so with romney. instead, you blame romney and dishonestly keep claiming that it was 47th the entire time he was in office. not once have you given romney a "jobs are a lagging indicator" defense as you've done for obama.

fact is, under romney MA performed better than when he started. i notice you once again IGNORE facts that you don't want to talk about. for example, you want to talk about MA 4th rank, but you IGNORE the fact MA was 50th when he took office. and you still don't want to discuss the dot.com issue. all you want to do is rant about nothing.

thanks for playing, but you should really stay out of economic threads.

Cool - thanks for admitting that you lied about all of that.

You're really a strange poster. You might be crazy, or pathological (still crazy in its own way), or you might just be goofing with everyone in some way. Still figuring it out; one thing for sure - engaging you is worthless.
 
Back
Top